Truth is what the context makes of it

Authors

  • Keith Allan Monash University Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Claridadescrf.v14i2.13620

Keywords:

Fuzzu Truth, Alternative Truths, Incontrovertible Truhts, Ideologies, Weltangschuungen, Context

Abstract

This essay shows that truth cannot be divorced from human experience and an individual’s world view, his or her weltanschauung. There exist different weltanschauungen that favour alternative truths. Thus, loosely speaking, truth is determined by context. It may be socially acceptable to prefer one among the alternative truths as truly true, but this goal necessarily involves taking an ideological perspective on what is perceived and accepted as the sole truth. In other words, it is prejudiced. The truth value assigned to the proposition God exists starkly illustrates this claim, but in the course of this essay I demonstrate that alternative truths are widespread and that conflicting truths can co-exist within a community even when they create dissension. A hegemonic group will assert a preference for one truth over its alternatives, but that does not eliminate the existence of alternative truths. Alternative weltanschauungen need to be managed somehow, and the recognition that alternative truths exist is one step in their management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Allan, K. (2001) Natural Language Semantics. Oxford & Malden MA: Blackwell.

Allan, K. (2018) Getting a grip on context as a determinant of meaning. In A. Capone, M. Carapezza and F. Lo Piparo (eds) Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy. Part 1. From Theory to Practice, Cham: Springer, pp. 177-201.

Allan, K. (2020a) On cups. In K. Allan (ed.) Dynamic Language Changes: Looking Within and Across Languages, Singapore: Springer Nature, pp. 125-137.

Allan, K. (2020b) The semantics and pragmatics of three potential slurring terms. In K. Mullan, B. Peeters and L. Sadow (eds) Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication: Ethnopragmatics and Semantic Analysis, Singapore: Springer, pp. 163-183.

Allan, K. (2021) [online] The interdependence of common ground and context. http://users.monash.edu.au/~kallan/papers/cg-c.pdf.

Aristotle (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. by Jonathan Barnes.

Bollingen Series 71. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Davidson, D. (1967) Truth and meaning. Synthese 17: 304-23.

Durrell, L. (2012) The Alexandria Quartet. [First published 1962]. London Faber & Faber.

Einstein, A. (1973) Ideas and Opinions. Laurel edn. New York: Dell. [First published 1954].

Giora, R. (2003) On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gray, J. (1992) Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus: a practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships. New York: HarperCollins.

Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.

Hawking, S.W. (1988) A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. London: Bantam.

Hume, D. (1760) Of the standard of taste. In Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects. Vol. I. London: A. Millar, pp. 363-395.

Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science. 2nd edn. Chicago: Chicago University Press [First edn 1962.].

Lewis, D. (1968) Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy 65: 113-126.

Lewis, D. (1986) On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Locke, J. (1694) An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding: In Four Books. 2nd edn. London: For Thomas Dring and Samuel Manship.

Moore, G.E. (1902) Truth. In J.M. Baldwin (ed.) Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. Vol. 2, London: Macmillan, pp. 716-718.

Pirsig, R.M. (1976) Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. London: Corgi.

Putnam, H. (1962) It ain’t necessarily so. Journal of Philosophy 59: 658-71.

Quine, W.V.O. (1960) Word and Object. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Searle, J.R. (1980) The background of meaning. In J.R. Searle, F. Kiefer and M. Bierwisch (eds) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 221-232.

Shapin, S. (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Strawson, P.F. (1950). On referring. Mind 59: 320–44.

Tarski, A. (1956). The concept of truth in formalized languages. In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923-1938. Transl. by J.H. Woodger. Oxford Clarendon Press, pp. 152-278.

Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338-353.

Zadeh, L.A. (1971) Quantitative fuzzy semantics. Information Sciences 3: 159-176.

Zadeh, L.A. (1972) A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. Journal of Cybernetics 2: 4–34.

Published

2022-11-14

How to Cite

Allan, K. (2022). Truth is what the context makes of it. Claridades. Revista De filosofía, 14(2), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.24310/Claridadescrf.v14i2.13620

Issue

Section

STUDIES