Inversión medioambiental y resultado financiero en las empresas familiares españolas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v4i1.5039Keywords:
Environmental Investment Financial performance Ownership structureAbstract
Ante la falta de consenso sobre la relación entre los resultados medioambientales y los resultados económicos de las empresas, y las aportaciones de diferentes autores que explican esta controversia por la existencia de ciertos condicionantes, el presente trabajo pretende analizar el posible efecto moderador de la forma de gobierno de la empresa en esta relación. Los resultados del análisis de regresión de una muestra de 1916 empresas del sector manufacturero español indican que, en efecto, la situación win-win en la que inversión medioambiental implica una mejora de los resultados medioambientales y económicos no puede darse por garantizada y, además, el impacto de la inversión medioambiental en los resultados financieros es mayor en el caso de las empresas pequeñas de tipo familiar.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Amores-Salvadó, J., Navas-López, J.E., Martín-de- Castro, G. y Delgado-Verde, M. (2012). El Paso del Control a la Prevención: ¿Importan los Estándares
Medioambientales? Universia Business Review, 34, 68- 81.
Aragón Correa, J.A. y Sharma, S. (2003). A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-88.
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez Mejía, L. y Larraza, M. (2009). Governance and Environmental Performance in Family Controlled Public Corporations. Frontiers of Entrepreneurs Research, 29(14), Article 2.
Bingham, J., Gibb Dyer, W., Smith, I. y Adams, G. (2011). A Stakeholder Identity Orientation Approach to Corporate Social Performance in Family Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 565-585.
Bosworth, W. y Clemens, B. (2011). Does It Pay to Be Environmentally Responsible?. Toxic Releases and Financial Performance. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7(2), 115-121.
Brio, J.A. y Junquera, B. (2004). Competitividad y Situación Medioambiental de los Centros Productivos Certificados en España. Universia Business Review, 4, p. 64-77.
Clemens, B. (2006). Economic Incentives and Small Firms: Does it Pay to be Green? Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 492-500.
Cañón de Francia, J. y Garcés Ayerbe, C. (2009). ISO 14001 Environmental Certification: A sign valued by the market? Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 245-262.
Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of Best Practices of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 663-680.
Clemens, B. y Bakstran, L. (2010). A Framework of Theoretical Lenses and Strategic Purposes to Describe Relationships among Firm Environmental Strategy, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance. Management Research Review, 33(4), 393-405.
Corona, J y Téllez Roca, J (2011). El Protocolo Familiar en Empresa Familiar: Aspectos Jurídicos y Económicos. Barcelona, España: Ed. Deusto, 75.
Craig, J. y Dibrell, C. (2006). The Natural Environment, Innovation and Firm Performance: A Comparative Study. Family Business Review, XIX(4), 275-288.
Darnall, N., Henriques, I. y Sadorsky, P. (2007). Do Environmental Systems Improve Business Performance in an International Setting? Journal of International Management, 14(4), 364-376.
Filbeck, G. y Gorman, R.F. (2004). The Relationship between the Environmental and Financial Performance of Public Utilities. Environmental and Resource Economics, 29, 137-157.
Gallego, I. (2012). La Empresa Familiar. Su Concepto y Delimitación Jurídica. Cuadernos de Reflexión de la Cátedra Prasa de la Empresa Familiar. Marzo 2012.
González Benito, J. y González Benito, O. (2005a). Environmental Proactivity and Business Performance: An Empirical Analysis. OMEGA The International Journal of Management Science, 33(1), 1-15.
González Benito, J. y González Benito, O. (2005b). Perfiles de Proactividad Medioambiental: Evidencia en Empresas Industriales Españolas. Universia Business Review, 5, 92-101.
Griffin, J.J. y Mahon, J.F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36, 5-31.
Guenster, N., Derwall, J., Bauer, R. y Koedijk, K. (2006). The Economic Value of Corporate Eco- Efficiency. European Financial Management, 17(4), 679- 704.
Hart, S.L. y Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it Pay to be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30-37.
Hart, S.L. (1995). A Natural Resourced-Based View of the Firm. Academic of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
Huang, Y., Ding, H. y Kao, M. (2009). Salient Stakeholder Voices Family Business And Green Innovation Adoption. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(3), 309-326.
Judge, W.Q. y Douglas. T.J. (1998). Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Isues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 241-62.
King, A. y Lenox, M. (2001). Does it Really Pay to be Green? An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 105-116.
King, A. y Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction. Management Science, 48, 289-299.
Klassen, R. y Whybark, D. (1999). The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599-615.
Konar, S. y Cohen, M.A. (2001). Does the Market V alue Environmental Performance. Review Economics and Statistics, 83, 281–289.
Lanoie, P., Laurent Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N. y Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 20(3), 803-842.
?Margolis, J.D. y Walsh, J.P. (2001). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Admnistrative Science Quarterly 48, 268–305.
Nakamura, E. (2011). Does Environmental Investment Really Contribute to Firm Performance?: An empirical Analysis Using Japanese Firms. Eurasian Business Review, 1(2), 91-111.
Porter, M. y Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and Competitive. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
Porter, M. (1991). America’s Green Strategy. Scientific American, 4, 68-168.
Russo, M. V. y Fouts, P. A. (1997). A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
Sharma, P. y Sharma, S. (2011). Drivers of Proactive Environmental Strategy in Family Firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 309-334.
Sharma, S. y Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729-753.
Telle, K. (2006). It Pays to be Green: A Premature Conclusion? Environmental and Resource Economics, 35, 195-220.
Uhlaner, L.M., Van Goor-Balk, H. y Masurel, E. (2004). Family Business and Corporate Social Responsibility in a Sample of Dutch Firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(2), 186- 194.
Wagner, M. (2010). Corporate Social Performance and Innovation with High Social Benefits: a Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 581-594.
Walls, J.L., Phan, P. y Berrone, P. (2008). An Assessment of the Construct Validity of Environmental Strategy Measures. Ross School of Business Working Paper Series, núm. 1105.
Xepapadeas A. y Zeeuw A. (1999). Environmental Policy and Competitiveness: The Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37, 165-182.
Ziegler, A., Schröder, M. y Rennings, K. (2007). The Effect of Environmental and Social Performance on the Stock Performance of European Corporations. Environmental Resource and Economics, 37, 661-680
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright generates two different rights: moral rights and patrimonial rights that EJFB recognizes and respects. Moral rights are those relating to the recognition of the authorship. They are rights of a personal nature that are perpetual, inalienable, unseizable and imprescriptible as consequence of the indivisible union of the author and his/her work. Patrimonial rights are those that can be derived from the reproduction, distribution, adaptation or communication of the work, among others.
Authors who publish in EJFB retain the copyright of their work and grant the right of its first publication to the journal in open access. EJFB is authorized to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or communicate the work under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License. This means that you are free to share and adapt this work under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to its author(s), which implie the right to be reconognized and cited correctly.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
.png){kind=logo}
27.png)
