Pensiero progettuale: Innovazione e protezione delle idees

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Idiseno.2021.v16i.13084

Palabras clave:

Design Thinking, derechos de propiedad, tecnología digital, metodología

Resumen

Desde un enfoque de Design Thinking, este artículo pretende explicar cómo los procesos creativos en las organizaciones, expresados en un contexto de efervescencia de los derechos de propiedad, requieren la formulación de métodos más rigurosos de obtención y evaluación de la información, que permitan mitigar los efectos asimétricos y la pérdida de eficiencia y eficacia de los esfuerzos realizados por las empresas. Se analizan tres posibles intervenciones para que el proceso creativo genere conocimientos valiosos. Las ideas pueden patentarse durante las fases iniciales: orientación del pensamiento creativo, uso de la tecnología a través de herramientas de registro digital y estrategias empresariales sostenibles centradas en el comportamiento humano. Se concluye que partir de un pensamiento de diseño requiere sistematizar e incorporar mayor rigor en el proceso creativo para facilitar los procesos de registro de derechos de propiedad sobre un producto original de la organización. 

A partire da un approccio di Design Thinking, questo articolo mira a spiegare come i processi creativi nelle organizzazioni, espressi in un contesto di effervescenza dei diritti di proprietà, richiedono la formulazione di metodi più rigorosi per ottenere e valutare le informazioni, che permettono l’attenuazione degli effetti asimmetrici e la perdita di efficienza ed efficacia degli sforzi fatti dalle aziende. Si analizzano tre possibili interventi affinché il processo creativo generi un prezioso know-how. Le idee possono ricevere un trattamento organizzato durante le fasi iniziali: guida del pensie­ro creativo, uso della tecnologia attraverso strumenti di registro digitale, e strategie aziendali sostenibili focalizzate sul comportamento umano. Si conclude che partire da un pensiero progettuale richiede la sistematizzazione e l’incorporazione di un mag­gior rigore nel processo creativo per facilitare i processi di registrazione dei diritti di proprietà su un prodotto originale dell’organizzazione.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Alfaro, M., Vargas, M., Gutierrez, S., Ternero, R. and Sabattin, J. (2020). Conceptual Framework for the Strategic Management: A Literature Review—Descriptive. Journal of Engineering, 2020.

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8 (2).

Chavaglia, J., Filipe, J. and Bento Caleiro, A. (2019). Creativity and innovation: A contribution of behavioral economics. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3 (1), 12-21.

Ciani, O., Armeni, P., Boscolo, P., Cavazza, M., Jommi, C. and Tarricon, R. (2016). De innovatione: The concept of innovation for medical technologies and its implications for healthcare policy-making. Health Policy and Technology, 5 (1), 47-64.

Dorst, K. (2019). Design beyond Design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5 (2), 117-127.

Dwivedi, Y. et al. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102-168.

Gassmann, O. and Bader, M. (2006). Patentmanagement. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

Hall, BH. (2007) Patents and patent policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 23, issue 4 (pp. 568–587).

Johnson, JP. (2004) Defensive publishing by a leading firm. Working paper. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Kempe, M. and Kempe, D. (2018). “Good, better, creative”: the influence of creativity on goal scoring in elite soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36 (3), 1-5.

Meyer, M. and Norman, D. (2020). Changing Design Education for the 21st Century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6 (1), 13-49.

Mohr, J. (2001). Marketing of high-technology products and innovations. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

Nelson B. A., Yen J., Wilson J. O. & Rosen D. (2009). Refined Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 30 (6), 737-743.

Royalty A. and Roth B. (2015). Developing Design Thinking Metrics as a Driver of Creative Innovation. New York: Springer International Publishing.

Schmiedgen, J., Spille, L-, Köppen, E., Rhinow, H. & Meinel, C. (2016). Measuring the impact of design thinking. In Plattner H, Meinel C, & Leifer L (eds.): Design Thinking Research: Making Design Thinking Foundational (pp. 157-170). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Schönhals, A., Hepp, T. and Gipp, B. (2018). Design Thinking using the Blockchain: Enable Traceability of Intellectual Property in Problem-Solving Processes for Open Innovation. CryBlock'18: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed SystemsJune (pp. 105-110).

Sözbilir, F. (2018). The interaction between social capital, creativity and efficiency in organizations. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, pp. 92-100.

Teixeira, A. and Ferreira, C. (2019). Intellectual property rights and the competitiveness of academic spin-offs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4 (3), pp. 154-161.

Totten, J. and Zhai, M. (2014). Recent developments in the interplay between patents and standards-setting. Chicago: IEEE.

Ulrich, K. (2012). Diseño y desarrollo de productos. México: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Vargas-Hernandez N., Shah JJ. & Smith SM. (2010). Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies. Design Studies, Vol. 31 (pp. 382– 410).

Wang, Y., and Chiew, V. (2008). On the cognitive process of human problem-solving. Cognitive Systems Research. Vol. 11, issue 1 (pp. 81-92).

Ylitalo, P. (2017). Value Creation Metrics in Systematic Idea Generation. Acta Univiversitatis Ouluensis, C 611.

Yoon, B., and Park, Y. (2004). A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high technology trend. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15 (1), 37-50.

Descargas

Publicado

2021-12-16

Cómo citar

Méndez Reátegui, R., & Álvarez Meythaler, A. (2021). Pensiero progettuale: Innovazione e protezione delle idees. I+Diseño. Revista Científico-Académica Internacional De Innovación, Investigación Y Desarrollo En Diseño, 16, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.24310/Idiseno.2021.v16i.13084

Número

Sección

Artículos académico-científicos