Facing social inequality: The role of legitimacy and group identification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v7i1.13249Keywords:
Social Inequality, Legitimacy, Group Identification, Collective ActionAbstract
Social inequality has been widespread throughout human history. Nevertheless, some members of disadvantaged groups have challenged the prevailing social order with the aim of improving their group position in the social hierarchy. However, not every individual is willing to take part in this struggle. The question is, what factors lead to the fight against social inequality? In this study, we focus on the role of the perception of legitimacy and group identification in this process, as well as on collective action as one of the most direct strategies to fight inequality.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Caddick, B. (1982). Perceived illegitimacy and intergroup relations. En H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 137-154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crane, M. F. y Platow, M. J. (2010). Deviance as adherence to injunctive group norms: The overlooked role of social identification in deviance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 827-847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466609X481416
De Weerd, M. y Klandermans, B. (1999). Group identification and social protest: Farmer’s protest in the Netherlands. European Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 1073-1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<1073::AID-EJSP986>3.0.CO;2-K
Doosje, B., Spears, R. y Koomen, K. (1995). When bad isn’t all bad: The strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.642
Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of social-structural variables on identity management strategies. En W. Stroebe y M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27-57). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R. y Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: Ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617
Ellemers, N., Spears, R. y Doosje, B. (1999). Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellemers, N., Wilke, H. y Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective identity enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.766
Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A. y Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672972310009
Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Postmes, T., Spears, R., Jetten, J. y Webley, P. (2006). Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 607-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.370
Hersby, M. D., Jetten, J., Ryan, M. K. y Schmitt, M. T. (2011). Responding to group-based discrimination: The impact of social structure on willingness to engage in mentoring. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 319-335.
Hogg, M. A. (1996). Intragroup processes, group structure and social identity. En W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 65-93). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430210384417
Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C. y Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1248
Hogg, M. A. y Reid, S. A. (2001). Social identity, leadership, and power. En A. Y. Lee-Chai y J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 159-180). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Hornsey, M. J., Spears, R., Cremers, I. y Hogg, M. A. (2003). Relations between high and low power groups: The importance of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 216-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239047
Javaloy, F. (1993). El paradigma de la identidad social en el estudio del comportamiento colectivo y de los movimientos sociales. Psicothema, 5, 277-286.
Javaloy, F., Rodríguez, A. y Espelt, E. (2001). Comportamiento colectivo y movimientos sociales. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Jetten, J., Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Garza, A. A. y Mewse, A. J. (2011). Group commitment in the face of discrimination: The role of legitimacy appraisals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 116-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.743
Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00120.x
Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
Klandermans, B., Sabucedo, J. M., Rodríguez, M. y De Weerd, M. (2002). Identity processes in collective action participation: Farmers’ identity and farmers’ protest in the Netherlands and Spain. Political Psychology, 23, 235-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00280
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press. Leach, C. W., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B. et al. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T. y Smith, E. R. (2000). Inter-group emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an inter-group context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602
Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293-355). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McAuliffe, B. J., Jetten, J., Hornsey, M. J. y Hogg, M. A. (2003). Individualist and collectivist norms: When it’s OK to go your own way. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 57-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.129
McCarthy, J. D. y Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226464
Morton, T. A., Postmes, T. y Jetten, J. (2007). Playing the game: When group success is more important than downgrading deviants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 599-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.385
Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A. y Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229
Packer, D. J. (2007). On being both with us and against us: Preliminary tests of a normative conflict model of dissent. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Toronto.
Packer, D. J. (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868307309606
Packer, D. J. y Chasteen, A. L. (2010). Loyal deviance: Testing the normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167209350628
Packer, D. J. y Miners, C. T. H. (2012). At the first sign of trouble or through thick and thin? When nonconformity is and is not disengagement from a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 316-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.002
Postmes, T., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R. y Young, H. (1999). Comparative processes in personal and group judgments: Resolving the discrepancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 320-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.320
Postmes, T., Spears, R. y Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918
Postmes, T., Spears, R. y Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00761.x
Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance, and change. Political Psychology, 25, 921-945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00403.x
Rucht, D. (1994). Modernisierung und neue soziale Bewegungen [Modernization and new social movements]. Frankfurt: Campus.
Sabucedo, J. M., Durán, M. y Alzate, M. (2010). Identidad colectiva movilizada. Revista de Psicología Social, 25, 189-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021347410791063822
Sabucedo, J. M., Rodríguez-Casal, M. y Fernández, C. (2001). Identificación grupal, eficacia y protesta política. Psicología Política, 23, 85-95.
Simon, B., Trötschel, R. y Dähne, D. (2008). Identity affirmation and social movement support. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 935-946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.473
Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. En D. M. Mackie y D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes ingroup perception (pp. 297-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Spears, R., Doosje, B. y Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167297235009
Spears, R., Greenwood, R. M., de Lemus, S. y Sweetman, J. (2010). Legitimacy, social identity, and power. En A. Guinote y T. K. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 251-283). New York: The Guilford Press.
Stürmer, S. y Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual pathway model. En W. Stroebe y M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 59-99). Hove: Psychology Press.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. En H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentation between social groups (pp. 27-60). New York: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. y Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin y S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterrey, CA: Broods Cole.
Tajfel, H. y Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. En S. Worchel y W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). ChiGLORIA cago: Nelson-Hall.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Turner, J. C. y Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. En H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 201-234). London: Academic Press.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. y Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 117-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W. y Spears, R. (2010). Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1055-1060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.006
Van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W. y Spears, R. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430835
Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. y Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H. y Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
Walsh, E. y Warland, R. H. (1983). Social movement involvement in the wake of a nuclear accident: Activists and free riders in the Three Mile Island area. American Sociological Review, 48, 764-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095324
Wilkinson, R. y Pickett, K. (2009). Desigualdad. Un análisis de la (in)felicidad colectiva. Madrid: Turner.
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M. y Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). The relationship of perceptions and emotions to behavior in the face of collective inequality. Social Justice Research, 4, 229-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01048399
Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O. y Estrada, C. (2001). The interplay of naive theories and entitativity from the outsider and the insider perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 141-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_5
Zdaniuk, B. y Levine, J. M. (2001). Group loyalty: Impact of members’ identification and contributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 502-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1474
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.