Filantropía y Responsabilidad Social Corporativa en Familias Empresarias: Prácticas, Gobernanza y Dinámicas Intergeneracionales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.15.2.2025.19623Palabras clave:
Familia empresaria, Filantropía, Responsabilidad social corporativa, Gobernanza, Valores intergeneracionalesResumen
Este estudio explora cómo las familias empresarias llevan a cabo e interrelacionan la filantropía y la responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC), yendo más allá de las perspectivas centradas en la empresa para enfocarse en la familia como un actor cívico y emprendedor. A partir de un estudio de casos múltiples de familias empresarias canadienses, identificamos la filantropía y la RSC como prácticas complementarias moldeadas por la identidad, la gobernanza y los valores intergeneracionales. Los hallazgos revelan una transición de un compromiso basado en la reciprocidad hacia una innovación social de carácter emprendedor, apoyada por mecanismos de gobernanza que incluyen la toma de decisiones, el seguimiento, las alianzas y la narración de historias. La filantropía ofrece flexibilidad para abordar necesidades urgentes, mientras que la RSC incorpora objetivos éticos y sostenibles en las operaciones empresariales. En conjunto, estas prácticas fomentan el valor social y la alineación estratégica. El estudio contribuye a la teoría al tender puentes entre la riqueza socioemocional y la gobernanza relacional, al realizar cinco proposiciones para investigaciones futuras.
Descargas
Publicación Facts
Perfil de revisores N/D
Información adicional autores
Indexado: {$indexList}
-
Indexado en
- Sociedad Académica/Grupo
- N/D
- Editora:
- Uma Editorial, University of Malaga (Spain)
Citas
Aparicio, G. and Iturralde, T. (2023). New research trends in sustainability in family businesses: a bibliometric literature review. European Journal of Family Business, 13(1), 36-55. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v13i1.16744
Amonarriz, C. A., Suárez, M. K. C., & Landart, C. I. (2024). Leadership succession and transgenerational entrepreneurship in family firms: An evolutionary perspective of familiness. European Journal of Family Business, 14(1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.14.1.2024.18799
Aronoff, C. E., & Ward, J. L. (2011). Organizing the Family. In Family Business Governance: Maximizing Family and Business Potential (pp. 29-47). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230116016_4
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
Bizzi, L., & Langley, A. (2012). Studying processes in and around networks. Industrial marketing management, 41(2), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.007
Cadieux, L. (2007). Succession in small and medium-sized-businesses: toward a typology of predecessor roles during and after instatement of the successor. Family Business Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00089.x
Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Cassia, L. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in family versus non-family enterprises: an exploratory study. In Social entrepreneurship: Leveraging economic, political, and cultural dimensions (pp. 113-154). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01396-1_6
Campopiano, G., & De Massis, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting: a content analysis in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 511‑534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2174-z
Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Chirico, F. (2014). Firm philanthropy in small-and medium-sized family firms: The effects of family involvement in ownership and management. Family Business Review, 27(3), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514538450
Campopiano, G., Rinaldi, F. R., Sciascia, S., & De Massis, A. (2019). Family and non-family women on the board of directors: effects on corporate citizenship behavior in family-controlled fashion firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.319
Castejón, J.M. & López, B. A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in family SMEs: a comparative study. European Journal of Family Business, 6(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2016.05.002
Chalmeta, R., & Viinikka, H. (2017). Corporate philanthropy communication on donor websites. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 15(01), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-03-2016-0008
Collin, S. O. Y., & Ahlberg, J. (2012). Blood in the boardroom: family relationships influencing the functions of the board. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(4), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.11.001
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
Cruz, C., Justo, R., & Roche, J. (2021). Engaging in a new field: business owning families’ differential approach to impact investing. European Journal of Family Business, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i1
Cruz, C., Larraza–Kintana, M., Garcés–Galdeano, L., & Berrone, P. (2014). Are family firms really more socially responsible? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1295-1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12125
de Groot, M., Mihalache, O., & Elfring, T. (2022). Enhancing enterprise family social capital through family governance: an identity perspective. Family Business Review, 35(3), 306-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865221105334
Denzin, N.K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago : Aldine.
Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Deschamps, B., Cisneros, L., & Barès, F. (2014). PME familiales québécoises : Impact des parties prenantes externes à la famille dans le co-sucessions en fratrie. Management International, 18(4), 282‑308. https://doi.org/10.7202/1026035ar
Díaz-Moriana, V., Clinton, E., Faherty, C., & O’Gorman, C. (2025). Resilience behaviors and temporal orientation in family firms. Family Business Review, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865251341696
Dung, L. T., & Giang, H. T. T. (2022). The effect of international intrapreneurship on firm export performance with driving force of organizational factors. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(11), 2185-2204.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2021-0018
Feliu, N., & Botero, I. C. (2016). Philanthropy in family enterprises: a review of literature. Family Business Review, 29(1), 121‑141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515610962
Fitzgerald, M. A., Haynes, G. W., Schrank, H. L., & Danes, S. M. (2010). Socially responsible processes of small family business owners: Exploratory evidence from the national family business survey. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(4), 524-551.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00307.x
Fonseca, A. P., & Carnicelli, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in a hospitality family business. Sustainability, 13(13), 7091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137091
Fraser, M. (1987). Quebec Inc. Key Porter Books.
Gersick, K.E, Davis, J.A., Hampton, M.M., Lansberg, I., (1997). Generation to generation: life cycles of the family business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research : Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15‑31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Habbershon, T. G., & Pistrui, J. (2002). Enterprising families domain: family-influenced ownership grous in pursuit of transgenerational wealth. Family Business Review, 15(3), 223‑237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00223.x
Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMilan, I. C. (2003). A unified system perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 452‑465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3
Hamilton, E. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning in family business: a situated learning perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111106406
Harvey, C., Gordon, J., & Maclean, M. (2021). The ethics of entrepreneurial philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 33‑49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04468-7
Häußler, S., Ulrich, P. (2024).Exploring strategic corporate sustainability management in family businesses: A systematic literature review. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00776-8
Hellsten, S., & Mallin, C. (2006). Are « ethical » or « socially responsible » investments socially responsible? Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 393‑406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0001-x
Hernández Linares, R. & Arias-Abelaira, T. (2022). Adapt or perish! A systematic review of the literature on strategic renewal and the family firm. European Journal of Family Business, 12(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v12i2.14718
Ibáñez, S., Miranda, M., & Ariza, L. (2022). The influence of the business name on the economic performance of family firms: an analysis according to the generational stage. European Journal of Family Business, 12(2), 205-219.
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v12i2.14071
Izzo, M. F., & Ciaburri, M. (2018). Why do they do that? Motives and dimensions of family firms’ CSR engagement. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(3), 633-650. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2017-0148
Jamali, D., Karam, C., Yin, J., & Soundararajan, V. (2017). CSR logics in developing countries: Translation, adaptation and stalled development. Journal of World Business, 52(3), 343-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.02.001
Janesick, V. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209–219). Sage Publications, Inc.
Jansson, A., & Larsson‐Olaison, U. (2015). I heard it through the grapevine: market control of controlling family shareholders. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(6), 504-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12124
Jayakumar, T. (2016). From philanthropy to strategic corporate sustainability: A case study in India. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(6), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-10-2015-0110
Jiang, S., & Min, Y. (2023). The ability and willingness of family firms to bribe: A socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(1), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/
Kaimal, A., & Uzma, S. H. (2024). Corporate social responsibility expenditure and financial performance: the moderating role of family ownership. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0128
Kayid, W. A., Jin, Z., Priporas, C. V., & Ramakrishnan, S. (2022). Defining family business efficacy: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 141, 713-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.081
Kelley D., Gartner W. B., & Allen M. (2020). Global entrepreneurship monitor family business report. Babson College Press.
Kim, S., & Austin, L. (2020). Effects of CSR initiatives on company perceptions among Millennial and Gen Z consumers. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(2), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0077
Kuttner, M., Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., & Mitter, C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in Austrian family firms: Socioemotional wealth and stewardship insights from a qualitative approach. Journal of Family Business Management, 11(2), 238-253.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-04-2019-0028
Lamb, N. H., & Butler, F. C. (2018). The influence of family firms and institutional owners on corporate social responsibility performance. Business & Society, 57(7), 1374-1406.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316648443
Leana, C. R., & Van Buren, H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538‑555. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.2202136
Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1(3), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.248
Locke, K. (1996). Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(3), 239-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/105649269653008
Lorenzo-Molo, C. F., & Udani, Z. A. S. (2013). Bringing back the essence of the “S” and “R” to CSR: understanding the limitations of the merchant trade and the white man’s burden. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 123‑136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1513-1
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Gordon, J. (2013). Social innovation, social entrepreneurship and the practice of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 31(7), 747‑763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612443376
Marques, P., Presas, P., & Simon, A. (2014). The heterogeneity of family firms in CSR engagement: The role of values. Family Business Review, 27(3), 206-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514539004
Mariani, M. M., Al-Sultan, K., & De Massis, A. (2023). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1192-1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955122
Mauss, M. (1923). Essai sur le don : Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. l’Année Sociologique (1896/1987-1924/1925), 1, 30‑186. https://doi.org/10.1522/cla.mam.ess3
Mejía‐Morelos, J., Grima, F., & Trepo, G. (2013). Change and stability interaction processes in SMEs: a comparative case study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(2), 370-422. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811311328407
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis : An expanded sourcebook, Sage Publications.
Miroshnychenko, I., De Massis, A., Miller, D., & Barontini, R. (2021). Family business growth around the world. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45 (4), 682-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720913028
Musson, G. (1998). Life histories. In Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research (in G. Symon&C. Cassel (Eds.), p. 10‑27). Sage.
Mustakallio, M., Autio, E., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Relational and contractual governance in family firms: effects on strategic decision making. Family Business Review, 15(3), 205‑222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00205.x
Nason, R., Mazzelli, A., & Carney, M. (2019). The ties that unbind: socialization and business-owning family reference point shift. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 846-870. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0289
Pan, Y., Weng, R., Xu, N., & Chan, K. C. (2018). The role of corporate philanthropy in family firm succession : A social outreach perspective. Journal of Banking and Finance, 88, 423‑441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.01.011
Patton, E. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE.
Patton, E., & Appelbaum, S. H. (2003). The case for case studies in management research. Management Research News, 26(5), 60‑72. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170310783484 Pereira-Otero, B. and Gallo, M. Á. (2023). Pruning the Family Tree: When Is it Necessary? European Journal of Family Business, 13(2), 255-260.
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.13.2.2023.16388
Pratono, A. H., & Han, L. (2022). From family business orientation to organisational citizenship behaviour: prosocial behaviour in family business performance. Journal of Family Business Management, 12(4), 923-937. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-02-2021-0014
Purwatiningsih, P.A., Purnamasari, S., Setyawati, H., Indriani, A., Prawitasari, D., & Fitria, S. (2024). Insights into the evolution of philanthropy: a systematic literature review. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 1994-2002. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4351
PwC (2021). From trust to impact: why family businesses need to act now to ensure their legacy tomorrow. https://www.pwc.com/ca/en/private-company/family-business-survey-canadian-insights-2021.html
Rahman, M. J., & Zheng, X. (2023). Whether family ownership affects the relationship between CSR and EM: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 13(2), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-03-2022-0030
Rey-Garcia, M., Layton, M. D., & Martin-Cavanna, J. (2020). Corporate Foundations in Latin America. In L. Roza, S. Bethmann, L. Meijs, & G. von Schnurbein (Eds.), Handbook on Corporate Foundations. Nonprofit and civic society studies. (p. 167‑190). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25759-0_9
Rivo-López, E., Villanueva-Villar, M., Michinel-Álvarez, M., & Reyes-Santías, F. (2021).
Corporate social responsibility and family business in the time of COVID-19: changing strategy? Sustainability, 13(4), 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042041
Sánchez, B., Rodríguez, M., & Pérez, L. M. (2025). How does socioemotional wealth in business families contribute to implementing protocols? The moderating effect of the generational stage. European Journal of Family Business. 15(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.15.2.2025.20264
Schillaci, C. E., Romano, M., & Nicotra, M. (2013). Family business foundations : theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(22). https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-2-22
Schulze, M., & Bövers, J. (2022). Family business resilience: the importance of owner-manager’s relational resilience in crisis response strategies. European Journal of Family Business, 12(2), 100-123. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v12i2.14657
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business, J.Wiley. New York.
Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies : current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1‑36. 1
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x
Shaw, E., Gordon, J., Harvey, C., & Maclean, M. (2013). Exploring contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 31(5), 580‑599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611429164
Spence, L. J. (2016). Small business social responsibility: expanding core CSR theory. Business & Society, 55(1), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650314523256
Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research (p. 443‑466). SAGE Publications.
Stake, R. (2006). Muiltiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press.
Stock, C., Pütz, L., Schell, S., & Werner, A. (2024). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: status and future directions of a research field. Journal of Business Ethics, 190, 199–259 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05382-4
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research : Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
Suárez, M., Rivo-López, E., & Peñas, S. (2020). Strategic and organizational change. European Journal of Family Business, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v10i1.9828
Suess-Reyes, J., & Fuetsch, E. (2016). The future of family farming: a literature review on innovative, sustainable and succession-oriented strategies. Journal of rural studies, 47, 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.008
Terrón-Ibáñez, S., Gómez-Miranda, M. E., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2022). The influence of the business name on the economic performance of family firms: an analysis according to the generational stage. European Journal of Family Business, 12(2), 205-219.
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v12i2.14071
Van Gils, A., Dibrell, C., Neubaum, D. O., & Craig, J. B. (2014). Social issues in the family enterprise. Family Business Review, 27(3), 193‑205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514542398
Williams, M. (2000). Interpretivism and Generalisation. Sociology, 34(2), 209‑224.
Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: design and methods. SAGE Publications.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Rosane Dal Magro, Luis Cisneros

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los derechos de autoría son de dos tipos: morales y patrimoniales, los cuales EJFB reconoce y respeta. Los derechos morales son los relacionados con el reconocimiento de autoría. Son prerrogativas perpetuas, irrenunciables, intransferibles, inalienables, inembargables e imprescriptibles como consecuencia del vínculo indivisible del autor/a y su obra. Los derechos patrimoniales son aquellos que se derivan de la reproducción, distribución, adaptación o comunicación pública de la obra, entre otros. Estos derechos patrimoniales son cedidos por EJFB a la Universidad de Málaga en acceso abierto.
Los autores y autoras que publican en EJFB reconocen que la revista se publica en completo acceso abierto y que está autorizada para reproducir, distribuir, difundir o comunicar el trabajo bajo una Licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Esto significa que usted es libre de compartir y adaptar este material bajo las condiciones siguientes:
- Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, lo que implica el derecho de los autores y autoras a ser reconocidos y citados correctamente.
- No Comercial — No puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales.
- Compartir Igual — Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.


1.png)


26.png)