Prepositions DO matter in the education research
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This minimal story is an invitation to think about prepositions, even though they are invariant words. The use of one or the other demarcates and determines not only the meaning of what is said, but also, and above all, the place it occupies in the relationship of dependence that defines between two or more parties. It is argued that its use and dominance is a political question. It analyzes the constructions "investigate to" and "investigate about", typical of extrativist, anti-democratic and dehumanizing research. Other constructions are claimed, such as "investigate with", "investigate together with" and "investigate for" to guarantee the cognitive justice that comes from fighting for the "unprecedentedly viable" (Freire, 1993).
Keywords:
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
References
Cheek, J. (2008). A Fine Line Positioning Qualitative Inquiry in the Wake of the Politics of Evidence. En N. K. Denzin, y M. D. Giardina (eds.), Qualitative Inquiry and the Politics of Evidence (pp. 119-133). Left Coast Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098034
Foucault, M. (2004). El orden del discurso. Fácula/Tusquets.
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogía de la esperanza. Reencuentro con la pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford.
Habermas, J. (1999). Teoría de la Acción Comunicativa. Racionalidad de la Acción y Racionalización Social (Vol.I). Taurus.
Larner, G. (2004). Family Therapy and the Politics of Evidence. Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2004.00265.x
Medina, R. (2019). Aplicaciones metodológicas en feminismos y de(s)colonialidad. En AAVV, Otras formas de (des)aprender: investigación feminista en tiempos de violencia, resistencias y decolonialidad (pp. 111-128). Hegoa – SIMREF. https://bit.ly/47R3UC2
Nietzsche, F. (2000). Escritos sobre retórica. Trotta.
Platero, R. (L.) (2012). Introducción: La interseccionalidad como herramienta de estudio de la sexualidad. En R.(L.) Platero (ed.), Intersecciones: cuerpos y sexualidades en la encrucijada (pp. 15-72). Bellaterra.
Real Academia Española (2023). Diccionario de la Lengua Española. Edición del Tricentenario. https://dle.rae.es/
Santos, B. de S. (2021). Descolonizar la universidad. El desafío de la justicia cognitiva global. CLACSO.
Simpson, L., y Klein, N. (2017). Danzar el mundo para traerlo a la vida: conversación con Leanne Simpson de Idle No More. Tabula Rasa, (26), 51-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.25058/20112742.188
Torrance, H. (2018). Evidence, Criteria, Policy, and Politics: The Debate About Quality and Utility in Educational and Social Research. En N. K. Denzin, e Y. S. Lincoln (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1320- 1372). SAGE, 7th ed.
Vázquez Recio, R. (2023). A Deterritorialized Critical Pedagogy for Social and Cognitive Justice Towards an Itinerant Curriculum Theory: An Outlook from Spain. En J. C. Jupp (ed.), Itinerant Curriculum Theory: Decolonial Praxes, Theories, and Histories (pp. 315-352). Peter Lang.