Photograms and screens. Images through the lens of words and words through the lens of images

Authors

  • Verónica Tell National Scientific and Technical Research Council / University of Buenos Aires Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Fotocinema.2019.v0i18.5531

Keywords:

Photogram, Display, Imprint, Self-reference

Abstract

In response to the de-materialisation of photography and to the creation of images via algorithms not necessarily printed to be seen, last years have witnessed the emergence of a number of critical artworks seeking to recover a material nature and invoking the physical appearance of objects. This article aims to address some artworks in this line which are self-referenced as they allude either to their own origin, functioning and cultural meaning, either to their similarities to or differences with verbal communication. This article focuses on items made using the photogram technique as well as on some pieces made for on-screen display through which the intangible image becomes visible. Whether the etymological origin of the word “photography” could be recalled in artworks subverting the hybridization brought by the digital era, it would be to think about the written word that appears through the lens of photography. This will guide the comparative analysis between text and image, their correlation, the impossible translation of one into another and tensions between semantical contents and words materialised as images.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Verónica Tell, National Scientific and Technical Research Council / University of Buenos Aires

National Scientific and Technical Research Council / University of Buenos Aires

References

Batchen, G. (2000), “Ectoplasm. Photography in the Digital Age”, in Squiers, C. (ed.). Overexposed. Essays on Contemporary Photography (pp.9-23). New York: The New York Press.

Buck Morss, S. (2005), “Estudios visuales e imaginación global”, en Brea, J.L. (ed.). Estudios visuales. La epistemología de la visualidad en la era de la globalización (pp.145-159). Madrid: Akal.

Didi Huberman, G. (2008). La ressemblance par contact. Archéologie, anachronisme et modernité de l’empreinte. Paris: Minuit.

Dubois, Ph. (2016). De l’image-trace à l’image-fiction. Le mouvement des théories de la photographie de 1980 à nos jours, Études photographiques, 34. https://journals.openedition.org/etudesphotographiques/3593

Flusser, V. (2014). Para una filosofía de la fotografía. Buenos Aires: La marca.

Fontcuberta, J. (2010). La cámara de Pandora. La fotografí@ después de la fotografía. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

Gunthert, A. (2016). Une illusion essentielle. La photographie saisie par la théorie, Études photographiques, 34. https://journals.openedition.org/etudesphotographiques/3592

Krauss, R. (1977). Notes on the index. Seventies Art in America, October 3, 68-81.

Krauss, R. (1999). Reinventing the medium, Critical Inquiry, 25, 289-305.

Mitchell, W.J.T. (1992). The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Mitchell, W.J.T. (2009). Teoría de la imagen. Ensayos sobre representación verbal y visual. Madrid: Akal.

Schaeffer, J-M. (1987). L’image précaire. Du dispositif photographique. Paris: Du Seuil.

Schneller, K. (2007). Sur les traces de Rosalind Krauss. La réception française de la notion d’index, Études photographiques, 21, pp. 123-143. https://journals.openedition.org/etudesphotographiques/2483

Sekula, A. (1986). The Body and the Archive, October 39, 3-64.

Published

2019-01-27

How to Cite

Tell, V. (2019). Photograms and screens. Images through the lens of words and words through the lens of images. Fotocinema. Revista científica De Cine Y fotografía, (18), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.24310/Fotocinema.2019.v0i18.5531

Issue

Section

ARTICLES