Berrocal and the transhumanist aesthetic

A transhumanist overview of Berrocal's work

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Umatica.2019.v1i2.7880

Keywords:

transhumanism, Art, Robotics, Berrocal, Sculpture, Aesthetics

Abstract

Miguel Berrocal's work is always referred to and remembered as an example of "mathematical art", an adjective that makes sense because it is one of the artists who combines engineering and art in his sculptural work. For others, his works are reminiscent of the work of a jeweller or a watchmaker, a craftsman who has gone beyond the line that was drawn in the 18th century and has become an artist. However, there are some features in his methods and his subject matter that are being ignored, that are usually unnoticed, and these allow us to frame Berrocal's work in another horizon: transhumanism. In this article we examine the philosophical and aesthetic approaches of "transhumanist art" and Berrocal's work, in order to find a correlation that will allow us to propose a re-reading of his work and to update his position in the contemporary arts and aesthetics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
83%
33%
Days to publication 
95
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Universidad de Málaga (España)

Author Biography

Agustín Linares Pedrero, Universidad de Málaga

Profesor Asociado de la Universidad de Málaga

Dept. Arte y Arquitectura

References

Bostrom, N. (2011). A history of transhumanist thought. Originally published in Journal of Evolution and Technology, vol. 14 (Issue 1). April 2005; reprinted (in its present slightly edited form) in Academic Writing Across the Disciplines, eds. Michael Rectenwald & Lisa Carl (New York: Pearson Longman, 2011), pp.157-191. Recuperado de https://www.nickbostrom.com/.

Charles, N., & Carter, B. (2013). Animals, agency and resistance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43(3), pp. 322-340.

Dard, O. y Moatti A. (2016). Aux origines du mot “transhumanisme”. Futuribles, (413), pp. 85-94.

Recuperado de https://search.proquest.com/docview/1512604732?accountid=14568

Keulemans, G. (2016). The geo-cultural conditions of kintsugi. The Journal of Modern Craft, 9(1), 15-34. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496772.2016.1183946

Moya, C. (2006). Algunos rasgos de nuestro concepto preteórico de lo mental. En Filosofía de la mente (17-27). Valencia, Universitat de Valencia.

Sanmartín Arévalo, F.A. (2014). Estéticas de la hibridación, del cuerpo transhumano al cuerpo posthumano (Trabajo fin de máster, Universidad de Cuenca-Ecuador). Recuperado de http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/handle/123456789/5487

Starr R.N. (2019). Art and Transhumanism. En Lee N. (Ed.), The Transhumanism Handbook. Springer, Cham

Vita-More, N. (22 de junio de 2012). Interview with Natasha, H+ Magazine. [Transcripción] Recuperado de https://hplusmagazine.com/2012/06/22/interview-with-natasha-vita-more/

Wennerscheid S. (2019). Not in the Image of Humans: Robots as Humans’ Other in Contemporary Science Fiction Film, Literature and Art. En: Lee N. (Ed.), The Transhumanism Handbook. Springer, Cham

Published

2019-12-29

How to Cite

Pedrero, A. L. (2019). Berrocal and the transhumanist aesthetic: A transhumanist overview of Berrocal’s work. UMÁTICA. Journal on Image Creation and Analysis, 2(2), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.24310/Umatica.2019.v1i2.7880