Innovating with meaning, the challenge of educational transformation: some key elements. A multi-case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/mgnmar.v3i3.15036Keywords:
pedagogical renovation, case study, community of practiceAbstract
Educational innovation is in vogue, but not all proposals are the same. There are many trends with different objectives. Some only change the surface and little else. But there are examples of global renewal in which the educational community participates. And they are not utopian, they are realistic and exist all around us. Our study focuses on three committed schools that live change as a shared process with characteristics and results that can be inspiring for other initiatives.
Downloads
Metrics
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universidad de Málaga
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
References
Blackshields, D. (2015). Integrative learning: International research and practice. Routledge.
Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. The University of Chicago Press.
Copland, M. A. (2003) Leadership of inquiry: building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004375
Elder?Vass, D. (2008). Integrating institutional, relational, and embodied structure: An emergentist perspective. British Journal of Sociology, 59 (2), 281 299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00194.x
Feito, R., Rujas, J., & Sánchez-Rojo, A. (2021). Jornadas de puertas abiertas: La presentación de los centros educativos en sociedad. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 29(86). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.6117
Feu, J. & Torrent, A. (2021). Renovación pedagógica, innovación y cambio en educación: de qué estamos hablando. En J. Feu y J.M. Palaudárias (coords.), La renovación pedagógica en España. Una mirada crítica y actual (pp. 19-54). Morata.
Fix, G.M., Rikkerink, M., Pieters, J.M. y Kuiper, W. (2021). Learning within sustainable educational innovation: An analysis of teachers’ perceptions and leadership practice. Journal of Educational Change, 22, 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09410-2
Hill, K. L, Desimone, L., Wolford, T. et al. (2022). Inside school turnaround: what drives succes? Journal of Educational Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09450-w
Hübner, N., Wagner, W., Hochweber, J., Neumann, M., & Nagengast, B. (2020). Comparing apples and oranges: Curricular intensification reforms can change the meaning of students’ grades! Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000351
Haapaniemi, H.; Venäläinen, S.; Malin A. & Palojoki, P. (2021). Teacher autonomy and collaboration as part of integrative teaching – Reflections on the curriculum approach in Finland. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(4), 546-562, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1759145
Klette, K. (2009). Challenges in strategies for complexity reduction in video studies. Experiences from the PISA+ study: A video study of teaching and learning in Norway. In T. Janík & T. Seidel (Eds.), The Power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp 61-82). Waxmann.
Monanero, M. (2019). Métodos pedagógicos emergentes para un nuevo siglo ¿Qué hay realmente de innovación?. Teoría de la Educación, 31 (1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.19758
Pérez Gómez, Á. I. (2004). La cultura escolar en la sociedad neoliberal. Morata.
Pérez Gómez, Á.I. (2012). Educarse en la era digital. Morata.
Pérez Gómez, Á. I. y Soriano, E. (2021). Lesson Study. Aprender a enseñar para enseñar a aprender. Morata.
Pozuelos, F. J., Romero, D., García, F. J. y Morcillo, V. (2010). No basta con soñar otra escuela, hay que hacerla. Investigación en la Escuela, 70, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2010.i70.01
Pozuelos Estrada, F. J., & García Prieto, F. J. (2020). Currículum integrado: estrategias para la práctica. Investigación en la Escuela, (100), 37–54. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/IE.2020.i100.04
Sánchez Gómez, P. J. (2022). La reacción educativa. El País. https://bit.ly/3NY6NXj
Sarason, S. (2003). El predecible fracaso de la reforma educativa. Octaedro.
Simons, H. (2011). El estudio de caso: teoría y práctica. Morata.
Sivesind, K., Afsar, A., & Bachmann, K. E. (2016). Transnational policy transfer over three curriculum reforms in Finland: The constructions of conditional and purposive programs (1994–2016). European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116648175
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovationin the public sector. Administration and Society, 43(8), 842- 868.
Stake, R. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford Press.
Timperley, H. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500038545
Trillas, J. (2018). La moda reaccionaria en educación. Laertes.
Trujillo, F. (2019). ¿Cómo son los colegios más innovadores de España? The Conversation. https://bit.ly/3NmVE1J
Vázquez Recio, R., Picazo Gutiérrez, M., & López-Gil, M. (2021). Estudio de casos e innovación educativa: un encuentro hacia la mejora educativa. Investigación en La Escuela, 105, 1-10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2021.i105.01
Wallace, W. & Priestley, M. (2011). Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum innovation in Scotland: A socio?cultural perspective on professional development and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 357-381, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.563447
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The editorial team of Márgenes supports an open Access policy of scientific knowledge. apostamos claramente por una política de acceso abierto del conocimiento científico (see Berlin Declaration).
Authors with work published in this journal accept the following conditions:
- This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All contents published in Márgenes are subject to the Creative Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or deposit in open-access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial of the University of Malaga (UmaEditorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
- Authors can enter into other additional independent contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g. including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) on the condition that they clearly indicate that the work was originally published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), before and after the publication, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).
