Ways of participation during the practicum in the classroom community as opportunities to learn the teaching profession

Authors

  • Bárbara Camila Toledo Fierro Universidad Austral de Chile Chile
  • Teresa Mauri Universitat de Barcelona Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v3i1.8272

Keywords:

Participation, practicum, interaction, student teaching, observational learning

Abstract

This article presents some of the results of an investigation focused on knowing the forms of joint participation of a student teacher and a tutor in a classroom community during the practicum. The research is part of a sociocultural perspective of learning understood as participation. The methodology corresponds to a singular case study consisting of a teacher of Early Childhood Education, eighteen students and a student teacher. Fifteen classroom sessions distributed throughout a semester are analysed. The results allows the identification of nine different forms of joint participation, pre-sent during the practicum, which for the student teacher represent varying degrees of involvement and co-responsibility in said classroom community. The distribution of the different forms of participation throughout the practicum does not follow, as would be expected, a growing trend, from less to more participation of the student teacher, but it shows important oscillations that involve advances and setbacks in the degree of in - volvement in the tasks of the classroom, even in those in which she had already achie-ved high levels of involvement. These oscillations are explained according to specific aspects of the sociocultural practice of the classroom in which they occur.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Bárbara Camila Toledo Fierro, Universidad Austral de Chile

Coordinadora de Oficina de Acreditación y Autoevaluación, Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, y Docente adjunta, Escuela de Psicología. Universidad Austral de Chile.

Teresa Mauri, Universitat de Barcelona

Catedrática de Escuela Universitaria del Departament de Cognició, Desenvolupament i Psicologia de l’Educació

References

Billett, S. (2014). Mimetic learning at work. Learning in the circumstances of practice. Dordrecht, Países Bajos: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09277-5

Coll, C., Bustos, A., y Engel, A. (2008). Las comunidades virtuales de aprendiza je. En C. Coll, y C. Monereo (Eds.), Psicología de la educación virtual (pp. 299- 320). Madrid, España: Morata.

Coll, C., Onrubia, J., & Mauri, T. (2008). Ayudar a aprender en contextos educativos:el ejercicio de la influencia educativa y el análisis de la enseñanza. Revista de Educación, Mayo-Agosto, 33-70. Recuperado de http://www.revistaeducacion.mec.es/re346/re346_02.pdf

Colomina, R., Onrubia, J. y Rochera, M. (2001). Interactividad, mecanismos de influencia educativa y construcción del conocimiento en el aula. En C. Coll, J. Palacios, y M. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. Volumen II. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 437-458). Madrid, España: Alianza.

Edwards, A. (2005). Let’s get beyond community and practice: The many meanings of learning by participating. Curriculum Journal, 16, 49-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517042000336809

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of education and work, 14, 133-156. Recuperado de http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13639080020028747

Filliettaz, L., Trébert, D., & Rémery, V. (2012). Relation tutorale et configuration de participation a? l’interaction: le cas de la formation professionnelle des éducatriceset éducateurs de l’enfance [Relación tutorial y configuración de la participaciónen la interacción: el caso de la formación profesional de educadores y educadoras de infantes]. Ponencia presentada en el 2° Coloquio internacional de didáctica profesional, aprendizaje y desarrollo profesional, Universidad de Nantes, Nantes,Francia. Recuperado de https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:27171

Hodkinson, P., y Hodkinson, H. (2004). A constructive critique of communities of practice: moving beyond Lave and Wenger. Paper presentado en Integrating workand learning – contemporary issues’ seminar series 2004. Sidney, Australia. Recuperado de http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A37993

Lave, J., y Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Lave, J., y Wenger, E. (2002). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. En M. Lea, y K. Nicoll (Eds.), Distributed Learning. Social and cultural approaches to practice (pp. 56-63). London, Inglaterra: Routledge.

Matusov, E. (1998). When solo activity is not privileged: Participation and internalization models of development. Human Development, 41, 326-349. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000022595

Mauri,T., Clarà, M., Ginesta, A. y Colomina, R. (2013). La contribución al aprendizaje en el lugar de trabajo de los equipos docentes universitarios. Un estudio exploratorio. Infan-cia y Aprendizaje, 36(3), 341-360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1174/021037013807533025

Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appro-priation, guided participation and apprenticeship. En J. Wertsch, P. del Río, y A. Álvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambrid-ge University Press.

Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chavez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145118

Schatzki, T.R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitu-tion of social life and change. Philadelphia, Estados Unidos: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Schatzki, T.R. (2010). Materiality and social life. Nature and Culture, 5, 123-149. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/nc.2010.050202

Toledo, B., y Mauri, T. (2014). Construcción social de las prácticas de una comunidad de aula de educación infantil: Análisis de la actividad conjunta de la maestra tutora, maes-tra practicante y alumnos/as. En M. A. Flores, C. Coutinho, y J. A. Lencastre (Comps.), Atas do congresso Formac?a?o e trabalho docente na sociedade da aprendizagem. Orga-nizado no a?mbito da International Study Association on Teachers and Teaching (ISATT) e do Centro de Investigac?a?o em Estudos da Crianc?a (CIEC) (pp. 489-500). Braga, Por-tugal: CIEC, UMinho.

Toledo, B., y Mauri, T. (2015). Dinámicas de participación en una comunidad de aula: Oportunidades de aprendizaje del futuro maestro durante el período de prácticum. Pa-peles de Trabajo sobre Cultura, Educación y Desarrollo Humano, 11, 121-127. Recupe-rado de http://www.uam.es/otros/ptcedh/2015v11_pdf/v11n2sp.pdf

Toledo, B. y Mauri, T. (2016). Aprendizaje como participación durante el prácticum en un aula de Educación Infantil. Estudios Pedagógicos, 42, 343-363. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052016000200020Wenger, E. (1998/2001). Comunidades de práctica. Aprendizaje, significado e identidad (G. Sánchez, Trad.; Título original: Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity). Barcelona: Paidós.

Yin, R. (2006). Case study methods. En J. Green, G. Camilli, y P. Elmore (Eds.), Hand-book of complementary methods in education research (pp. 111-122). Mahwah, Esta-dos Unidos: Lawrence Erlbaum y AERA.

Young, R. (2008). Chapter two: Foundations for the study of practice. Lenguage Lear-ning, 58(2), 9-47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00489.x

Published

2018-06-19

How to Cite

Toledo Fierro, B. C., & Mauri, T. (2018). Ways of participation during the practicum in the classroom community as opportunities to learn the teaching profession. Diario De Practicum, 3(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v3i1.8272

Issue

Section

Investigación