The Rider Act Two Years Later: Lessons from a Particular Experience

Authors

  • Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero Royo Universidad de Sevilla Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/rejlss7202317604

Keywords:

digital platforms, riders, new forms of employment, social dialogue, ndustrial action

Abstract

Spain has been a pioneer in the regulation of platform work, and for many reasons its experience is interesting from an academic and public policy point of view. Not only for having a monographic law derived from social dialogue: it highlights the relevance of workers’ collective action in the 21st century as well, since it has been the riders’ collective that has managed to change their situation and to force a new regulation. The Rider Act has not been as effective as it was foreseen, though. Some relevant actors in the sector have stubbornly refused to comply with its main mandates, staying at their traditional business model based on self-employment of riders. At the same time, the impact on working and economic conditions has not been as positive as expected. In many cases their income has been reduced, and the social protection they have acceded to has been of low quality. This paper identifies the causes that have produced this phenomenon, which was not contemplated when the new regulation was drawn up.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero Royo, Universidad de Sevilla

Catedrático de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social

References

Baylos Grau, A., “La larga marcha hacia el trabajo formal: el caso de los riders y la ley 12/2021”, Cuadernos de relaciones laborales, Vol. 40, Nº 1, 2022, págs. 95-113.

Bogliacino F., Cirillo V., Codagnone C., Guarascio D., “Quantity and quality of work in the platform economy”, in Zimmermann K. F. (ed.), “Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics”, Berlin, Springer, pp.1-28, 2018.

Bogliacino F., Cirillo V., Codagnone C., Fana M., Lupiáñez-Villanueva F., Veltri G. a., “Shaping individual preferences for social protection: the case of platform workers”, LEM Working Papers Serie n.21, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, 2019.

Boston Consulting Group, “Economía Digital en España”, ADIGITAL, Madrid, 2022.

Cruz Villalón, J., “The debate around the adaptation or overcoming of subordination as a referential element of Labor Law in the face of new forms of work. A global debate from the Spanish perspective”, Labour & Law Issues, vol. 6, nº 2, 2020, (disponible en: https://labourlaw.unibo.it/article/view/12010).

Diez, F., “Las plataformas de reparto y la ley “rider” en España. Historia, seguimiento y análisis”, Observatorio de trabajo, algoritmos y sociedad. Madrid, 2023.

Digital Future Society, “Work on digital platforms in digital platforms in Spain: what do we know? A literature review”, Madrid, 2020.

ETUI, “Results from the second ETUI Internet and Platform Work Survey”, Bruselas, 2022.

Eurofound, “Employment and working conditions of selected types of platform work”, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018.

Foro De Humanismo Tecnológico ESADE, “Ley Rider, un año después”, ESADE, Barcelona, 2022.

Ginés And Fabrellas, A., “El derecho a conocer el algoritmo: una oportunidad perdida de la “Ley Rider”, IUS Labor 2/2021. Disponible en: https://raco.cat/index.php/IUSLabor/article/view/389840

Guarascio D. (a cura di), “Report sull’economia delle piattaforme digitali in Europa e in Italia”, Inapp Report n.7, Roma, Inapp, 2018.

Hernández Bejarano, M.; Rodríguez-Piñero Royo, M.; Y Todolí Signes, A., “Cambiando la forma de trabajar y de vivir: de las plataformas a la economía colaborativa real”, Tirant Lo Blanc, Valencia, 2020.

Martín González, J., “La emergencia de riesgos psicosociales y el trabajo de plataformas digitales”, Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo, INSST, Madrid, 2022.

Moreno Gené, J., “Presunción legal de laboralidad del trabajo en plataformas digitales de reparto ¿Y ahora qué?”, Revista de Estudios Jurídico Laborales y de Seguridad Social, nº 4, 2022.

Nunu M., Nausedaite R., Eljas-Taal K., Svatikova K., Porsch L. (2018), “Study to monitor the economic development of the collaborative economy at sector level in the 28 EU Member States”, Brussels, European Commission - Directorate General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs.

Ouishare, “El mercado laboral digital a debate. Plataformas, Trabajadores, Derechos y WorkerTech”, Fundación Cotec, Madrid, 2020.

Pastor, A.; Molina, O.; Godino, A.; & Romero, J., “Plataformas digitales: condiciones laborales y representación colectiva. Retos de futuro”, Institut d’Estudis del Treball, Barcelona, 2020.

Pérez Guerrero, M. l., & Rodríguez-Piñero Royo, M., “Social security for Spain’s platform workers: Self-employed or employee status?”, International Social Security Review, Volumen 74, no. 3-4, 2021, pags. 177-194.

Todolí, A. & Peiró, J. M., “El trabajo en plataformas digitales en la Comunidad Valenciana”, Valencia, 2021.

Urzi Brancati C., Pesole A., Fernández-Macías E. (2020), “New evidence on platform workers in Europe”. Results from the second COLLEEM survey, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.

Published

2023-09-20

How to Cite

Rodríguez-Piñero Royo, M. (2023). The Rider Act Two Years Later: Lessons from a Particular Experience. Journal of Labor and Social Security Legal Studies (REJLSS), (7), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.24310/rejlss7202317604

Issue

Section

Estudios doctrinales