Parejas de hecho: una estructura familiar olvidada que cobra importancia en el ámbito de la empresa familiar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.13.2.2023.16908Palabras clave:
Parejas de hecho, Parejas casadas, Capital familiar, Efecto en la empresa familiarResumen
Las parejas de hecho son una estructura familiar que está creciendo rápidamente en el mundo actual. Sin embargo, esta forma familiar no se ha tenido en cuenta en las investigaciones de empresa familiar. En este artículo examinamos las diferencias entre parejas que cohabitan y parejas casadas en términos de capital humano, capital social y capital financiero. Además, exploramos cómo estas diferencias pueden afectar a los resultados de las empresas propiedad de parejas casadas y parejas de hecho. Finalmente, discutimos la necesidad de considerar a las parejas de hecho como una estructura familiar en las investigaciones sobre empresa familiar, ya que pueden ayudar a comprender mejor las singularidades de estas empresas.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
Adler, P.S. & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922314
Aldrich, H.E. & Cliff, J.E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
Amato, P. (1996). Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58(3), 628-640. https://www.jstor.org/stable/353723
Amato, P., & Booth, A. (1997). A generation at risk: Growing up in an era of family upheaval. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Arregle, J.L., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of .organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x
Bailey, F. (2020). Unmarried couples and the family business. Retrieved at https://www.ifb.org.uk/resources/for-owners/unmarried-couples-and-the-family-business/
Becker, G. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with a special emphasis on education (3rd Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Blackwell, D.L. (2010). Family structure and children’s health in the United States: Findings from the National Health Interview, Survey 2001-2007. National Center for Health Statistics, Series 10, Survey N. 246. Retrieved at https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/6031
Brown, S. (2004). Family structure and child well-being: The significance of parental cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00025.x
Brown, S.L. & Manning, W.D. (2009). Family boundary ambiguity and the measurement of family structure: The significance of cohabitation. Demography, 46, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0043
Brown, S.L., Manning, W.D., & Payne, K.K. (2017). Relationship Quality Among Cohabiting Versus Married Couples. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1730-1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15622236
Bulanda, R.E., & Manning, W.D. (2008). Parental cohabitation experiences and adolescent behavioral outcomes. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 593-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9083-8
Bumpass, L. & Lu, H.H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/713779060
Cherlin, A.J. (2010). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. London: Penguin.
Coontz, S. (2006), Marriage, a history: How love conquered marriage. New York: Penguin.
Corona, J. (2021). Succession in the Family Business: The Great Challenge for the Family. European Journal of Family Business, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i1.12770
De Massis, A. & Kammerlander, N. (2020). Handbook of qualitative research methods for family business. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
Dyer, W.G. & Wilkins, A.L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory. Academy of Management Review, 16 (3), 613-619. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279492
Dyer, W.G. & Dyer, W.J. (2009). Putting the family into family business research. Family Business Review, 22(3), 216-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509333042
Dyer, W.G., Nenque, E., and Hill, E.J. (2014). Toward a theory of family capital and entrepreneurship: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 266-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12097
Dyer, W.G., (2019). The family edge: How your biggest competitive advantage in business isn’t what you’ve been taught—It’s your family. Sanger, CA: Familius.
Dyer, W.G. (2021). Family Capital: The Key to Entrepreneurial and Family Success. In: Allen, M.R., Gartner, W.B. (Eds.), Family Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66846-4_2
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Fairlie, R. W. & Robb, A. M. (2008). Race and Entrepreneurial Success. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fagan, P. (2006). Why religion matters even more: The impact of religious practice on social estability. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved at https://www.heritage.org/civil-society/report/why-religion-matters-even-more-the-impact-religious-practice-social-stability
Fitzgerald, M.A. & Muske, G. (2002). Copreneurs: An exploration and comparison to other family businesses. Family Business Review, 15(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00001.x
Fletcher, D. (2010). ‘Life-making or risk taking’? Co-preneurship and family business start-ups. International Small Business Journal, 28(5), 452-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426103703
Gallo, M.A. (2021). Coexistence, unity, professionalism and prudence. European Journal of Family Business, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i1.11973
Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Graff, N. (2019). Key findings on marriage and cohabitation in the U. S. Pew Research Center. Retrieved at https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/11/06/key-findings-on-marriage-and-cohabitation-in-the-u-s/
Guetto, R. & Panichella, N. (2019). Family arrangements and children’s educational outcomes. Demographic Research, 40, 1015-1046. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26727024
Hastings, O.P. & Schneider, D. (2021). Family structure and inequalities in parents' financial investments in children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 83, 717-736. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12741
Hilburt-Davis, J. & Dyer, W.G. (2006). Consulting to family businesses. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M., & Sorenson, R.L. (2006). Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory. Family Business Review, 19(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00065.x
Holton, J.A. & Walsh, I. (2017). Classic grounded theory: Applications with qualitative & quantitative data. Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802762
Horowitz, J., Graf, N., & Livingston, G. (2019). Marriage and cohabitation in the U.S. Pew Research Center. Retrieved at https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/11/06/marriage-and-cohabitation-in-the-u-s/
Jaskiewicz, P. & Dyer, W.G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865177004
Kapelle, N. & Lersch, P. M. (2020). The accumulation of wealth in marriage: Over-time change and within-couple inequalities. European Sociological Review, 36, 580-593. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa006
Korenman, S. & Neumark, D., (1992). Marriage, motherhood, and wages. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 233-255.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edition). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lansberg, I., Perrow, E.L., & Rogolsky, S. (1988). Family business as an emerging field. Family Business Review, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00001.x
Larson, J., (2001). The verdict on cohabitation vs. marriage. Marriage and Families. Retrieved at http://marriageandfamilies.byu.edu/issues/2001/January/cohabitation.htm
Lillard, L.A., & Waite, L.J. (1995). Till death do us part: Marital disruption and mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1131-1156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2782273
Manning, W.D. (2020). Thirty years of change in cohabitation experience in the U.S., 1987-2017. National Center for Family & Marriage Research. Family Profile N. 27. Bowling Green State University. Retrievet at https://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/manning-30-years-change-cohabitation-1987-2017-fp-20-27
Marshack, K.J. (1993). Coentrepreneurial couples: A literature review on boundaries and transitions among copreneurs. Family Business Review, 6(4), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1993.00355.x
Marripedia (2019). The effects of cohabitation on children. Retrieved at: http://marripedia.org/effects_of_cohabitation_on_children#
Mason, C. M., Carter, S., & Tagg, S. (2011). Invisible businesses: The characteristics of home-based businesses in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 45(5), 625-639. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003614241
Miller, D. (2011). Miller (1983) revisited: A reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5), 873-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00457.x
Muske, G. & Fitzgerald, M.A. (2006). A panel study of copreneurs in business: Who enters, continues, and exits? Family Business Review, 19(3), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00070.
Musick, K. & Michelmore, K. (2018). Cross-national comparisons of union stability in cohabiting and married families with children. Demography, 55(4), 1389-1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0683-6
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
Ogunjimi, B. (2022). Kurt Russell became ‘Pa’ to Goldie Hawn’s kids whose father considers them dead. Retrieved at https://news.amomama.com/288406-kurt-russell-became-pa-goldie-hawns-kids.html
Ortiz-García, P., Olaz-Capitán, A., & Monreal-Martínez, J. (2014). Family and cultural capital. The perspective of familiness. European Journal of Family Business, 4(2), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v4i2.5051
Pearson, A.W., Carr, J.C., & Shaw, J.C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949-969. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00265.x
Perelli-Harris, B., Hoherz, S., Lappegård, T., & Evans, A. (2019). Mind the “happiness” gap: The relationship between cohabitation, marriage, and subjective well-being in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Norway. Demography, 56(4), 1219-1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00792-4
Perelli‐Harris, B., & Styrc, M. (2018). Mental well‐being differences in cohabitation and marriage: The role of childhood selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12431
Pew Research Center (2019). The landscape of marriage and cohabitation in the U.S. Retrieved at https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/11/06/the-landscape-of-marriage-and-cohabitation-in-the-u-s/
Pollak, R.A. (1985). A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 581-608. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2725625
Population Europe (2022). Cohabitation across Europe: Catching up with the new normal. Retrieved at https://population-europe.eu/network/news-network/cohabitation-across-europe
Rapp, I. & Stauder, J. (2020). Mental and physical health in couple relationships: Is it better to live together? European Sociological Review, 36(2), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz047
Rosenfeld, M.J. & Roesler, K. (2019). Cohabitation experience and cohabitation's association with marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12530
Sassler, S. & Lichter, D.T. (2020). Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union-formation patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 35-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12617
Soons, J. P., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1141-1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00660.x
Sorenson, R. L. (2011). Family business and social capital. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Stanley, S.M., Whitton, S.W., & Markman, H.J. (2004). Maybe I do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25(4), 496-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X032577
Stanley, S. & Rhoads, G., (2018). Premarital cohabitation is still associated with greater odds of divorce. Institute for Family Studies. Retrieved at https://ifstudies.org/blog/premarital-cohabitation-is-still-associated-with-greater-odds-of-divorce
Umberson, D., Thomeer, M.B., & Williams, K. (2013). Family status and mental health: Recent advances and future directions. In Aneshensel, C.S., Phelan, J.C., & Bierman, A. (Eds), Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health, 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_20
United Nations (2016). Changing patterns of marriage and unions across the world. Family Planning. Population Trends. Retrieved at https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/popfacts/PopFacts_2016-2.pdf
United States Census Bureau (2022). Population Survey 2022 Annual Social and Economic Supplement. Census Bureau Statistics. Retrieved at https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2022/demo/families/cps-2022.html
Vazquez, P. & Campopiano, G. (2023). Beyond money: Wealth and wellbeing of the business family. European Journal of Family Business, 13(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.vi.15094
Vitali, A. & Fraboni, R. (2022). Pooling of wealth in marriage: The role of premarital cohabitation. European Journal of Population, 38, 721-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2
Waite, L.J. (1996). Social science finds: “Marriage matters”, Responsive Community, 6(3), 26-35.
Waite, L.J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32(4), 483-507. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061670
Williamson, O. E. (2013). The transaction cost economics project. Northhampton, MA: Elgar Publishing.
Willoughby, B.J. (2020). The Millennial Marriage. N.Y: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429292217
Willoughby, B.J. & James, S.L. (2017). The marriage paradox: Why emerging adults love marriage yet push it aside. Emerging Adulthood Series. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190296650.001.0001
Witte, J.Jr. (2012). From sacrament to contract: Marriage, religion and law in the Western tradition (2nd Edit). Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster/John Know Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Gibb Dyer, Steven Kofford, Brian J. Willoughby
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los derechos de autoría son de dos tipos: morales y patrimoniales, los cuales EJFB reconoce y respeta. Los derechos morales son los relacionados con el reconocimiento de autoría. Son prerrogativas perpetuas, irrenunciables, intransferibles, inalienables, inembargables e imprescriptibles como consecuencia del vínculo indivisible del autor/a y su obra. Los derechos patrimoniales son aquellos que se derivan de la reproducción, distribución, adaptación o comunicación pública de la obra, entre otros. Estos derechos patrimoniales son cedidos por EJFB a la Universidad de Málaga en acceso abierto.
Los autores y autoras que publican en EJFB reconocen que la revista se publica en completo acceso abierto y que está autorizada para reproducir, distribuir, difundir o comunicar el trabajo bajo una Licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Esto significa que usted es libre de compartir y adaptar este material bajo las condiciones siguientes:
- Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, lo que implica el derecho de los autores y autoras a ser reconocidos y citados correctamente.
- No Comercial — No puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales.
- Compartir Igual — Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.