Ownership Control Eats Strategy and Culture for Lunch: The Case for Future Ownership Development Prior to Ownership Transition

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i1.12026

Keywords:

Ownership, Transition, Future, Culture
Agencies: NO

Abstract

A review of the academic research and practitioner best practices literature highlights how little we still know about the role that ownership control plays in the continuity of founder-controlled and family-controlled firms. Founder-controlled firms have been shown to financially outperform other firms. Allowing for more nuanced findings given the heterogeneity of family businesses, a similar advantage has been found in family-controlled firms around the world when their performance is contrasted with that of management-controlled firms. Research points to generational and family participation effects that may contribute to a gradual decline in this advantage over the generations. Still, controlling families of family firms face the prospect of leading a family-controlled firm across generations that continues to derive the financial and noneconomic benefits of such control or to squander that opportunity by not having ownership control be a fundamental consideration in their owners’ strategy when facing a generational transition. Statutory ownership control, psychological ownership and family unity approaches are all considered in an exploration of a future ownership development perspective and approaches that controlling families can take to preserve ownership control and the resulting comparative advantage evidenced in higher financial and noneconomic returns over generations.

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
386
Jun 19 '21Jun 22 '21Jun 25 '21Jun 28 '21Jul 01 '21Jul 04 '21Jul 07 '21Jul 10 '21Jul 13 '21Jul 16 '218
| |
HTML views
125
Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202641
|
Crossref
1

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
52%
33%
Days to publication 
112
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Uma Editorial, University of Malaga (Spain)

PFL

1 2 3 4 5
Not useful Very useful

References

Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567

Buffett, W. (1996). The owner’s manual. www.berkshire-hathaway.com

Credit Suisse Research Institute (2016). Credit Suisse/Bloomberg data and analysis.

Cruz, C., & Jimenez, L. (2017). What distinguishes family firms with high transgenerational potential: Best Latin American practices. Credit Suisse White Paper.

Daugherty, M. (2017). Financial and wealth management in the family business (chapter 14). In Poza, E., & Daugherty, M. (ed.). Family business (5th edition), 296-328. Cengage Publishing.

Easterbrook, F., & Fischell, D. (1982). Corporate control transactions. Yale Law Journal, 91(4), 698-739. (1981-1982). Available in: heinonline.org

Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106

Jeong, S., Kim, H., & Kim, H. (2021). Strategic nepotism in family director appointments: evidence from family business groups in South Korea. Academy of Management Journal, in press. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1418

Lin, K. (2015, August 17). The Big Number – Share of IPOs this year with dual-class stock structures. Wall Street Journal. Availabe in: http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-big-number-1439865699.

Madison, K., Kellermanns, F. W., & Munyon, T. (2017). Coexisting agency and stewardship governance in family firms. Family Business Review, 30(4), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517727422

McVey, H., & Draho, J. (2005). U.S. Family?run companies–They may be better than you think. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17(4), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00067.x

Poza, E., & Daugherty, M. (2017). Family business (5th edition). Cengage Publishing.

Schulze, W., Lubatkin, M., & Dino, R. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040613

Schulze, W., Lubatkin, M., Dino, R., & Buchholtz, A. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114

Suzuki, S. (1970). Zen mind, beginner’s mind: Informal talks on zen meditation and practice. Weatherhill.

Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005

Zook, C., & Allen, J. (2016). The founder’s mentality: How to overcome the predictable crises of growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-17

How to Cite

Poza-Valle, E. (2021). Ownership Control Eats Strategy and Culture for Lunch: The Case for Future Ownership Development Prior to Ownership Transition. European Journal of Family Business, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i1.12026

Issue

Section

Research article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.