Using PLS-SEM to Model Family Business Behavior When Addressing the Protocol

Authors

  • Maria-Isabel Rodríguez-Zapatero Universidad de Córdoba Spain
  • Leonor Pérez-Naranjo Universidad de Córdoba Spain
  • Magdalena Rodríguez-Jiménez Universidad de Córdoba Spain
  • Isabel Ramírez-Faz Universidad de Córdoba Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v8i2.5567

Keywords:

Family business, Protocol, Theory of planned behavior
Agencies: Not

Abstract

This study focuses on the factors that lead family business to address a family protocol. This paper applies the theory of planned behavior. To test the validity of this theory in predicting family business behavior, this research uses data collected from a questionnaire distributed to business family members (n = 98) from Córdoba, Spain. Firstly, this research aims to explain the paradigm in which the intentionality to start the process towards the protocol on generational replacement and future distribution of the ownership is conducted by its feasibility – and this is partially marked by the willingness to reach the agreement and its utility. Secondly, the hypotheses are confirmed by means of the analysis of the data gathered from a sample of business families. Thirdly, the results of the model applied in the study are discussed, as well as its consistency and the nature of the information used by means of PLS-SEM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Maria-Isabel Rodríguez-Zapatero, Universidad de Córdoba

Maribel. Rodríguez Zapatero, Ph.D. in Business Administration from the University of Córdoba, Spain. She is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Tourism, department of Business Management at the University of Córdoba. Her research focuses on Tourism and Hospitality Marketing and Management and Family Business. She has contributed to a wide range of research projects, conferences, book chapters and journal articles.

Leonor Pérez-Naranjo, Universidad de Córdoba

Leonor M. Pérez, Ph.D. in Business Administration from the University of Córdoba, Spain. She is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Tourism, department of Business Management at the University of Córdoba. Her research focuses on Tourism and Hospitality Marketing and Management. She has contributed to a wide range of research projects, conferences, book chapters and journal articles.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 179–211.

Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27-58.

Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.

Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behavior: Reflections and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26(9), 1113-1127.

Aldrich & Cliff. (2003). The pervasive effects of family entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of business Venturing, 18, 573-596.

Armitage, C. J. (2009). Is there utility in the transtheoretical model? British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 195-210.

Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499.

Astrachan, J. H. (2003). Commentary on the special issue: The emergence of a field. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 576-572.

Baggozi et al. (1989). An investigation into the role of intentions as mediators of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(1), 35-62.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Beehr, T. A., Drexler, J. A. and Faulkner, S. (1997). Working in small family businesses: empirical comparisons to non-family businesses. J. Organiz. Behav, 18: 297–312.

Berent-Braun, M. M., & Uhlaner, L. M. (2012). Family governance practices and teambuilding: paradox of the enterprising family. Small Bus Econ, 38, 103–119.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.

Botero, I. C., Gomez Betancourt, G.; Betancourt Ramirez, J. B. & Lopez Vergara, M. P. (2015). Family protocols as governance tools: understanding why and how family protocols are important in family firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 5, 218–237.

Chua, J.H, Chirsman, J.J., & Sharma P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-34.

Claver, E., Rienda L., & Pertusa, E.M. (2004). Un marco teórico para la continuidad de la Empresa Familiar desde un punto de vista estratégico. EsicMarket, mayo-agosto, 229-257.

Cooke, R., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Moderation of cognition–intention and cognition–behavior relations: A meta-analysis of properties of variables from the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 159-186.

De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J. H. and Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Ability and Willingness as Sufficiency Conditions for Family-Oriented Particularistic Behavior: Implications for Theory and Empirical Studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52: 344–364.

Downs, D. S. & Hausenblas, H. A. (2005). The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior applied to exercise: a meta-analytic update. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2, 76-97.

Drolet, A. L. & Morrison, D. G. (2001). Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research? Journal of Service Research, 3(3), 196–204.

Epstein, S. (1984). A procedural note on the measurement of broad disposition. Journal of Personality, 52, 318-25

Faccio and Lang. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65 (3), 365-395.

Fitzsimmons, J. R. & Douglas, E. J. (2011). Interaction between feasibility and desirability in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 431-440.

Fuetsch, E. & Frank, H. (2015) Die Familienverfassung: Strukturierung der Beziehungzwischen Familie und Unternehmen. In M. Lueger & H. Frank (Hrsg) ZukunftssicherungfürFamilienunternehmen. Good Practice Fallanalysenzur Family Governance. Facultas, Wien, 93–115

García-Álvarez, E. & López-Sintas, J. (2001). A Taxonomy of Founders Based on Values: The Root of Family Business Heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 14(3), 209–230.

Gist, M. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12 (3), 472-485.

Goethner, M., Obschonka, M., Silvereisen, R. K., & Cantner, U. (2012). Scientists' transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 628-641.

Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. & Biddle, S. J. H. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 3-32.

Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. & Biddle, S. J. H. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 3-32.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review. 26 (2), 106-121.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. & Mena, J. A. (2012b). An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414-33.

Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Henseler, J. & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580.

Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intention. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21 (1), 47-57.

Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D. & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5/6), 411-432.

Krueger, N.F. & Brazeal, D. (1994). Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18 (3), 91-104.

Krueger, N. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5-21.

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J. S., Brenner, B. R., Lynos, H. & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choose behavior in engineering majors. Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 458-465.

Liñán, F. (2004). Intention based models of entrepreneurship education. Piccolla Impresa/Small Business, 3, 11-35.

Liñán, F. & Chen, Y. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 593-617.

McEachan, R. R., Conner, M., Taylor, N. & Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with this Theory of Planned Behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review.

Melin, L. & M. Nordqvist. (2007). The Reflexive Dynamics of Institutionalization: The Case of the Family Business. Strategic Organization 5(3), 321–333.

Mitchell, R., Busenitz, L., Bird, B., Gaglio, C., McMullen, J. et al. (2007). The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 1-27.

Moriano, J. A., Topa, G., Molero, F., Entenza, A. M. & Lévy-Mangin, J.-P. (2012). Autoeficacia para el liderazgo emprendedor. Adaptación y validación de la escala CESE en España. Anales de Psicología, 28(1), 171-179.

Neubauer, F. & Lank, A. G. (1998). The family business: Its governance for sustainability. London: Macmillan Press.

Notani, A. S. (1998). Moderators of perceived behavioral control’s predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 247-271.

Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22(3), 218-233.

Robbins, S. & Judge, T. (2011). Organizational behavior. (14th) New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Rodríguez et al. (2007). El protocolo un juego de promesas y una cascada de contratos. Volume 8 of Cátedra PRASA. University of Córdoba Press.

Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H. & Dino, R. N. (2003b). Toward a Theory of Agency and Altruism in Family Firms, Journal of Business Venturing 18(4), 473–490.

Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N. & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence. Organization Science 12(2), 99– 116.

Schwenk, G. & Möser, G. (2009). Intention and behavior: A Bayesian meta-analysis with focus on the Ajzen–Fishbein model in the field of environmental behavior. Quality & Quantity, 43(5), 743-755.

Shapero, A. & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. Kent, D. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, 72-90. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Sharma, P. & Nordqvist, M. (2008). A Classification Scheme for Family Firms: From Family Values to Effective Governance to Firm Performance. In J. Tapies and J. L. Ward. (Eds.). Family Values and Value Creation: How Do Family-Owned Businesses Foster Enduring Values, 71-101. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Zahra. (2005). Entrepreneurial Risk taking in family business. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23-40.

Zellweger, T. & Kammerlander, N. (2015). Family, wealth and governance. An agency Account. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practic

Downloads

Published

2019-03-01

How to Cite

Rodríguez-Zapatero, M.-I., Pérez-Naranjo, L., Rodríguez-Jiménez, M., & Ramírez-Faz, I. (2019). Using PLS-SEM to Model Family Business Behavior When Addressing the Protocol. European Journal of Family Business, 8(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v8i2.5567

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2018)

Section

Research paper (SI)

License

Copyright generates two different rights: moral rights and patrimonial rights that EJFB recognizes and respects. Moral rights are those relating to the recognition of the authorship. They are rights of a personal nature that are perpetual, inalienable, unseizable and imprescriptible as consequence of the indivisible union of the author and his/her work. Patrimonial rights are those that can be derived from the reproduction, distribution, adaptation or communication of the work, among others.

Authors who publish in EJFB retain the copyright of their work and grant the right of its first publication to the journal in open access. EJFB is authorized to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or communicate the work under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License. This means that you are free to share and adapt this work under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to its author(s), which implie the right to be reconognized and cited correctly.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC