Futilidad de ciertos argumentos contra el acosmismo de Spinoza An Account of the weakness of certain Arguments against the acosmist Doctrine of Spinoza

Authors

  • Miquel Beltrán Universidad de las Islas Baleares Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/stheg.v0i1.3695

Keywords:

Spinoza, Acosmism, Modes, En Sof, God, Kabbalah

Abstract

As the title of this paper indicates, we will try to give an account of the weakness of certain arguments that have recently been put forward to prove that Spinoza’s Ethics does not contain an acosmist doctrine.  Inversely, we maintain that this alleged impossibility is based on a misunderstanding of what is God in the Ethics (a substance that constitutes itself as an essence just to be grasped by infinite and finite intellects), due to the ignorance of the influence of Kabbalah on Spinoza’s metaphysics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
41%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Universidad de Málaga

Published

2017-12-16

How to Cite

Beltrán, M. (2017). Futilidad de ciertos argumentos contra el acosmismo de Spinoza An Account of the weakness of certain Arguments against the acosmist Doctrine of Spinoza. STUDIA HEGELIANA. JOURNAL OF THE SPANISH SOCIETY FOR HEGELIAN STUDIES, 1. https://doi.org/10.24310/stheg.v0i1.3695

Issue

Section

STUDIES