Where Have all the Families Gone— Is There a Future for Family Businesses?
In this essay, the author describes some of the trends regarding the family that he has witnessed over his lifetime as well as raise some questions concerning family formation, structure, and size that may influence the creation and sustainability of family businesses. Moreover, he makes some suggestions for those who, like himself, would like to see family businesses survive and thrive in the future.
Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (1997). A generation at risk: growing up in an era of family upheaval. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020191
Brown, S. L. (2004). Family structure and child well-being: the significance of parental cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66(2), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00025.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00025.x
Brown, S. L., Manning, W. D., & Payne, K. K. (2014). Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1730-1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15622236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15622236
Cherlin, A. J. (2010). The marriage-go-round: the state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Vintage Books.
Dyer, W. G. (2019). The family edge: how your biggest competitive advantage in business isn’t what you have been taught—It’s your family. Sanger, CA: Familius.
Fairlie, R. W., & Robb, A. M. (2008). Race and entrepreneurial success. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7961.001.0001
Graff, N. (2019). Key findings on marriage and cohabitation in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/11/06/key-findings-on-marriage-and-cohabitation-in-the-u-s/
Hawkins, M. E. A. J. (2015). Does it work? Effectiveness research on relationship and marriage education. In J. J. Ponzetti Jr. (Ed.). Evidence-based approaches to relationship and marriage education (pp. 82-96). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757353-12
Hudson, V. M., & Den Boer, A. M. (2004). Bare branches: the security implications of Asia’s surplus male population. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Hvistendahl, M. (2011). Unnatural selection: Choosing boys over girls, and the consequences of a world full of men. New York: Public Affairs.
Larson, J. H. (2001). The verdict on cohabitation vs. marriage. Marriage & Families, 4(1), 7-12. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/marriageandfamilies/vol4/iss1/3
Lillard, L. A., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Til death do us part: marital disruption and mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1131-1156. https://doi.org/10.1086/230634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/230634
Marripedia (2019). The effects of cohabitation on children. http://marripedia.org/effects_of_cohabitation_on_children#
Rapp, I., & Stauder, J. (2020). Mental and physical health in couple relationships: Is it better to live together? European Sociological Review, 36(2), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz047
Stanley, S. M., & Rhoads, G. (2018). Premarital cohabitation is still associated with greater odds of divorce. Institute for Family Studies. https://ifstudies.org/blog/premarital-cohabitation-is-still-associated-with-greater-odds-of-divorce
Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., & Markman, H. J. (2004). Maybe I do: interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25(4), 496-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X0325779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03257797
Waite, L. J. (1996). Social science finds: “marriage matters”. Responsive Community, 6, 26-36.
Wilcox, W. B., Wang, W., & Rowe, I. (2021). Less poverty, less prison, core college: what two parents mean for black and white children. Institute for Family Studies https://ifstudies.org/blog/less-poverty-less-prison-more-college-what-two-parents-mean-for-black-and-white-children
Copyright (c) 2022 Gibb Dyer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright generates two different rights: moral rights and patrimonial rights that EJFB recognizes and respects. Moral rights are those relating to the recognition of the authorship. They are rights of a personal nature that are perpetual, inalienable, unseizable and imprescriptible as consequence of the indivisible union of the author and his/her work. Patrimonial rights are those that can be derived from the reproduction, distribution, adaptation or communication of the work, among others.
Authors who publish in EJFB retain the copyright of their work and grant the right of its first publication to the journal in open access. EJFB is authorized to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or communicate the work under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License. This means that you are free to share and adapt this work under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to its author(s), which implie the right to be reconognized and cited correctly.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.