La imagen del carnero en el Sacrificio de Isaac. Continuidad y variación en la cultura visual

Andrés Herraiz Llavador

doi:10.24310/BoLArte.2020.v41i.8062

Authors

Andrés Herraiz Llavador Universitat de València Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/BoLArte.2020.v41i.8062

Keywords:

Ram, Sacrifice of Isaac, Angel, Iconographic Analysis, Fathers of the Church, Alcuin of York, Christian Tradition

Abstract

The ram figure stands out significantly in the animalistic symbolism in Christianity. The present article focuses on the diachronic study of the representations of this animal inserted within the iconographic type of the Sacrifice of Isaac, whose literary source is Genesis 22. The detailed analysis of this significant element in the Old Testament passage becomes essential when reading the first texts made by the Fathers of the Church, generating, in itself, the appearance of the angel carrying the ram, a typological variant in the future of the iconographic type in its continuity and variation. The objective, therefore, is to attend to those representations that are based on sources of the patristic, the Hebrew haggadah and the Islamic tafsir that are witness to the survival of the typological variants within the Western conventionalized cultural tradition.

Downloads

Metrics

Visualizaciones del PDF

554

| |

Visualizaciones del HTML

7,602

|

Publication Facts

This article

Author statements

Data availability

N/A

16%

External funding

N/A

32%

Competing interests

N/A

11%

This journal

Other journals

Articles accepted

1%

33%

Days to publication

249

145

Indexed in

—

Editor & editorial board: profiles
Academic society: N/A
Publisher: Universidad de Málaga.

PFL

How useful do you find this label?

	1	2	3	4	5
Not useful						Very useful

I'm associated with...

Author Biography

Andrés Herraiz Llavador, Universitat de València

Andrés Herraiz Llavador es investigador predoctoral del Departamento de Historia del Arte de la Universitat de València, donde realizó sus estudios de grado. Su tesis, aborda la construcción del tipo iconográfico del Sacrificio de Isaac y su proyección cultural en el Mundo Contemporáneo. Forma parte del grupo de investigación APES Cultura Visual, que dirige el Dr. Rafael García Mahíques. Es miembro de la Sociedad Española de Emblemática y Vicepresidente del grupo de jóvenes investigadores de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia de la Universitat de València. El interés por los tipos iconográficos del cristianismo lo comparte con el estudio y gestión de las manifestaciones artísticas propias de la visualidad contemporánea.

References

GINZBERG, Louis (1913), «Bible Times and Characters from the creation to Jacob», en SZOLD, Henrietta (dir.), The Legends of the Jews, The Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia, pp. 279-286.

GUTMANN, Joseph (1987), «The Sacrifice of Isaac in Medieval Jewish Art», Artibus et Historiae, vol. 8, n.º 16, pp. 67-89.

HAMZA, Feras (2007), Tafsi?r al-Jala?layn, Royal Aal al-Bayt, Institute for Islamic Thought, Amman.

MOORE SMITH, Alison (1922), «The Iconography of the Sacrifice of Isaac in Early Christian Art», American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 26, n.º 2 pp. 159-173.

RÉAU, Louis (2007), Iconografía del arte cristiano. Iconografía de la Biblia-Antiguo Testamento, Ediciones del Serbal, Barcelona.

SCHAPIRO, Meyer (1943), «The Angel with the Ram in Abraham’s Sacrifice: A Parallel in Western and Islamic Art», Ars Islamica, vol. 10, pp. 134-147.

— (1967), «An Irish-Latin Text on the Angel with the Ram in Abraham’s Sacrifice», en FRASHER, Douglas (ed.), Essays in the History of Art Presented to Rudolf Wittkower, Nueva York, pp. 17-19.

SPEYART VAN WOERDEN, Isabel (1961), «The iconography of the Sacrifice of Abraham», en MORHMAN, Christine (ed), Vigiliae christianae a review of early christian life and language, North-Holland pblishing company, Amsterdam, pp. 214-255.

VAN BEKKUM, J. Wout (2002), «The Aquedah and Its Interpretations in Midrash and Piyyut», en NOORT, Ed. (ed.), The sacrifice of Isaac The Aqedah (Genesis 22) and Its Interpretations, BRILL, Leiden, pp. 86-96.