The end of art according to Danto: critical visions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Eviternare.v0i3.8175Keywords:
Art, hegelianism, hermeneutics, play, analytic philosophyAbstract
During the eighties and nineties, Arthur Danto developed his famous theory of the end of art, which led to criticisms from philosophers and artists. Some arguments of this controversy came from aparently distant sources from the aesthetic realm like logical positivism or analytic philosophy. However, as I will try to show, these positions refer ultimately to two famous conceptions of art of the European aesthetic tradition.
Downloads
Metrics
References
AYERS, Alfred (1992). Lenguaje, verdad y lógica. Universitat de València. Servei de Publicacions.
DANTO, Arthur (2002). La transfiguración del lugar común. Paidós: Barcelona.
DANTO, Arthur (1999). Después del fin del arte. Paidós: Barcelona.
DICKIE, George (1974). Art and the aesthetic. Cornell University Press: Nueva York.
DICKIE, George (2005). El círculo del arte. Paidós: Barcelona.
DICKIE, George (1997). Introduction to Aesthetics: An Analytic Approach. Oxford University Press USA: Nueva York.
FUKUYAMA, Francis (1994). El fin de la historia y el ultimo hombre. Planeta-De Agostini: Barcelona
GADAMER, Hans-Georg (2003). Verdad y Método. Editorial Sígueme: Salamanca.
HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (2015). Filosofía del arte o Estética. Abada editores: Madrid.
LYOTARD, Jean-François (2006). La condición postmoderna. Editorial Cátedra: Madrid.
KOSUTH, Joseph (1969). “Art after Philosophy”, Studio International, nº 915: Londres.
MARGOLIS, Joseph (1998). “Farewell to Danto and Goodman”, British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 38, n° 4: Oxford.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the contents published in Revista Eviterna are subject to the Creative Commons Reconocimento-NoComercia-Compartirigual 4.0 license, the full text of which can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exposed, provided that:
The authorship and original source of your publication (Journal, editorial and URL of the work) are cited.
They are not used for commercial purposes.
The existence and specifications of this use license are mentioned.
Copyright is of two kinds: moral rights and patrimonial rights. Moral rights are perpetual, inalienable, inalienable, inalienable, inalienable and imprescriptible prerogatives.
In accordance with copyright legislation, Revista Eviterna recognizes and respects the moral rights of the authors, as well as the ownership of the economic right, which will be transferred to the University of Malaga for dissemination in open access.
The economic rights refer to the benefits obtained by the use or disclosure of the works. Revista Eviterna is published in open access and is exclusively authorized to carry out or authorize by any means the use, distribution, disclosure, reproduction, adaptation, translation or transformation of the work.
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
12.png)
