International Partnership Failures in the Context of Family Small and Medium Enterprises Internationalisation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.vi.15154Keywords:
Failures, Family SMEs, International partnerships, Internationalisation, Family goals, SEWAbstract
This study aims to address the question of why the efforts of family Small and Medium Enterprises (family SMEs) to develop international partnerships fail. In particular, it draws on the network theory of internationalisation and SEW perspective and explores how family managers’ interpretation of the behaviour of potential international partners can lead to the failure of the attempt to develop an international partnership in the context of family SMEs internationalisation. To do so, it conducts a multiple case study of four internationalised Greek family SMEs in the food and beverages sector. The findings suggest that family managers set strict criteria, regarding their expectations about international partners’ behaviour when evaluating the potential international partners, which emerge from family managers’ effort to fulfil family goals (e.g., the preservation of family harmony and family reputation), and reveal that the family managers’ priority on the fulfilment of family goals can hinder the international partnership development process. These findings build upon the limited, yet important, family SMEs literature on international partnership failures and enrich previous networking theories about family SMEs’ internationalisation.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Andersen, O., & Buvik, A. (2002). Firms’ internationalization and alternative approaches to the international customer/market selection. International Business Review, 11(3), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00064-6
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400103
Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., & Mari, I. (2019). A missing link in family firms’ internationalization research: family structures. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(5), 809-825. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00213-z
Barros, I., Hernangómez, J., & Martin-Cruz, N. (2017). Familiness and socioemotional wealth in Spanish family firms: an empirical examination. European Journal of Family Business, 7(1-2), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.06.004
Baumard, P., & Starbuck, W. H. (2005). Learning from failures: why it may not happen. Long Range Planning, 38(3), 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.03.004
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
Boers, B. (2016). Go East! How family businesses choose markets and entry modes when internationalising. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 8(4), 333-354. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGSB.2016.081421
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Partnership as a social network mediator for resolving global conflict: the Case of the World Commission on Dams. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(11), 1281-1310. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120013348
Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Wilkinson, T. J. (1995). Strategic alliances: Choose your partners. Long Range planning, 28(3), 2-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(95)00008-7
Cesinger, B., Hughes, M., Mensching, H., Bouncken, R., Fredrich, V., & Kraus, S. (2016). A socioemotional wealth perspective on how collaboration intensity, trust, and international market knowledge affect family firms’ multinationality. Journal of World Business, 51(4), 586-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.02.004
Child, J., & Hsieh, L. H. (2014). Decision mode, information and network attachment in the internationalization of SMEs: a configurational and contingency analysis. Journal of world Business, 49(4), 598-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.12.012
Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: a five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281-1303. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28165855
Craig?Lees, M. (2001). Sense making: Trojan horse? Pandora's box?. Psychology & Marketing, 18(5), 513-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1019
De Farias, S. A., Nataraajan, R., & Kovacs, E. P. (2009). Global business partnering among family-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 62(6), 667-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.02.003
De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Majocchi, A., & Piscitello, L. (2018). Family firms in the global economy: toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes, and outcomes. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1199
Debellis, F., Rondi, E., Plakoyiannaki, E., & De Massis, A. (2021). Riding the waves of family firm internationalization: a systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 56(1), 101144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101144
Dimitratos, P., Plakoyiannaki, E., Pitsoulaki, A., & Tüselmann, H. J. (2010). The global smaller firm in international entrepreneurship. International Business Review, 19(6), 589-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.03.005
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
Duisters, D., Duysters, G., & De Man, A. P. (2011). The partner selection process: steps, effectiveness, governance. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances, 2(1/2), 7-25.
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298705100202
Dyer Jr, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613-619. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279492
Eberhard, M., & Craig, J. (2013). The evolving role of organisational and personal networks in international market venturing. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 385-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.022
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: a realist approach. Sage.
Family Business Survey (2020). https://www.pwc.com/gr/en/publications/PwC_FamilyBusinessSurvey2020_Greece.pdf (Accessed on 7 March 2021).
Fletcher, D., De Massis, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2016). Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: a review and future research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001
Fletcher, M., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2011). Case selection in international business: key issues and common misconceptions. In R. Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Rethinking the case study in international business and management research (pp. 171-191). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857933461.00019
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653-707. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.1
Graves, C., & Thomas, J. (2008). Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: an examination of family influence. Family Business Review, 21(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00119
Hennart, J. F., Majocchi, A., & Forlani, E. (2019). The myth of the stay-at-home family firm: how family-managed SMEs can overcome their internationalization limitations. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(5), 758-782. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0091-y
Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L.-G. (1988). Internationalization in industrial systems – a network approach. In N. Hood & J.-E. Vahlne (Eds.), Strategies in global competition (pp. 303–321). New York: Croom Helm.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2006). Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: a note on the Uppsala internationalization process model. Management International Review, 46(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-006-0043-4
Johanson, J. J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411-1431. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386-408. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687
Kampouri, K., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2021). Entry nodes in foreign market entry and post-entry operations of family-managed firms. In T. Leppäaho, & S. Jack (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of family firm internationalization (pp. 237-264). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66737-5_8
Kampouri, K., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Leppäaho, T. (2017). Family business internationalisation and networks: emerging pathways. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2015-0066
Kao, M. S., & Kuo, A. (2017). The effect of uncertainty on FDI entry mode decisions: the influence of family ownership and involvement in the board of directors. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(4), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.09.003
Kao, M. S., Kuo, A., & Chang, Y. C. (2013). How family control influences FDI entry mode choice. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(4), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2013.23
Karipidis, P., Chrysochou, P., & Karypidou, I. (2020). The importance of relationship characteristics in the export performance of food firms. British Food Journal, 122(4), 1305-1320. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2019-0376
Kauser, S., & Shaw, V. (2004). The influence of behavioural and organisational characteristics on the success of international strategic alliances. International Marketing Review, 21(1), 17-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330410522934
Kontinen, T., & Ojala, A. (2011). Network ties in the international opportunity recognition of family SMEs. International Business Review, 20(4), 440-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.08.002
Leppäaho, T., Jack, S. L., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2021). Network mechanisms in the entry and post?entry phases of internationalization: evidence from Finnish family firms. British Journal of Management, 33(4), 1991-2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12564.
Leppäaho, T., & Metsola, J. (2019). Family firm internationalisation: a network perspective. Springer Nature.
Leppäaho, T., & Metsola, J. (2020). Conclusions: implications of family firm internationalisation from a network perspective. In family firm internationalisation (pp. 121-135). Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28520-3_4
Mariotti, S., Marzano, R., & Piscitello, L. (2021). The role of family firms’ generational heterogeneity in the entry mode choice in foreign markets. Journal of Business Research, 132, 800-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.064
Martínez-Romero, M. J., & Rojo-Ramírez, A. A. (2016). SEW: looking for a definition and controversial issues. European Journal of Family Business, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2015.09.001
Matthyssens, P., & Pauwels, P. (2000). Uncovering international market?exit processes: a comparative case study. Psychology & Marketing, 17(8), 697-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200008)17:8<697::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-T
Mensching, H., Calabrò, A., Eggers, F., & Kraus, S. (2016). Internationalisation of family and non-family firms: a conjoint experiment among CEOs. European Journal of International Management, 10(5), 581-604. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2016.078795
Meschi, P. X., & Wassmer, U. (2013). The effect of foreign partner network embeddedness on international joint venture failure: evidence from European firms’ investments in emerging economies. International Business Review, 22(4), 713-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.11.003
Metsola, J. (2021). Coexistence of economic and noneconomic goals in building foreign partner relationships: evidence from small Finnish family firms. In T. Leppäaho, & S. Jack (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of family firm internationalization (pp. 289-326). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66737-5_10
Metsola, J., & Kuivalainen, O. (2021). International business decision-making in family small- and medium-sized enterprises. European Journal of Family Business, 11(2), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.24310/EJFBEJFB.V11I2.13842
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150205
Moreno-Menéndez, A. M., & Castiglioni, M. (2021). The influence of socio-emotional wealth on the speed of the export development process in family and non-family firms. European Journal of Family Business, 11(2), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i2.10782
Nummela, N., Saarenketo, S., & Loane, S. (2016). The dynamics of failure in international new ventures: A case study of Finnish and Irish software companies. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614539363
Oerlemans, L. A. G., Gössling, T., & Jansen, R. J. G. (2007). Tie failure: A literature review. In T. Gossling, L. Oerlemans, & R. Jansen (Eds.), Inside Networks (pp. 195-221). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Parameswar, N., Dhir, S., Khoa, T. T., Galati, A., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2021). Dynamics of the termination of global alliances: probing the past, analyzing the present and defining the frontiers for future research. International Marketing Review, 39(5), 1093-1121. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2021-0046
Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: a conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.37.10118
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137
Pongelli, C., Caroli, M. G., & Cucculelli, M. (2016). Family business going abroad: the effect of family ownership on foreign market entry mode decisions. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 787-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9763-4
Pukall, T. J., & Calabrò, A. (2014). The internationalization of family firms: a critical review and integrative model. Family Business Review, 27(2), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513491423
Rienda, L., & Andreu, R. (2021). The role of family firms’ heterogeneity on the internationalisation and performance relationship. European Journal of Family Business, 11(2), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i2.10591
Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sandberg, S. (2013). Emerging market entry node pattern and experiential knowledge of small and medium-sized enterprises. International Marketing Review, 30(2), 106–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331311314547
Sandberg, S. (2014). Experiential knowledge antecedents of the SME network node configuration in emerging market business networks. International Business Review, 23(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.001
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211
Scholes, L., Mustafa, M., & Chen, S. (2016). Internationalization of small family firms: The influence of family from a socioemotional wealth perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 58(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21729
Sestu, M. C., Majocchi, A., & D’Angelo, A. (2018). Entry mode strategies: are SMEs any different?. In N., Dominguez, & U. Mayrhofer (Eds.), Key success factors of SME internationalisation: a cross-country perspective (pp. 63-68). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-066X20180000034004
Shah, R. H., & Swaminathan, V. (2008). Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: the moderating role of alliance context. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5), 471-494. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.656
Sharma, A., Kumar, V., Yan, J., Borah, S. B., & Adhikary, A. (2019). Understanding the structural characteristics of a firm’s whole buyer–supplier network and its impact on international business performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(3), 365-392. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00215-x
Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1086/209413
Stieg, P., Cesinger, B., Apfelthaler, G., Kraus, S., & Cheng, C. F. (2018). Antecedents of successful internationalization in family and non-family firms: how knowledge resources and collaboration intensity shape international performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 28(1), 14-27.
Tsang, E. W. (2020). Family firms and internationalization: an organizational learning perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), 205-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9590-z
Welch, C. (2000). The archaeology of business networks: the use of archival records in case study research. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 8(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2000.10815560
Welch, C. & Welch, L. S. (2009). Re-internationalization: exploration and conceptualisation. International Business Review, 18(6), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.07.003
Welch, C., Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E., Piekkari, R., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2022). Reconciling theory and context: how the case study can set a new agenda for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(1), 4-26. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00484-5
Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133-153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.192967
Wright, M., Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. P. (2014). Family enterprise and context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1247-1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12122
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zineldin, M., & Dodourova, M. (2005). Motivation, achievements and failure of strategic alliances. European Business Review, 17(5), 460-470. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340510620357
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright generates two different rights: moral rights and patrimonial rights that EJFB recognizes and respects. Moral rights are those relating to the recognition of the authorship. They are rights of a personal nature that are perpetual, inalienable, unseizable and imprescriptible as consequence of the indivisible union of the author and his/her work. Patrimonial rights are those that can be derived from the reproduction, distribution, adaptation or communication of the work, among others.
Authors who publish in EJFB retain the copyright of their work and grant the right of its first publication to the journal in open access. EJFB is authorized to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or communicate the work under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License. This means that you are free to share and adapt this work under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to its author(s), which implie the right to be reconognized and cited correctly.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
.png){kind=logo}
27.png)
