Reflective Judgement and the Realisation of Freedom in Kant's Third Critique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/stheg.12.2026.22104Keywords:
Kant, Culture, Aesthetics, Freedom, Nature, TeleologyAbstract
This article deals with the project of the Critique of Judgment to critically establish the possibility of the realisation of freedom in the sensible world. From this perspective, the work highlights a faculty not explored in the two previous Critiques, reflective Judgement, in order to focus on the contributions of reflective aesthetic Judgement and reflective teleological Judgement to that project. The thesis that it seeks to defend is that the place identified by Kant as the sphere of connection between nature and freedom and the realisation of the latter in the former is the sphere of culture.
Downloads
Metrics
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universidad de Málaga
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
References
Alvarado, José (2021-2), “Kant y los fines de la cultura”, Revista de filosofía, 98, 388-422. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5528189.
Andaluz Romanillos, Ana Mª (2013). Las armonías de la razón en Kant: Libertad, Sentimiento de lo bello y Teleología de la naturaleza, Salamanca: Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca.
Andaluz Romanillos, Ana. Mª (1990). La finalidad de la naturaleza en Kant. Un estudio desde la Crítica del Juicio, Salamanca: Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca.
Caballero López, Daniel (2024). “La interpretación arquitectónica del tránsito
de la Crítica del Juicio, como argumento teórico y práctico”, Open Insight, XV/34, 81-116. https://doi.org/10.23924/oi.v15i34.635
Castillo, Monique (1990). Kant el l´avenir de la culture, París: PUF.
Conill, Jesús (2024). “Transformación hermenéutica del regreso a Kant. De la felicidad objetiva a la libertad de la razón crítica”, Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía, 51, 245-268. https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-955X.51.245
Conill, Jesús (2006). Ética hermenéutica. Crítica desde la facticidad, Madrid: Tecnos.
Dörflinger, Bernd (2023). “El problema del gran abismo entre naturaleza y libertad. ¿Qué aporta la Crítica del discernimiento a su solución?”, Revista de Estudios Kantianos, 8 (1), 218-237. https://doi.org/10.7203/REK.8.1.26503
Flach, Werner (2015). Kant zu Geschichte, Kultur und Recht [Hrsg. von Wolfgang Bock], Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Flórez, Cirilo (1975). “Kant y el surgimiento de las ciencias humanas”, Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía, 2, 7-94.
García Masip, Fernando (2009). “El conflicto conceptual entre cultura, civilización y Estado. Kant, Nietzsche y Freud”, Tramas, 31, 103-128.
González, Ana Marta (2014). “La filosofía kantiana como filosofía de la cultura”, Isegoría. Revista de filosofía moral y política, 51, 691-708. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2014.051.08González
González, Ana Marta (2011). Kant on Nature, Culture and Morality, Hildesheim: Olms.
González, Ana Marta (2004a). “La doble aproximación de Kant a la cultura”, Anuario Filosófico, XXXVII/3, 679-711. https://doi.org/10.15581/009.37.29359
González, Ana Marta (2004b). “Cultura y felicidad en Kant”, Teorema, XXIII/1-3, 215-232. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43046543
Heinz, Marion (1999). “Teorías de la cultura de la Ilustración: Herder y Kant”, Ideas y Valores, 109,119-133. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/21902/22869
Kant, Immanuel, Gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg.: Bd. 1-22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin 1900 ff.
Kant, Immanuel, Briefe (Br), AA 10-13.
Kant, Immanuel, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (GMS), AA 04.
Kant, Immanuel, Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht (IaG), AA 08.
Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (KpV), AA 05.
Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (KrV), Originalpaginierung A/B.
Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der Urteilskraft (KU), AA 05.
Kant, Immanuel, Mutmaßlicher Anfang der Menschengeschichte (MAM), AA 08.
Lerusi, Natalia (2018). “Insociable sociabilidad, mal moral y el origen de la historia humana según Kant”, Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy, 7 (13), 2018, 149-168. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/LTDL/article/view/76817/4564456557794
Sánchez Madrid, Nuria (2018). “El origen de la cultura en Kant. El hiato entre la vida y la moral”, Areté. Revista de Filosofía, XXX/1, pp. 23-42. https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.201801.002
Teruel, Pedro Jesús (2024). “El proteo de la naturaleza. La trayectoria kantiana hacia la noción de protomateria en el Opus Postumum, con algunas observaciones sobre la teoría de las afinidades en Suárez”, Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía, 51, 83-106. https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-955X.51.83
Teruel, Pedro Jesús (2021). “Critical Naturalism”. Pensamiento, monográfico “Practical Challenges of Neurophilosophy”, 77/295, 467-479. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v77.i295.y2021.002
Yovel, Yirmiyahu (1989): Kant et la philosophie de l´histoire, Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ana María Andaluz Romanillos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All contents published in Studia Hegeliana. Journal of the Spanish Society for Hegelian Studies, are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 licence (specifically, CC-by-nc-sa), the full text of which can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>. Derivative works are therefore permitted as long as they are not used for commercial purposes. The original work may not be used for commercial purposes. The journal is not responsible for the opinions expressed by the authors of the works published in it.
It is the authors' responsibility to obtain the necessary permissions for images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal retain the copyright. It is non-exclusive right to use their contributions for scholarly, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or deposit in open access repositories of any kind.
Since volume 7 of 2021 the journal Studia Hegeliana has changed the copyright. Since that year the authors have retained the copyright.
The electronic edition of this journal is published by the Editorial de la Universidad de Málaga (UmaEditorial), being necessary to cite the source in any partial or total reproduction.
244.png)
