Ecosistema diseño circular. El diseño como disciplina estratégica para la transformación de las políticas públicas de economía circular en Canarias.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/idiseo.20.2025.22293Keywords:
Diseño Circular, Canarias, Ecosistema, Economía Circular, Políticas PúblicasAbstract
The concept of an ecosystem, understood as a networked system composed of various interconnected elements, is fundamental to understanding the complex relationships that arise between actors within these exchange networks. In this context, design plays a central role as an articulator of actors, processes, and resources, facilitating solutions adapted to the territorial particularities of an ecosystem. From a peripheral perspective, it is particularly important to examine how design can emerge as a strategic tool for local development, especially in contexts related to the circular economy. To advance this understanding, it is useful to address how a circular design ecosystem is structured in a peripheral context. This study aims to propose a model that represents the Circular Design Ecosystem in the Canary Islands (Spain), understanding a model to be a structured and organised representation that identifies and classifies the different types of actors and actions linked to this ecosystem. To achieve this, a mapping of agents was carried out with the Research and Innovation Group in Design at the University of La Laguna, interviews with experts and interest groups, and a collaborative workshop funded by the Institutional Chair of Environment and Sustainable Development (Cabildo de Tenerife) where the actors, actions, opportunities and challenges of the ecosystem were identified. The results provided a deep understanding of the infrastructure of circular design in the Canary Islands, showing how it is shaped by vernacular, entrepreneurial and collaborative logics, typical of peripheral contexts, and highlighting the need for governance models that effectively integrate design into decision-making. In conclusion, it is highlighted that when design places life at the centre of its processes (Life-Centered Design), it positions the discipline as strategic, especially in the formulation of public policies for the circular economy.
Downloads
Metrics
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universidad de Málaga
References
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. PubMed, 84(4), 98–107; 148. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16579417
Adner, R., y Kapoor, R. (2009). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
Barbero, S., y Bicocca, M. (2017). Systemic design approach in policy-making for sustainable territorial development. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3496–S3506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352853
Basole, R. C., y Karla, J. (2011). On the evolution of mobile platform ecosystem structure and strategy. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 3(5), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-011-0174-4
Bonsiepe, G. (1985). El Diseño de la Periferia. Debates y Experiencias. Barcelona: Ed. Gustavo Gili.
Brown, T., y Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797x_12_1_29
Candela Sanjuán, B. (2017). Sistema diseño canario. Aportaciones para una política en diseño en la Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias (Tesis doctoral, Universidad de La Laguna, Canarias, España). Recuperada de https://portalciencia.ull.es/documentos/5e3170352999523690ffe47a
Carayannis, E. G., y Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘quadruple helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374
Chisolm, J., Mortati, M., y Villari, B. (2012). DeEP glossary. Describing the system of European design policy [Informe]. Comisión Europea, proyecto Design in European Policy.
De Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., De Faria, A. M., Braz, A. C., Marotti De Mello, A., Mendes Borini, F., y Ometto, A. R. (2022). Circular ecosystem management: Orchestrating ecosystem value proposition and configuration. International Journal of Production Economics, 256, 108725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108725
De Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., y Ikenami, R. K. (2016). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
Espinosa Sáez, D. (2024). Economía colaborativa y ecosistemas de innovación como catalizadores para la co-creación de valor y competitividad empresarial (Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España). Recuperada de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=351885
Holierhoek, S. E., y Price, R. A. (2019). The role of design in policy making. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.06.313
Jaimes, J. C. B. (2022). Innovación pública y pensamiento de diseño para políticas públicas en el contexto de desarrollo de ciudad. Revista Digital De Derecho Administrativo, (29), 235–271. https://doi.org/10.18601/21452946.n29.11
Jiménez, C. (2014). Cultura del diseño y desarrollo local sostenible: aportes teóricos, metodológicos y casos prácticos en las Islas Canarias. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de La Laguna.
Love, T. (2005). Design infrastructure: Australian developments. En 2005 IDC New Design Paradigms, Douliou, Taiwán. International Association of Societies of Design Research.
Margolin, V. (1998). Design for a Sustainable World. Design Issues, 14(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511853
Margolin, V. (2007). Design, the Future and the Human Spirit. Design Issues, 23(3), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2007.23.3.4
Mollenhauer, K. (2007). Sistema de innovación Design Driven [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Barcelona].
Mollenhauer, K. (2013). El sistema de innovación design_driven como modelo estratégico y la propuesta de política nacional de diseño para Chile 2007. Revista Chilena de Diseño, 0(3). https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-2430.2013.42661
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business School Press eBooks. http://blogs.harvard.edu/jim/files/2010/04/Predators-and-Prey.pdf
Naderifar, M., Goli, H., y Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670
Papanek, V. (1977). Design for the Real World. Thames and Hudson Ltd.
Parker, C., Scott, S., y Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. SAGE Research Methods Foundations. https://methods.sagepub.com/foundations/
Predassi, S., y Fernández, J. B. (2024). Implementación de economía circular en la industria. Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico y Social, 5, 037. https://doi.org/10.24215/26838559e037
Royal Society for Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA). (2016). The Great Recovery | Re-designing the future. http://www.greatrecovery.org.uk/
Thakur, P., y Wilson, V. H. (2023). Circular innovation ecosystem: A multi-actor, multi-peripheral and multi-platform perspective. Environment Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 14327–14350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03196-y
Trevisan, A. H., Gonçalves Castro, C., Gomes, L. A. V., y Mascarenhas, J. (2021). Unlocking the circular ecosystem concept: Evolution, current research, and future directions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.020
Van Dam, K., Simeone, L., Keskin, D., Baldassarre, B., Niero, M., y Morelli, N. (2020). Circular economy in industrial design research: A review. Sustainability, 12(24), 10279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410279
Walker, S. (2014). Designing sustainability. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797328
Whicher, A. (2017). Design ecosystems and innovation policy in Europe. Strategic Design Research Journal, 10(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2017.102.04
Whicher, A., Harris, C., Beverley, K., y Swiatek, P. (2017). Design for circular economy: Developing an action plan for Scotland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3237–3248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.009
Wurster, S., Heß, P., Nauruschat, M., y Jütting, M. (2020). Sustainable circular mobility: User-integrated innovation and specifics of electric vehicle owners. Sustainability, 12(19), 7900. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197900
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Verónica González Quintero, Bernardo Antonio Candela Sanjuán

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).

14.png)