Software de diseño de instrucción. Evaluación de su utilidad para diseñar exposiciones educativas en museos.

Josep Bosch Bonacasa

doi:10.24310/innoeduca.2020.v6i2.7472

Authors

Josep Bosch Bonacasa Universidad de Girona Spain http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-2032

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2020.v6i2.7472

Keywords:

instructional design, computer software evaluation, museums, non-formal education, learning, instruction

Abstract

Some museum exhibitions are designed for educational purposes. These exhibitions are part of non-formal education although, if analysed from the point of view of instruction, they have many aspects in common with the educational activities of formal education.
There is software developed to design activities that are proper to formal education. However, no software has been found for the design of educational exhibitions in museums.
The aim of this research is to answer two questions:
1. Can any existing software be used to design educational exhibitions in museums?
2. Can any existing software be used as a basis for developing specific software for designing educational exhibitions in museums?
In order to answer these questions, firstly, the concepts that should be included in software for exhibition design have been selected and defined. Many of these concepts are shared with those used for the design of formal education activities; others are specific and have been defined in this research.
Secondly, from among seventeen instructional design software, seven have been selected that have been able to be installed and evaluated. Next, it has been verified, one by one, if they contemplate the concepts that an exhibition design software should include.
The results of the evaluation are presented in a table and some observations. Their analysis has allowed to answer the questions asked.
Of the seven evaluated, one, Compendium LD, can be used for the design of educational exhibitions in museums, although with limitations. None of those analysed consider important concepts such as the location of educational objects in space or the description of visitor itineraries. Compendium LD can also be a good starting point for developing specific software.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Josep Bosch Bonacasa, Universidad de Girona

Graduado en Humanidades por la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), España y Máster en Gestión Cultural por la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), España. Estudiante de Doctorado en Educación en la Universidad de Girona (UdG), España.

References

Agostinho, S. (2011). The use of a visual learning design representation to support the design process of teaching in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 961-978. doi:10.14742/ajet.923

Anido-Rifón, L.E., Fernández-Iglesias, J.M., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., Santos-Gago, J.M., Llamas-Nistal, M., Álvarez, L., y Míguez, R. (2014). Standardization in computer-based education. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 36, 604-625. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2013.09.004

Bafail, A., Tepper, J., Liggett, A., y Banakhr, F. (2017). EDIT: An educational design intelligence tool for supporting design decisions. International Journal for Infonomics, 10 (2), 1307-1315. doi:10.20533/iji.1742.4712.2017.0160

Bitgood, S. (2002). Environmental psychology in museums, zoos, and other exhibition centers. En R. Bechtel y A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp. 461-480). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Brasher, A., Conole, G., Cross, S., Weller, M., Clark, P. y White, J. (2008). CompendiumLD – a tool for e?ective, e?cient and creative learning design. En Proceedings of the 2008 European LAMS Conference: Practical Benefits of Learning Design, 25-27. Recuperado de http://lams2008.lamsfoundation.org/refereed_papers.htm

Britain, S. (2004). A Review of learning design: Concept, specifications and tools. Bolton Institute of Higher Education. Recuperado de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5bd4/2ea654e136db86851f877ac4855631f726f8.pdf

Celik, D., y Magoulas, G.D. (2016). A review, timeline, and categorization of learning design tools. En D. Chiu, I. Marenzi, U. Nanni, M. Spaniol y M.Temperini (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 10013. Advances in Web-Based Learning –ICWL 2016 (pp. 3-13). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_1

Crack, A. y Cohn, S. (2015). Data collection methods for evaluating museum programs and exhibitions. Journal of Museum Education, 40(1), 27-36.

Dalziel, J. (2006). Lessons from LAMS for IMS learning design. En Kinshuk, R. Koper, P. Kommers, P. Kirschner, D. Sampson y W.Didderen (Eds.), ICALT 2006. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 1101-1102). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2006.220

Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E.,... Bower, M. (2016). The Larnaca declaration on learning design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(7), 1-24. doi:10.5334/jime.407

Derntl, M. (2015). OpenGLM : integrating open educational resources in IMS learning design authoring. En N. Richard, M. Sharples (Eds. de la serie) Technology enhanced learning: Vol. 7. The art & science of learning design (pp. 157-168). Rotterdam, Países Bajos: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-103-8_4

Emin, V., Pernin, J.-P., y Aguirre, J.L. (2010). ScenEdit: an intention-oriented authoring environament to design learning scenarios. En M. Wolpers, P.A. Kirschner, M. Scheffel, S. Lindstaedt y V. Dimitrova (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 6383. Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice. EC-TEL 2010 (pp. 626-631). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_65

Figl, K., Derntl, M., Caeiro, M., y Botturi, L. (2010). Cognitive effectiveness of visual instructional design languages. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 21(6), 359-373. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.08.009

Fontal, O., García, S., Arias, B., y Arias, V.(2019). Evaluación de la calidad de programas de educación patrimonial: construcción y calibración de la escala Q-Edutage. Revista de Psicodidactica 24 (1), 31-38. doi:10.1016/j.psicod.2018.07.003

Gómez-Redondo, C., Calaf, R. y Merillas, O. (2017). Diseño de un instrumento de anàlisis para recursos didácticos patrimoniales. Cadmo 25(1), 63-80. doi:10.3280/CAD2017-001008

Griffiths, D., Beauvoir, P., Liber, O., y Barrett-Baxendale, M.(2009) From reload to recourse: learning from IMS learning design implementations. Distance Education, 30, 201-222. doi:10.1080/01587910903023199

Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Derntl, M., Pozzi, F., Chacón, J., Prieto, L.P., y Persico, D. (2018). An integrated environment for learning design. Frontiers in ICT, 5(9),1-19. doi:10.3389/fict.2018.00009

Hernández-Leo, D., Jorrín-Abellán, I.M., Villasclaras-Fernández, E.D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., y Dimitriadis, Y. (2010). A multicase study for the evaluation of a pattern-based visual design process for collaborative learning. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 21, 313-331. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.08.006

Hernández-Leo, D., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Pardo, A., Muñoz-Cristóbal, J.A., y Rodríguez-Triana, M.J. (2019). Analytics for learning design: A layered framework and tools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (1), 139-152. doi:10.1111/bjet.12645

Hernández-Leo, D., Romeo, L., Carralero, M.A., Chacón, J., Carrió, M., Moreno, P., y Blat, J. (2011). LdShake: learning design solutions sharing and co-edition. Computers and education, 57(4), 2249-2260. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.016

Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1999). Education, communication and interpretation: towards a critical pedagogy in museums. En E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), The educational role of the Museum. (pp. 3-27). London and New York: Routledge.

Hornecker, E. y Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. En R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries y G. Olson (Eds.), CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 437-446). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124838

IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (2003). Learning Design Best Practice and Implementation Guide. Recuperado de https://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.html

Katagall, R., Dadde, R., Goudar, R.H., y Rao, S. (2015). Concept mapping in education and semantic knowledge representation: An Illustrative Survey. Procedia Computer Science 48, (International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication & Convergence, ICCC-2014), 638-643. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.146

Katsamani, M., y Retalis, S. (2013). Orchestrating learning activities using the CADMOS learning design tool. Research in Learning Technology, 21. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.18051

Koper, R. (2001). Modelling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical metamodel behind EML. Educational Technology Expertise Center. Open University of the Netherlands. Recuperado de http://eml.ou.nl/introduction/docs/ped-metamodel.pdf

Koper, R., y Manderveld, J. (2004). Educational modelling language: modelling reusable,interoperable, rich and personalised units of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(5), 537-551. doi:10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00412.x

Koutsabasis, P. y Vosinakis, S. (2018). Kinesthetic interactions in museums: conveying cultural heritage by making use of ancient tools and (re?) constructing artworks. Virtual Reality, 22, 103-118. doi:10.1007/s10055-017-0325-0

Lachheb, A., y Boling, E. (2018). Design tools in practice: instructional designers report which tools they use and why. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 30(1), 34-54. doi:10.1007/s12528-017-9165-x

Laforcade, P. (2005). Towards a UML-based Educational Modeling Language. En Proceedings - 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2005 (pp. 855-859). doi:10.1109/ICALT.2005.288

Laurillard, D., Charlton, P., Craft, B., Dimakopoulos, D., Ljubojevic, D., Magoulas, G.,...Whittlestone, K. (2013). A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 15-30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00458.x

Laurillard, D., Kennedy, E., Charlton, P., Wild, J., y Dimakopoulos, D. (2018). Using technology to develop teachers as designers of TEL: Evaluating the learning designer. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1044-1058. doi:10.1111/bjet.12697

Malinverni, L., Schaper, M.-M., y Pares, N. (2016). An evaluation-driven design approach to develop learning environments based on full-body interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 1337-1360. Doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9468-z

Merriënboer, J.J.G., McKenney, S., Cullinan, D. y Heuer, J. (2017). Aligning pedagogy with physical learning spaces. European Journal of Education 52, 253-267. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12225

Merrill, M. D. (2001). Components of instruction toward a theoretical tool for instructional design. Instructional Science, 29(4-5), 291-310. doi:10.1023/A:1011943808888

Mor, Y., y Craft, B. (2012). Learning design: reflections upon the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology, 20. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19196

Mor, Y. y Mogilevsky, O. (2013). Learning Design Studio: Educational practice as design inquiry of learning. En D. Hernández-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma y A. Harrer (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 8095. Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact. Proceedings of the ECTEL 2013 (pp. 233-245). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_19

Mujtaba, T., Lawrence, M., Oliver, M., y Reiss, M-J (2018). Learning and engagement through natural history museus. Studies in Science Education, 54(1), 41-67. doi:10.1080/03057267.2018.1442820

Muñoz-Cristóbal, J.A., Hernández-Leo, D., Carvalho, L., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Thompson, K., Wardak, D., y Goodyear, P. (2018). 4FAD: A framework for mapping the evolution of artefacts in the learning design process. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 16-34. doi:10.14742/ajet.3706

Nisi, V., Dionisio, M., Barretoa, M., y Nunesa, N. (2018). A mixed reality neighborhood tour: Understanding visitor experience and perceptions. Entertainment Computing, 27, 89-100. doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2018.04.002

Paquette, G., y Léonard, M. (2008). A visual ontology-driven LD editor and player: Application to the planet game case study. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2. doi:10.5334/2008-25

Persico, D., y Pozzi, F. (2015). Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 230-248. doi:10.1111/bjet.12207

Pozzi, F., Persico, D., y Earp, J. (2015). A multi-dimensional space for learning design representations and tools. En N. Richard, M. Sharples (Eds. de la serie) Technology enhanced learning: Vol. 7. The art & science of learning design (pp. 49-62). Rotterdam, Países Bajos: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-103-8_4

Prieto, L.P., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y., Gómez-Sánchez, E., y Muñoz-Cristóbal, J.A. (2011). GLUE!-PS: A multi-language architecture and data model to deploy TEL designs to multiple learning environments. En C.D. Kloos, D. Gillet, R.M. Crespo-García, F. Wild y M. Wolpers (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: vol. 6964.Towards Ubiquitous Learning. EC-TEL 2011 (pp. 285-298). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_23

Prieto, L., Dimitriadis, Y., Craft, B., Derntl, M., Émin, V., Katsamani, M.,... Villasclaras, E. (2013). Learning design Rashomon II: exploring one lesson through multiple tools. Research in Learning Technology, 21. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.20057

Sobreira, P., y Tchounikine, P. (2015). Table-based representations can be used to offer easy-to-use, ?exible, and adaptable learning scenario editors. Computers & Education, 80, 15-27. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.002

Torres, J., Resendiz, J., Aedo, I., y Dodero, J.M. (2014). A model-driven development approach for learning design using the LPCEL Editor. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 26, 17-27. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.004

Welie, M., Veer, G., y Eliëns, A. (1998). Euterpe -Tool support for analyzing cooperative environments. En Ninth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, (pp. 25-30).