Contingency, practice and political thought in Leibniz

Authors

  • Jaime de Salas Ortueta Universidad Complutense de Madrid Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/stheg.4.2018.11393

Keywords:

LEIBNIZ, NATURAL LAW, SUBSTANCE, CONTINGENCY, ACTION

Abstract

To what extent do Leibniz’s political activities find support in his metaphysics? To answer the question it is helpful to think of his activities as a part of a “practice” in which philosophical concepts are melded with a vision of the current political situation. The context permits, requires and limits this activity. Leibniz’s Metaphysics is akin to his political activities. The paper adresses this issue taking into account the concepts of contingency and liberty, and the ways in which truths of reason found truths of fact: as manifestations of the substance and as facts that are covered by laws. Leibniz’s concept of substance implies a concept of action which implies a vision of man in God’s image, which includes political activity. On the other hand Leibniz reformulates the classical idea of natural law distinguishing three degrees: just strictum, equitas and pietas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Álvarez Gómez, M. (2002): “El método dialéctico” en Ramón Rodríguez
(editor) Métodos del pensamiento ontológico, Madrid: 2002 pp. 89 a 143.
Armgardt, M (2015): “Die Rechtstheorie von Leibniz im Licht seiner Kritik
an Hobbes und Pufendorf” en Wenchao Li (Hg.) “Das Recht kann nicht
ungerecht sein… “ Beiträge zu Leibniz’s Philosophie der gerechtogkeit. Studia
Leibnitiana – Sonderhefte 44. Stuttgart: 2015, p. 13.
Baruzi, J (1907): Leibniz et l’organsation relígieuse de la terre, Paris: 1907.
Basso, L (2015): “Leibniz gegen Hobbes. Zwischen Justitia und Summa Potestas”
en Peter Nitschke (Hrsg.): Gottfried W., Leibniz: Die richtige Ordnung des
Staates. Baden-Baden 2015, p. 61.
Berlin, I (1969): Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: 1969.
Davillé (1909); Leibniz Historien. Paris: 1909
Cassirer, E.: The Philosophy of Enlightenment, Princeton: 2009.
Grua, G (1956): La justice humaine selon Leibniz, Paris: 2008.
Hunter, I.: Rival Enlightenments. Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in early
Enlightenment Germany, Cambridge: 2001.
Leibniz (1875): Die philosophischen Schriften von G.W. Leibniz herausgegeben
von C.I Gerhardt, Berlin: 1875.
Leibniz (1923): Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe herausgegeben von der deutschen
Akademie der Wissenchaften zu Berlin. Darmstadt, 1923-1931. Berlin: 1954.
1954..y ss. Se cita esta edición con la A.
Leibniz (2015): Sur la nature de la bonté et de la justice bearbeitet von Stefan
Lucksheiter en: “Das recht kann nicht ungerecht sein…” Wenchao Li (Hg.).-
Beiträge zu Leibniz Philosophie der Gerechtigkeit. Studia Leibnitiana.
Sonderhefte 44. Stuttgart, 2015 pp. 164 a 179.
Manuel, F y Manuel, F (1979): Utopian Thought in the western World,
Harvard, 1979.
Rateau, P. (2008): La question du mal chez Leibniz. Fondements et élaboration
de la Theodicée, Paris, 2008.
Roldán, C. y Moro, O. (2009): Aproximaciones a la Contingencia, Madrid,
2009.
Salas, J de (1994): Razón y Leigitimidad en Leibniz, Madrid 1994.
Schneiders, W (1978): “Vera Política. Grundlagen der Politiktheorie bei G.W.
Leibniz” en Recht und Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Helmut Schelsky, Berlin,
1978, p. 600.

Published

2018-12-01

How to Cite

de Salas Ortueta, J. (2018). Contingency, practice and political thought in Leibniz. STUDIA HEGELIANA. JOURNAL OF THE SPANISH SOCIETY FOR HEGELIAN STUDIES, 4, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.24310/stheg.4.2018.11393