Rights and Law in Hegel´s Theory of Objective Spirit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Studiahegelianastheg.v8i.14563Keywords:
Right, Law, Objective Spririt, HegelAbstract
The German word ‘Recht’ is difficult to translate in some languages, such as English. It may stand for both subjective ‘right(s)’ and objective ‘law’. The usual translation of ‘Recht’ as ‘right’ is certainly justified, yet it should not imply an understanding of Hegel’s theory of objective spirit as a mere rights-based position. I suggest a more nuanced reading firstly by tracing the philosophical history of the concepts ‘subjective right’ and ‘objective law’. A quantitative analysis of Hegel’s usage of the word ‘Recht’ reveals then how he consciously mobilizes the whole range of its meanings. Therefore, I propose an institutionalist approach to Hegel’s philosophy of law and right: the word ‘Recht’ is then a metonymic epitome of legal, social and political institutions. Objective rules, subjective behaviors and attitudes are intertwined in these institutions. It would run contrary to Hegel’s entire philosophy of objective spirit to favor unilaterally the viewpoint of rights over that of law (or duties); therefore, this theory is not merely a ‘philosophy of right(s)’.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bentham, J. Pannomial Fragments, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, edited by J. Bowring, vol. III.
Vincent Descombes, Le complément de sujet, Paris, Gallimard, 2004
Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1978.
Michel Foucault, “‘Omnes et singulatim’: vers une critique de la raison politique”, in: Foucault, Dits et écrits, t. II, Paris, Gallimard (Quarto), 2001.
H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law, 2d edition, Oxford UP, 1994.
Maurice Hauriou, “La théorie de l’institution et de la foundation” (1928), in: Hauriou, Aux sources du droit : le pouvoir, l’ordre, la liberté, Presses Universitaires de Caen, 1986.
G.W.F. Hegel: Gesammelte Werke. In verbindung mit der deutschen forschungsgemeinschaft herausgegeben von der nordrhein-westfälischen akademie der wissenschaften und der künste. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1968ff.
Hegel, Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, ed. by K.-H. Ilting, Band. 1, Stuttgart, Frommann-Holzboog, 1973.
G. W. F. Hegel Elements of the Philosophy of Right, edited by Allen W. Wood, translated by H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
G. W. F. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, translated by W. Dyde, Amherst, N.Y., Prometheus Books, 1996 [First: London, G. Bell, 1896]
G. W. F. Hegel Outlines of the Philosophy of Right, translated by T. M. Knox, revised, edited and introduced by Stephen Houlgate, Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press, 2008.
G. W. F. Hegel, Obras II. Líneas fundamentales de la filosofía del derecho, trad. M. C. Paredes Martín, Madrid: Editorial Gredos, 2010.
The Science of Logic, translated by George De Giovanni, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
G. W. F. Hegel, Enciclopedia de las ciencias filosóficas [1830], trad. R. Valls Plana, edición bilingüe, Madrid: Abada Editores, 2017.
G. W. F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by T. Pinkard, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
KANT, I.: Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 1–22, Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 23, Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 24, Berlin, Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen,1900ff.
J-F. Kervégan, The Actual and the Rational. Hegel and Objective Spirit, University of Chicago Press, 2018.
Rudolf von Jhering, Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung, Teil 3, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1865.
Alain de Libéra, Archéologie du sujet, 2: La quête de l’identité, Paris, Vrin, 2008.
Rousseau Du contrat social
F. C. von Savigny, System des heutigen römischen Rechts, Band 1, Berlin,Veit, 1840
Max Weber, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen, Mohr-Siebeck, 1972.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All contents published in Studia Hegeliana. Journal of the Spanish Society for Hegelian Studies, are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 licence (specifically, CC-by-nc-sa), the full text of which can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>. Derivative works are therefore permitted as long as they are not used for commercial purposes. The original work may not be used for commercial purposes. The journal is not responsible for the opinions expressed by the authors of the works published in it.
It is the authors' responsibility to obtain the necessary permissions for images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal retain the copyright. It is non-exclusive right to use their contributions for scholarly, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or deposit in open access repositories of any kind.
Since volume 7 of 2021 the journal Studia Hegeliana has changed the copyright. Since that year the authors have retained the copyright.
The electronic edition of this journal is published by the Editorial de la Universidad de Málaga (UmaEditorial), being necessary to cite the source in any partial or total reproduction.
244.png)
