Utilitas rei publicae: the Libertas in the Agrícola of Tácito

Authors

  • Juan Tellería Sebastián

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/BAETICA.2007.v0i29.233

Abstract

Agricola constitutes a political speech in response to the ideas of a group partial to Nerva and Trajano and, from the moderatio, opposed to the Flavian dinasty. In this context, the libertas belongs to the Senate and consists of freedom of speech. The concordia is the foundation of the Roman superiority towards conquered peoples. Julio Agricola is an example, like Nerva is, of how to do politics under tyrants with the service to the Roman state as the principal target.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

ALONSO NÚÑEZ, J. M (1982), ‘Característica de De

Vita Iulii Agricolae de Tácito’, BSEAA XLVIII.

BROWN, I. C (1981), ‘Tacitus and a space for freedom’, H.T. XXXI 4.

CORNELIO TACITO (1980), Agricola, Germania, Diálogo de Oradores, Introducción, traducción y notas de J.M. Requejo. Madrid.

GÄRTNER, H (2000), “Politische Moral bei Sallust, Livius und Tacitus”, AantHung 40.

JOHNSON, C. N (1980), Libertas and Res Publica in Cicero and Tacitus, Columbia Univ., N.Y.

LEEMAN, A. D (1973), “Structure and meaning in the prologues of Tacitus”, Yale Classical Studies XXIII.

LIEBESCHUETZ, W (1966), “The theme of liberty in the

Agricola of Tacitus”, Classical Quaterly 60.

LÓPEZ FONSECA, A (1994), “Aproximación retórica al Agricola de Tácito”, VIII Congreso español de estudios clásicos, Madrid 1991, vol. 2.

MARTIN, R (1981), Tacitus, Londres.

MAZZARINO, S (1968), Il pensiero storico classico, vol. II.2, Bari.

MELLOR, R (1993), Tacitus, Routledge, N.Y.

OGILVIE, R.M. et alii (1714), ‘An interim report on Tacitus’ Agricola’, ANRW II, 33.3.

PARATORE, E (1962), Tacito, Roma.

PLINIO (1955), Panegírico de Trajano, Madrid, XXXVII.

SABLAYROLLES, R (1981), ‘Style et choix politique dans la Vie d’Agricola de Tacite’, B.A.G.B.

SAILOR, D (2004), “Becoming Tacitus: significance and inconsequentiality in the prologue of Agricola”, Classical Antiquity 23 (1).

STEINMETZ, P (1971), ‘Die literarische Form des Agricola des Tacitus’, en “Politik und literarische Kunst im Werk

des Tacitus”, A.V. XIV.

STEWART, JAMES J (2003), “Some connections between the speech of Calgacus and the « Laus Caesaris »”, AHB 17.

SYME, R (1958), Tacitus, Oxford.

TELLERÍA, J. C (2005), “Aproximación al concepto de libertad política en las Historiae de Tácito”, Baetica 27.

TELLERÍA, J. C (2006), “El significado del concepto libertas en los Annales de Tácito”, Baetica 28.

TURNER, A. J (1997), “Approaches to Tacitus’

Agricola”, Latomus, 56 (3).

Published

2015-05-28

How to Cite

Tellería Sebastián, J. (2015). Utilitas rei publicae: the Libertas in the Agrícola of Tácito. BAETICA. Estudios De Historia Moderna Y Contemporánea, (29), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.24310/BAETICA.2007.v0i29.233

Issue

Section

Histórico