Interactive and social reading intervention in design-based research




Reading research, technology integration, constructivism, learning


This study, carried out within the design-based research framework, aimed to create a digital environment for students with learning problems to read better. The social constructivist approach was used in this study, which generally focuses on the assumption that reading is an active, interactive, dynamic, and social language skill. The instructional content, built on a learning management system, was developed in line with this strategy. Focus on the problem, understand the problem, define the design goals, outline the solution, create the solution, and test the solution stages. This results in effective and efficient digital teaching material that students with learning problems can use in their reading processes. The study clearly showed the development process of digital material, as well as a deep theoretical discussion.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Abu Hatab, S. (2017). Reciprocal Teaching for English and Arabic-Language Learners in Recent Studies. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(6), 178-186.

Ahmadi, H., Behnam, B., & Seifoori, Z. (2021). The reciprocal questioning as a formative assessment strategy: EFL learners' reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 61-93.

Ahmadi, M.R. (2016). The effects of reciprocal teaching strategy on reading comprehension, motivation and metacognition among iranian efl university learners [Doctoral Thesis, Yniversiti Sains Malaysia].

Alemu, M. (2020). Improving secondary school students’ physics achievement using reciprocal peer tutoring: A multi-level quasi-experimental study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4), 1-14.

Alton-Lee, A., Westera, J., & Pulegatoa-Diggins, C. (2012). BES exemplar 4: Reciprocal teaching. Ministry of Education, NZ.

Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Journal of educational technology & society, 11(4), 29-40.

Ardiansyah, W., & Ujihanti, M. (2018). Social constructivist learning theory and reciprocal teaching to teach reading comprehension. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 70-77.

Ariawan, V. A. N., & Winoto, S. (2021). Total reading skills for elementary school students through the reading questioning answering model. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 44-54.

Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.

Barrett, R. A. (2003). Reciprocal teaching as a Platform for communicative activities in the secondary foreign language classroom: A case study. The University of Akron.

Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Harvard University Press.

Brown, S. A., & Pyle, N. (2021). Self-questioning strategy routine to enhance reading comprehension among secondary students. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 53(6), 441-449.

Bruner, J. (1966). The Process of Education. Harvard University Press.

Bui, N. K., Nguyen, H. B., Ly, T. H., & Pham, A. L. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of the Effects of Questioning At Pre-Reading Stage on Reading Comprehension: A Case at a Vietnamese University. Multicultural Education, 7(12), 377-385.

Castells, N., Minguela, M., Solé, I., Miras, M., Nadal, E., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2021). Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(3), 879–912.

Chairinkam, J., & Yawiloeng, R. (2021). Peer Scaffolding Behaviors in English as a Foreign Language Writing Classroom. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(4), 226-234.

Chun, J., & Cennamo, K. (2022). A Theoretical Model of Peer Learning Incorporating Scaffolding Strategies. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 33(3), 385-397.

Clark, L. (2003). Reciprocal-Teaching Strategy and Adult High-School Students. M.A. Research Project, Kean University.

Cockerill, M., O'Keeffe, J., Thurston, A., & Taylor, A. (2022). Reciprocal reading for struggling readers: an exemplar of evidence implementation in schools. Review of Education, 10(1), 1-22.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge

Çetinkaya, G. (2010). Türkçe metinlerin okunabilirlik düzeylerinin tan?mlanmas? ve s?n?fland?r?lmas? [Doctoral thesis, Ankara University]. Akademik Ar?iv Sistemi.

Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

Dew, T.P., Swanto, S., & Pang, V. (2021). The effectiveness of reciprocal teaching as reading comprehension intervention: a systematic review. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(2), 156-184.

Dole, S., Bloom, L., & Kowalske, K. (2016). Transforming Pedagogy: Changing Perspectives from Teacher-Centered to Learner-Centered. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), art.1. 5015.1538

Dolmans, D.H.J.M. (2019). How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research. Advances in Health Science Education, 24, 879–891.

Easterday, M. W., Lewis, D. R., & Gerber, E. M. (2014). Design-based research process: Problems, phases, and applications. International Society of the Learning Sciences.

Ebrahimi, Z., & Sadighi, F. (2022). Comparing the Effect of Online Teacher-Scaffolding vs. Peer-Scaffolding on Iranian EFL Learners’ Grammatical Achievement. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 11(1), 97-120.

Erbil, D. G. (2020). A review of flipped classroom and cooperative learning method within the context of Vygotsky theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1157.

Esfendahad, H. S. (2010). A comparative study of learning styles among monolingual(Persian) and bilingual (Turkish Persian) secondary school, student. Procerdia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2419-2422.

Hamdani, B. (2020). Teaching reading through reciprocal teaching method. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 7(1), 22-34.

Hasan, A., Gushendra, R., & Yonantha, F. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on students’ listening and reading comprehension. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 4(1), 1-15.

Hashemi, A. (2021). The effects of using games on teaching vocabulary in reading comprehension: a case of gifted students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 9(2), 181-191.

Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2022). Exploring teacher scaffolding in a CLIL-framed EFL intensive reading class: A classroom discourse analysis approach. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 333-360.

Lim, J., Whitehead, G. E., & Choi, Y. (2021). Interactive e-book reading vs. paper-based reading: Comparing the effects of different mediums on middle school students’ reading comprehension. System, 97, 102434.

Liu, A., & Bu, Y. (2016). Reciprocal-Learning Strategy in CALL Environment: A Case Study of EFL Teaching at X University in Shanghai. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(5), 1059-1070.

Liu, H. (2021). Does questioning strategy facilitate second language (L2) reading comprehension? The effects of comprehension measures and insights from reader perception. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(2), 339-359.

Munawir, A., Khair, U., & Putriani, N. (2022). The Impact of Using A Reciprocal Teaching Strategy on Reading Comprehension By Prospective Teachers. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(2), 169-175.

Nguyen, H. M. P. (2022). Using Scaffolding to Improve Online Group Presentation in English Literature Classes: An Action Study at Van Lang University. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(4), 21-31.

O’Hare, L., Stark, P., Cockerill, M., Lloyd, K., McConnellogue, S., Gildea, A., Biggart, A., Connolly, P., & Bower, C. (2019). Reciprocal reading: Evaluation report. Education Endowment Foundation.

Oczkus, L. (2003). Introduction. Reciprocal teaching at work: strategies for improving reading comprehension. International Reading Association.

Oo, T. Z., Magyar, A., & Habók, A. (2021). Effectiveness of the reflection-based reciprocal teaching approach for reading comprehension achievement in upper secondary school in Myanmar. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 675-698.

Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.

Parjan, H. W., & Mohamad, M. (2021). Year 5 Pupils’ Perception on Guided Reciprocal Peer Questioning (GRPQ) Strategy in Reading Comprehension: A Conceptual Paper. Creative Education, 12(7), 1643-1654.

Pilonieta, P., & Medina, A. L. (2009). Reciprocal teaching for the primary grades:“We can do it, too!”. The reading teacher, 63(2), 120-129.

Pilten, G. (2016). The Evaluation of Effectiveness of Reciprocal-Teaching Strategies in Comprehension of Expository Texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(10), 232- 247.

Rastegar, M., Kermani, E. M., & Khabir, M. (2017). The relationship between metacognitive reading strategies use and reading comprehension achievement of EFL learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(02), 65.

Ratmeilia, N. R. (2022). The Use of Recount Text by Implementing Pre-Questioning Technique to Improve the Students Reading Comprehension at SMA Muhammadiyah Limbung. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 436-456.

Rattanavich, S. (2017). The Effects of an Experimental Training Programme for Teachers of Vocational English Using Concentrated Language Encounter Instructional Processes and Reciprocal PeerTeaching Strategies. English-Language Teaching,10(12), 58-71.

Reis, A., Araújo, S., Morais, I. S., & Faísca, L. (2020). Reading and reading-related skills in adults with dyslexia from different orthographic systems: a review and meta-analysis. Annals of dyslexia, 70(3), 339-368.

Riswanto, R. (2022). The Impact of a Pre-Questioning Technique on Students' Reading Comprehension at a Bengkulu State Junior High School. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2381-2386.

Rojabi, A. R. (2021). Exploring Reciprocal Teaching Method on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. VELES: Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 132-142.

Solikhah, N. A., & Sari, R. A. (2022). The Influence of Summarizing Short Stories Towards Students’ Narrative Writing Ability. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 1(3), 176-190.

Soto, C., Gutiérrez de Blume, A. P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., & Riffo, B. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1565067.

Stuckelman, Z. D., Strouse, G. A., & Troseth, G. L. (2022). Value added: Digital modeling of dialogic questioning promotes positive parenting during shared reading. Journal of Family Psychology, 36(6), 1010-1020.

Sumarmo, A. (2013). Improving MathematicalCommunication Ability and Self-regulation Learning of Junior High Students by Using Reciprocal Teaching. IndoMS. J.M.E., 4(1), 59-74.

Taheri, P., & Nazmi, R. (2021). Improving EFL Learners' Argumentative Writing Ability: Teacher vs. Peer Scaffolding. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 299-333.

Thohidah, H., Sagita, M., & Jamaliah, J. (2021). Improving Students Reading Comprehension By Applying Pre-Questioning Technique (An Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMAN 1 Glumpang Tiga). Education Enthusiast: Journal Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 1(1), 1-11.

Thurston, A., Cockerill, M., Chiang, T.H., Taylor, A., & O'Keeffe, J. (2020). An efficacy randomized controlled trial of reciprocal reading in secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Research,104, 1–27.

Triana, N. (2021). Paired Reading and Paired Summarizing Strategy: Exploring Motivation and Effects Of EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension. Tamaddun, 20(2), 178-193.

Tseng, S. S., & Yeh, H. C. (2018). Integrating reciprocal teaching in an online environment with an annotation feature to enhance low-achieving students’ English reading comprehension. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(6), 789-802.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wadsworth, B. J. (2006). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development: foundations of constructivism. Longman.

Wells, G. (1999) Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge University Press.

Xu, Y., Chen, C. C., Spence, C., Washington-Nortey, M., Zhang, F., & Brown, A. (2022). Supporting young Spanish speaking English learners through teacher scaffolding and reciprocal peer tutoring. Early Child Development and Care, 192(8), 1324-1336.

Yawiloeng, R. (2021). Peer Scaffolding During EFL Reading Activities: A Sociocultural Perspective. English Language Teaching, 14(12), 44-54.

Yawisah, U. (2017). Reciprocal Teaching: One of the methods for poor comprehenders. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 21-25.

Zahra, A., Mohammad, M., & Mehdi, S. (2022). Oral and Written Summarizing Strategy Training and Reading Comprehension: Peer-Mediated vs. Individualistic Task Performance. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 11-22.

Zendler, A., & Reile, S. (2018). The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed instruction on learning outcome in computer science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 132-144.




How to Cite

Ozer Sanal, S. (2023). Interactive and social reading intervention in design-based research. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 9(1), 112–125.