President interlocking, family firms and performance during turbulent times: Evidence from Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v6i2.5019Keywords:
Empresas familiares, Interlocking de presidentes, Latinoamérica, Resultados, IncertidumbreAbstract
n Latin America, company ownership is typically concentrated in the hands of controlling families, who build powerful business groups which facilitate interlocking practices. The purpose of this study is to examine how President interlocking relates with financial performance in Latin American firms, under uncertainty circumstances. Using regression analysis (panel least squares), the association between return on assets and President interlocking during turbulent times is analyzed. For the latter, annual data (2009–2010) from non-financial publicly traded companies in Chile (243 firms) and Mexico (89 firms) is employed. It is documented that President interlocking in Latin American firms is positively associated with financial performance. However, this effect is higher in Chile than in Mexico, where minority shareholders and other stakeholders are better protected against expropriation. This study increases the understanding of the strengths of President interlocks in stormy times, by introducing the Latin American context.Downloads
Metrics
References
Aguilera and Cuervo-Cazurra, 2009
R.V. Aguilera,A. Cuervo-Cazurra
Codes of good governance
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17 (2009), pp. 376-387
Ahuja, 2000
G. Ahuja
Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study
Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (2000), pp. 425-455
Baek et al., 2004
J.S. Baek,J.K. Kang,K.S. Park
Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from the Korean financial crisis
Journal of Financial Economics, 71 (2004), pp. 265-313
Baum and Oliver, 1992
J. Baum,C. Oliver
Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations
American Sociological Review, 57 (1992), pp. 540-559
Bazerman and Schoorman, 1983
M.H. Bazerman,D. Schoorman
A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates
The Academy of Management Review, 8 (1983), pp. 206-217
Beckman et al., 2004
C.M. Beckman,P.R. Haunschild,D.J. Phillips
Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection
Organization Science, 15 (2004), pp. 259-275
Berger and Bonaccorsi di Patti, 2006
A. Berger,E. Bonaccorsi di Patti
Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry
Journal of Banking & Finance, 30 (2006), pp. 1065-1102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26734
Medline
Berglof and Claessens, 2006
E. Berglof,S. Claessens
Enforcement and good corporate governance in developing countries and transition economies
The World Bank Research Observer, 21 (2006), pp. 121-150
Boubakri et al., 2005
N. Boubakri,J.C. Cosset,O. Guedhami
Postprivatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection
Journal of Financial Economics, 76 (2005), pp. 369-399
Boyd, 1990
B. Boyd
Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model
Strategic Management Journal, 11 (1990), pp. 419-430
Burt, 1983
R.S. Burt
Corporate profits and cooperation
Academic Press, (1983)
Cárdenas, 2014
J. Cárdenas
Are Latin America's corporate elites transnationally interconnected? A network analysis of interlocking directorates
Global Networks, 15 (2014), pp. 424-445
Carlin and Mayer, 2000
W. Carlin,C. Mayer
International evidence on corporate governance: Lessons for developing countries
Revista Abante, 2 (2000), pp. 133-160
Carpenter and Westphal, 2001
M.A. Carpenter,J.D. Westphal
The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making
Academy of Management Journal, 4 (2001), pp. 639-660
Carrington, 1981
P. Carrington
Horizontal co-optation through corporate interlocks
University of Toronto, (1981)
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
Castañeda, 2005
G. Castañeda
Consequences of firms’ relational financing in the aftermath of the 1995 Mexican banking crisis
Journal of Applied Economics, 8 (2005), pp. 53-79
Caswell, 1984
J.A. Caswell
An institutional perspective on corporate control and the network of interlocking directorates
Journal of Economic Issues, 18 (1984), pp. 619-626
Chong et al., 2009
A. Chong,J. Guillén,F. López-de-Silanes
Corporate governance reform and firm value in Mexico: An empirical assessment
Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 12 (2009), pp. 163-188
Claessens et al., 2000
S. Claessens,S. Djankov,L.C. Xu
Corporate performance in the East Asian financial crisis
The World Bank Research Observer, 15 (2000), pp. 23-46
Coles et al., 2008
J.L. Coles,N.D. Daniel,L. Naveen
Boards: Does one size fit all?
Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2008), pp. 329-356
Coles et al., 2001
J.L. Coles,V.B. McWilliams,N. Sen
An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms on performance
Journal of Management, 27 (2001), pp. 23-50
Collins and Clark, 2003
C.J. Collins,K.D. Clark
Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational advantage
Academy of Management Journal, 46 (2003), pp. 740-751
Combe and Botschen, 2004
I.A. Combe,G. Botschen
Strategy paradigms for the management of quality: Dealing with complexity
European Journal of Marketing, 38 (2004), pp. 500-523
Davis, 1993
G.F. Davis
Who gets ahead in the market for corporate directors: The political economy of multiple board memberships
Best papers proceedings of the academy of management, pp. 202-206
Deloof and Vermoesen, 2015
M. Deloof,V. Vermoesen
Did corporate boards matter during the Great Depression? Belgian evidence
Working paper. University of Antwerp, (2015)
di Donato and Tiscini, 2009
F. di Donato,R. Tiscini
Cross ownership and interlocking directorates between banks and listed firms: An empirical analysis of the effects on debt leverage and cost of debt in the Italian case
Corporate Ownership and Control, 6 (2009), pp. 473-481
Drago et al., 2015
C. Drago,F. Millo,R. Ricciuti,P. Santella
Corporate governance reforms, interlocking directorship and company performance in Italy
International Review of Law and Economics, 41 (2015), pp. 38-49
Dyck and Zingales, 2004
A. Dyck,L. Zingales
Private benefits of control: An international comparison
Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), pp. 5637-6000
Dyer, 1996
J.H. Dyer
Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry
Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1996), pp. 271-291
Farías, 2014
P. Farías
Business group characteristics and firm operating performance: Evidence from Chile
Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 27 (2014), pp. 226-235
Fernández-Pérez et al., 2012
V. Fernández-Pérez,V.J. García-Morales,O.F. Bustinza-Sánchez
The effects of CEOs’ social networks on organizational performance through knowledge and strategic flexibility
Personnel Review, 41 (2012), pp. 777-812
Fernández-Pérez et al., 2014
V. Fernández-Pérez,F.J. Llorens Montes,V.J. García-Morales
Towards strategic flexibility: social networks, climate and uncertainty
Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114 (2014), pp. 858-871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007658
Medline
Fich and White, 2003
E.M. Fich,L.J. White
CEO compensation and turnover: The effects of mutually interlocked boards
Wake Forest Law Review, 38 (2003), pp. 935-959
Fich and White, 2005
E.M. Fich,L.J. White
Why do CEOs reciprocally sit on each other's boards?
Journal of Corporate Finance, 11 (2005), pp. 175-195
Fich and Shivdasani, 2006
E.M. Fich,A. Shivdasani
Are busy boards effective monitors?
The Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), pp. 689-724
Fliaster and Spiess, 2008
A. Fliaster,J. Spiess
Knowledge mobilization through social ties: The cost–benefit analysis
Schmalenbach Business Review, 60 (2008), pp. 99-117
Galaskiewicz et al., 1985
J. Galaskiewicz,S. Wasserman,B. Raushenbach,W. Bielefeld,P. Mulaney
The influence of corporate power, social status and market position on corporate interlocks in a regional network
Social Forces, 64 (1985), pp. 403-443
Geletknaycz and Hambrick, 1997
M.A. Geletknaycz,D.C. Hambrick
The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance
Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1997), pp. 654-681
Golden and Zajac, 2001
B.R. Golden,E.J. Zajac
When will boards influence strategy? Inclination times power equals strategic change
Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2001), pp. 1087-1111
Gomes, 2000
A. Gomes
Going public without governance: Managerial reputation effects
The Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), pp. 615-646
Granovetter, 1994
M. Granovetter
Business groups
Handbook of economic sociology, pp. 453-475
Harford and Li, 2007
J. Harford,K. Li
Decoupling CEO wealth and firm performance: The case of acquiring CEOs
The Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), pp. 917-949
Haynes and Hillman, 2010
K.T. Haynes,A. Hillman
The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change
Strategic Management Journal, 31 (2010), pp. 1145-1163
Huse, 2005
M. Huse
Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance
British Journal of Management, 16 (2005), pp. 65-79
Jiraporn et al., 2009
P. Jiraporn,S. Manohar,C.I. Lee
Ineffective corporate governance: Director busyness and board committee memberships
Journal of Banking and Finance, 33 (2009), pp. 819-828
Khanna and Palepu, 2000
T. Khanna,K. Palepu
Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups
Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), pp. 867-891
Koenig and Gogel, 1981
T. Koenig,R. Gogel
Interlocking corporate directorships as a social network
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 40 (1981), pp. 37-50
Kor and Sundaramurthy, 2009
Y.Y. Kor,C. Sundaramurthy
Experienced-based human capital and social capital of outside directors
Journal of Management, 35 (2009), pp. 981-1006
Leff, 1978
N.H. Leff
Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in developing countries: The economic groups
Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26 (1978), pp. 661-675
Lefort, 2005
F. Lefort
Ownership structure and corporate governance in Latin America
Revista Abante, 8 (2005), pp. 55-84
Lefort and González, 2008
F. Lefort,R. González
Hacia un mejor gobierno corporativo en Chile
Revista Abante, 11 (2008), pp. 19-45
Lim and Porpora, 1987
M.H. Lim,D.V. Porpora
Stock ownership and interlocking directorates among Malaysia's top corporations
Critical Sociology, 14 (1987), pp. 77-101
Loderer and Peyer, 2002
C. Loderer,U. Peyer
Board overlap, seat accumulation and share prices
European Financial Management, 8 (2002), pp. 165-192
Martin et al., 2015
G. Martin,R. Gözübüyük,M. Becerra
Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship
Strategic Management Journal, 36 (2015), pp. 235-253
McEvily and Marcus, 2005
B. McEvily,A. Marcus
Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities
Strategic Management Journal, 26 (2005), pp. 1033-1055
McKinsey and Company, 2007
McKinsey & Company
Potenciando el Gobierno Corporativo de las Empresas en Chile
(2007)
McNulty and Pettigrew, 1999
T. McNulty,A. Pettigrew
Strategists on the board
Organization Studies, 20 (1999), pp. 47-74
Milliken, 1987
F.J. Milliken
Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty
The Academy of Management Review, 12 (1987), pp. 133-143
Mitton, 2002
T. Mitton
A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis
Journal of Financial Economics, 64 (2002), pp. 215-241
Mizruchi and Galaskiewicz, 1993
M.S. Mizruchi,J. Galaskiewicz
Networks of interorganizational relations
Sociological Methods and Research, 22 (1993), pp. 46-70
Mizruchi, 1996
M.S. Mizruchi
What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique and assessment of research on interlocking directorates
Annual Review of Sociology, 22 (1996), pp. 271-298
Nadkarni and Narayanan, 2007
S. Nadkarni,V.K. Narayanan
Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed
Strategic Management Journal, 28 (2007), pp. 243-270
Nicholson et al., 2004
G. Nicholson,M. Alexander,G. Kiel
Defining the social capital of the board of directors: An exploratory study
Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, 10 (2004), pp. 54-72
OECD, 2004
OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (2004): http://www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/31557724.pdf.
OECD, 2011
OECD
Strengthening Latin American corporate governance: The role of institutional investors
OECD Latin America Corporate Governance Roundtable, (2011)
Ong et al., 2003
C. Ong,D. Wan,K. Ong
An exploratory study on interlocking directorates in listed firms in Singapore
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11 (2003), pp. 323-333
Palmer, 1983
D.A. Palmer
Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination
Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (1983), pp. 40-55
Peng et al., 2001
M.W. Peng,K.Y. Au,D.Y.L. Wang
Interlocking directorates as corporate governance in third world multinationals: Theory and evidence from Thailand
Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18 (2001), pp. 161-181
Pennings, 1980
J.M. Pennings
Interlocking directorates
Jossey-Bass, (1980)
Pfeffer, 1972
J. Pfeffer
Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment
Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1972), pp. 218-228
Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978
J. Pfeffer,G. Salancik
The external control of organizations
Harper & Row, (1978)
Piccardi et al., 2010
C. Piccardi,L. Calatroni,F. Bertoni
Communities in Italian corporate networks
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 389 (2010), pp. 5247-5258
Podolny, 1993
J.M. Podolny
A status-based model of market competition
American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1993), pp. 829-872
Powell et al., 1999
W.W. Powell,K.W. Koput,L. Smith-Doerr,J. Owen-Smith
Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry
Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16 (1999), pp. 129-159
Ravasi and Zattoni, 2006
D. Ravasi,A. Zattoni
Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of mixed-ownership institutions
Journal of Management Studies, 43 (2006), pp. 1671-1702
Salas-Porras, 2006
A. Salas-Porras
Fuerzas centrípetas y centrífugas en la red corporativa mexicana (1981–2001)
Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 68 (2006), pp. 331-375
Santiago et al., 2009
M. Santiago,C.J. Brown,A. Baez
Prácticas de gobierno corporativo en América Latina
Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 43 (2009), pp. 26-40
Santiago and Brown, 2009
M. Santiago,C.J. Brown
An empirical analysis of Latin American board of directors and minority shareholders’ rights
Forum Empresarial, 14 (2009), pp. 1-18
Santos and da Silveira, 2007
R.L. Santos,A.D.M. da Silveira
Board interlocking no Brasil: A participacao de conselheiros em múltiplas companhias e seu efeito sobre o valor das empresas
Revista Brasileira de Financas, 5 (2007), pp. 125-163
Schneider, 2008
B.R. Schneider
Economic liberalization and corporate governance: The resilience of business groups in Latin America
Comparative Politics, 40 (2008), pp. 379-397
Seibert et al., 2001
S.E. Seibert,M.L. Kraimer,R.C. Liden
A social capital theory of career success
Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2001), pp. 219-237
Shleifer and Vishny, 1997
A. Shleifer,R.W. Vishny
A survey of corporate governance
The Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), pp. 737-783
Silva et al., 2006
F. Silva,N. Majluf,R.D. Paredes
Family ties, interlocking directors and performance of business groups in emerging countries: The case of Chile
Journal of Business Research, 59 (2006), pp. 315-321
Sirmon et al., 2007
D.G. Sirmon,M.A. Hitt,R.D. Ireland
Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box
Academy of Management Review, 32 (2007), pp. 273-292
Sonquist and Koenig, 1984
J.A. Sonquist,T. Koenig
Interlocking directorates in the top US corporations: A graph theory approach
Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 2 (1984), pp. 41-74
Tricker, 2009
B. Tricker
Corporate governance: Principles, policies and practices
Oxford University Press, (2009)
Tsai and Ghoshal, 1998
W. Tsai,S. Ghoshal
Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks
The Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1998), pp. 464-476
Uddin and Choudhury, 2008
S. Uddin,J. Choudhury
Rationality, traditionalism and the state of corporate governance mechanisms: Illustrations from a less developed country
Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21 (2008), pp. 1026-1105
Useem, 1984
M.C. Useem
The inner circle
Oxford University Press, (1984)
Uzzi, 1997
B. Uzzi
Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness
Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1997), pp. 35-67
Valenti and Horner, 2010
A. Valenti,S.V. Horner
Corporate directors’ social capital: How centrality and density impact board monitoring
Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 11 (2010), pp. 117-127
Zaheer and Bell, 2005
A. Zaheer,G.G. Bell
Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance
Strategic Management Journal, 26 (2005), pp. 809-825
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright generates two different rights: moral rights and patrimonial rights that EJFB recognizes and respects. Moral rights are those relating to the recognition of the authorship. They are rights of a personal nature that are perpetual, inalienable, unseizable and imprescriptible as consequence of the indivisible union of the author and his/her work. Patrimonial rights are those that can be derived from the reproduction, distribution, adaptation or communication of the work, among others.
Authors who publish in EJFB retain the copyright of their work and grant the right of its first publication to the journal in open access. EJFB is authorized to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or communicate the work under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License. This means that you are free to share and adapt this work under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to its author(s), which implie the right to be reconognized and cited correctly.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.