Abuse in the relationship of interim statutory staff: irregular, but non-permanent

Comentario a la STJUE de 19 de marzo de 2020 (C-103/18 y C-429/18), asuntos Sánchez Ruiz y Fernández Álvarez

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/rejlss.vi1.10416

Abstract

The judgment reiterates doctrine on abuse by the Administrations of the recourse to contracts or temporary relationships to meet permanent needs. It denies that stabilization (contract or relationship as permanent employee or equivalent statute) can take place through the judicial channel, however it contains some interesting thesis. Among the most outstanding contributions, the following should be noted: the consideration of “successive” links in relation to the breach of the obligation to call the selective provision process; the affirmation that the employee could never suffer prejudice for having consented to the succession of temporary contracts or relationships; finally, the referral to national courts of the task of judging whether the compensation provided for the unfair dismissal is sufficient to prevent abuses in temporary employment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Juan José Fernández Domínguez

Catedrático de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social de la Universidad de León.

Published

2020-10-14

How to Cite

Fernández Domínguez, J. J. (2020). Abuse in the relationship of interim statutory staff: irregular, but non-permanent: Comentario a la STJUE de 19 de marzo de 2020 (C-103/18 y C-429/18), asuntos Sánchez Ruiz y Fernández Álvarez. Journal of Labor and Social Security Legal Studies (REJLSS), (1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.24310/rejlss.vi1.10416

Issue

Section

Estudios jurisprudenciales