Modal Foundationalism in Brandom´s Interpretation of Hegel


  • Mert Yirmibe? Mardin Artuklu University Turquía


Palabras clave:

Modalidad, Incompatibilidad, Negación determinada, Diferencia, Fundacionalismo


Brandom’s reading of Hegel’s metaphysics offers an excitingly rich interpretation within the context of contemporary modal metaphysics. Brandom reads Hegel’s determinate negation in the way that the concepts of material incompatibility and material consequence relations operate. Brandom recognizes incompatibility as a modal concept and places it as a primitive in the foundation of Hegel’s metaphysics. This paper examines of Brandom’s modal foundationalist claim in comparison to how Hegel conceives of modality in his Logic. Upon this examination, the paper suggests that Brandom’s interpretation remains problematically indifferent to the anti-foundationalist aspect of Hegel’s Logic and Hegel’s understanding of modality.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.


Cargando métricas ...


Brandom, R.,“Some Hegelian Ideas of Note for Contemporary Analytic Philosophy”, Hegel Bulletin. vol. 35, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1–15. doi:10.1017/hgl.2014.1.
Brandom, R., From Empiricism to Expressivism: Brandom reads Sellars, Harvard University Press 2015.
Brandom, R. A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2019.
Hegel, G.W.F., The Encyclopaedia Logic, with the Zusatze. Trans. Geraets, T., Suchting, W., and Harris, H., Indianapolis: Hackett 1991.
Hegel, G.W.F., The Science of Logic. Trans. Di Giovanni, G.. New York: Cambridge University Press 2010.
Hegel, G.W.F., Wissenschaft der Logik II, Germany: Suhrkamp 2017.
Kant, I., The Critique of Pure Reason. trans. and ed. Guyer, P. and Wood, W.A.. Cambridge University Press 2018.
Pippin, R., “Brandom on Hegel and Negation”, in Reading Brandom: On A Spirit of Trust. ed. Bouché, G., Routledge: New York 2020, pp. 11-28.




Cómo citar

Yirmibe?, M. (2023). Modal Foundationalism in Brandom´s Interpretation of Hegel . Studia Hegeliana, 9, 65–74.