Remediations of the Image: Audiovisualizations and (Dis)Appropriations of the History of Art and the Visual Culture

Authors

  • Renato Bermúdez Dini Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México Mexico
  • Marilyn Payrol Morán Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Mexico
  • Alma Cardoso Martínez Mexico https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9908-7964

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/umatica.2024.v6i7.21030

Keywords:

Ways of Seeing, remediation, image, audiovisualization, (dis)pppropriations, television, art history, visual culture

Abstract

The appearance of the television series Ways of Seeing in 1972, and the subsequent book of the same name, represented a radical intervention in the canonical narratives of art history that quickly became a project as admired as it was criticized. More than fifty years later, Ways of Seeing continues to arouse interest for the irreverent strategies it implemented: image remediation and montage, collaborative writing, modes of (dis)appropriation, and other non-linear ways of narrating art history from critically situated experiences.

Although these characteristics positioned Ways of Seeing as a crucial reference in the English-speaking world, in the Spanish-speaking context this influence does not seem to have had the same extent. In order to contribute to the debate on the relevance and validity of Ways of Seeing, the seventh issue of Umática integrates a set of reflections on different remediations of images, especially from Latin America and Spain. These are investigations based on exercises and experiments that dodge the conceptual and institutional architecture of authorship, ownership, genius and the male gaze, among other characteristics of the canon of Western art history.

In order to approach the remediation of images from this particular perspective, we have situated the debate around two fundamental notions: the audiovisualization of art history and the (dis)appropriation of visual culture. As complementary processes, these notions operate transversally throughout the different discussions of this monograph. Following Ways of Seeing, this issue brings together works that go beyond disciplinary boundaries and admit approaches such as the political philosophy of the image, feminist positions, reflections on audiovisual ecologies, reconceptualization of archives, critical pedagogy initiatives and other theoretical and methodological perspectives that, from their hybridity, venture into the various experiments opened up by the processes of audiovisualization of art history and (dis)appropriation of visual culture. This is neither a tribute nor an exhaustive review of Ways of Seeing, but rather the exploration of its possible remediations, contradictions and readjustments, more than fifty years after its appearance and in latitudes that surpass its frame of origin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bolter, J. D. y Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation. Understanding New Media. The MIT Press.

Boyle, D. (1997). Subject to Change. Guerrilla Television Revisited. Oxford University Press.

Conlin, J. (2020). Lost in Transmission? John Berger and the Origins of Ways of Seeing (1972). History Workshop Journal, 90. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbaa020

Dyer, G. (1986). Ways of Telling: The Work of John Berger. Pluto Press.

Enzensberger, H. M. (1981). Elementos para una teoría de los medios de comunicación. Editorial Anagrama.

Fuller, P. (1981). Seeing Berger. A Revaluation of Ways of Seeing. Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.

Gould, S. y Leblond, D. (Eds.). (2023). Fifty Years of Seeing with John Berger. Études britanniques contemporaines, (65). https://doi.org/10.4000/ebc.13853

Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. [Discussion Paper]. University of Birmingham.

Kalkstein, M. (2019). Aby Warburg’s Mnemosyne Atlas: On Photography, Archives, and the Afterlife of Images. Rutgers Art Review, 35. 50-73.

Karlholm, D. (2010). Developing the Picture: Wölfflin’s Performance Art. Photography and Culture, 3(2), 207-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175145110X12700318320512

Kember, S. y Zylinska, J. (2012). Life After New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process. The MIT Press.

Levin, E. (2022). The Channeled Image. Art and Media Politics after Television. The University of Chicago Press

López Cuenca, A. (2018). ¿De quiénes son las imágenes? La Historia del arte en la era Betamax. En García Pérez, V. (Ed.), La vorágine de las imágenes. Accesos, circuitos, controles, archivos y autorías en el arte (pp. 17-41). Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes.

López Cuenca, A. y Bermúdez Dini, R. (Eds.). (2024). Nociones en común. Hacia un glosario para liberar la cultura. Centro de Cultura Digital.

McCarthy, A. (2001). Ambient television: Visual Culture and Public Space. Duke University Press.

Mitchell, W. J. T. (1986). Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. University of Chicago Press.

Negt, O., y Kluge, A. (1993). Public Sphere and Experience. Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. The University of Minnesota Press.

Parks, L. y Schwoch, J. (2012). Down to Earth. Satellite Technologies, Industries, and Cultures. Rutgers University Press.

Pehlivan, S. y Şener, D. K. (2014). Photography and art history: the history of art born from photography. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 210–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1329

Pollock, G. (1988). Vision and Difference. Feminism, Femininity and Histories of Art. Routledge.

Preziosi, D. (1989). Rethinking Art History. Meditations on a Coy Science. Yale University Press.

Ramírez, J. A. (1976). Medios de masas e historia del arte. Cátedra.

Rees, A. L. y Borzello, F. (Eds.). (1986). The New Art History. Camden Press.

Rivera Garza, C. (2013). Los muertos indóciles. Necroescrituras y desapropiación. Tusquets Editores.

Rivera Garza, C. (2021). Desapropiación para principiantes. Thesavrvs, 60(1), 106-116. https://thesaurus.caroycuervo.gov.co/index.php/rth/article/view/16

Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and Everyday Life. Routledge.

Spampinato, F. (2022). Art vs. TV. A Brief History of Contemporary Artists’ Responses to Television. Bloomsbury.

Sperling, J. (2019). Ways of Living. https://aeon.co/essays/john-bergers-ways-of-seeing-and-his-search-for-home

Spigel, L. (1992). Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Streeter, T. (1996). Selling the Air. A Critique of the Policy of Commercial Broadcasting in the United States. The University of Chicago Press.

Thomson, B. (1979). Television and the Teaching of Art History. The Oxford Art Journal, 2(3), 46-49.

Walker, J. A. (1993). Arts TV: A History of Arts Television in Britain. John Libbey.

Williams, R. (1974). Television: Technology and Cultural Form. Routledge.

Wood, C. (2019). A History of Art History. Princeton University Press.

Wyver, J. (2007). Vision On. Film, Television and the Arts in Britain. Wallflowers Press.

Zielinski, S. (1999). Audiovisions. Cinema and Television as Entr'Actes in History. Amsterdam University Press.

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Bermúdez Dini , R., Payrol Morán, M., & Cardoso Martínez, A. (2024). Remediations of the Image: Audiovisualizations and (Dis)Appropriations of the History of Art and the Visual Culture. UMÁTICA. Journal on Image Creation and Analysis, (7). https://doi.org/10.24310/umatica.2024.v6i7.21030