Corporate Social Responsibility in Family-Owned SMEs: Examining Influential Factors Through the SGE21 Standard
Keywords:
Corporate social responsibility (CSR), Family Business, SGE21 Standard, Small and medium-sized enterprises, MexicoAbstract
This study investigates the influence of the factors established by the SGE21 standard in family businesses in a Latin American country, specifically Mexico. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a critical issue for companies, which increasingly adopt social responsibility models for ethical, philanthropic, stakeholder-driven, or competitive reasons. However, few studies focus on small and medium-sized family businesses (family SMEs) in this context. This research has two main objectives. First, it seeks to determine whether factors such as corporate governance, customers, suppliers, employees, the social and natural environment, investors, competition, public administration, and company age influence the CSR practices of family SMEs. Second, it assesses the level of CSR adoption in these businesses according to the Ethical and Socially Responsible Management System (SGE21 standard). The study analyzes data from 65 family businesses applying four types of analysis: exploratory factor, descriptive, correlational, and linear regression, employing the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method. The results indicate that most family businesses exhibit an intermediate level of adoption of the t SGE21 standard indicators. The key factors influencing CSR in family SMEs are corporate governance, suppliers, employees, and the social-natural environment. This research contributes to the existing literature by providing insights into CSR from the perspective of Latin American family businesses. It highlights that, even without prior knowledge of the variables and indicators established by the SGE21 standard, these businesses actively engage with CSR indicators due to their inherent commitment to social responsibility. Furthermore, the findings underscore the adaptability of the SGE21 standard for implementation in Latin America.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Uma Editorial, University of Malaga (Spain)
References
Alayo, M., Maseda, A., Iturralde, T., & Calabrò, A. (2023). We are family! The role of family members’ identification in the internationalization of family firms. European Management Journal, 41(5), 792-801. doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.05.006
Albers-Schoenberg, A., Zeisberger, C., Bennedsen, M., & Tatar, S. (2020). La Institucionalización de las empresas Familiares-Europa. INSEAD. Recovered from https://www.insead.edu/faculty-research/publications/reports/institutionalization-family-firms-europe
Aparicio, G., & Iturralde, T. (2023). New Research Trends in Sustainability in Family Businesses: A Bibliometric Literature Review. European Journal of Family Business, 13(1), 36-55. doi.org/ 10.24310/ejfbejfb.v13i1.16744
Aragon, C., & Iturrioz-Landart, C. (2020). How Do Family Responsible Ownership Practices Enhance Social Responsibility in Small and Medium Family Firms?. European Journal of Family Business, 10(1), 66–79. doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v10i1.6688
Arteaga, R., & Basco, R. (2023). Disentangling family firm heterogeneity: Evidence from a cross-country analysis. European Journal of Family Business, 13(2), 162–181. doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.13.2.2023.17638
Arzubiaga, U., Maseda, A., Uribarri, A., & Palma-Ruiz, J.M. (2019). Collaborative Innovation in the Family SME: Conceptualization, Goals, and Success Factors. European Journal of Family Business, 9(2), 102–114. doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v9i2.5265
Baltazar, J. R., Fernandes, C. I., Ramadani, V., & Hughes, M. (2023). Family business succession and innovation: a systematic literature review. Review Management Science, 17, 2897–2920. doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00607-8
Battisti, E., Nirino, N., Leonidou, E., & Salvi, A. (2023). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: Can corporate communication affect CSR performance? Journal of Business Research, 162, 113865. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113865
Boukhabza, S., & Ouhadi, S.(2024). Women in family business succession: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 74, 2477-2510. doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00366-0
Brenes-Cardenas, J., Reyes, C., Watkins-Fassler, K., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2024). Decent Work in Large Latin American Family Businesses: A Study of the Effects of Family Control. European Journal of Family Business, 14(2), 225–237. doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.14.2.2024.19826
Breusch, T., & Pagan, A. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economics Studies, 47(1), 239-253. doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Cardona, A.D., Cortina, Y. L., & Castillo, R. S. (2024). Responsabilidad social en la gestión pública: caso de un municpio del departamento de Bolívar. Revisya AGLALA, 15(1), 263-273. Retrieved from https://revistas.uninunez.edu.co/index.php/aglala/article/view/2471
Carrasco-Venturelli, H., Canchón-Zagalaz, J., Lara-Sánchez, A.J., & Ubago-Jiménez, J. L. (2024). Validation and Adaptation of Questionnaires on Interest, Effort, Progression and Learning Support in Chilean Adolescents. Sustainability, 16(5), 1809. doi.org/10.3390/su16051809
Carrillo, P.A., Galarza, T.S., Fernández, L.A., Armijos R.L., Cuevas, O.B., & Tipán, T. L. (2023). Cooperative Social Responsibility: Integration of CSR Models and Social Balance. Migration Letters, 20(S9), 1007-1020. doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS9.4941
Cervantes, R. M., De Anda, M. M., & Rojas, E.D. (2023). Las empresas familiares y el desarrollo sostenible: los retos ante la pandemia de COVID-19. En Rivera, A. P. y Neri, G. J.C. (2023). Repensar La Agenda 2030 Tendencias de sostenibilidad. Ediciones Comunicación Científica, México. doi.org/10.52501/cc.064.12
Citterio, A., Locatelli, R., & Uselli, A. (2024). Mapping Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: A Bibliometric Review across Countries. Sustainability, 16(2), 10.3390/su16020500. doi.org/10.3390/su16020500
Clarke, R. (2023). Avoiding the Negative Impact of Nepotism in Family Business. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/rochellemclarke/2023/01/16/avoiding-the-negative-impact-of-nepotism-in-family-business/?sh=5250c4c15823
De la Fuente, F. S. (2011). Regresión Múltiple. Facultad Ciencias Económicas Empresariales UAM-2011. Recovered from https://www.estadistica.net/ECONOMETRIA/MULTIVARIANTE/REGRE_MULTIPLE/regresion-multiple.pdf
De Oliveira, N. V., & Smith, V. (2012). Indicadores Ethos de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial. Instituto ETHOS. Recovered from https://www.ethos.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/111.pdf
Diéguez-Soto, J., Campos-Valenzuela, M, Callejón-Gil, A., & Aldeanueva-Fernández, I. (2024). Family firm heterogeneity on CSR approach: A socio-emotional (SEW) perspective. BRQ Business Research Quartely, 27(4), 443-466. doi.org/10.1177/23409444211063889
Donoso, D. (2023). México es el país de Latinoamérica con más empresas familiares y lidera además ranking regional por ingresos totales. Df SUD. Recovered from https://dfsud.com/america/mexico-es-el-pais-de-latinoamerica-con-mas-empresas-familiares-pero-los
Endo, K. (2020). Corporate governance beyond the shareholder–stakeholder dichotomy: Lessons from Japanese corporations’ environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1625–1633. doi.org/10.1002/bse.2457
Forética (2008). Norma para la Evaluación de la Gestión Ética y Socialmente Responsable en las Organizaciones, SGE21. Forética. Recovered from http://www.foretica.org/sge_21_espanol.pdf
Forética (2017). Sistema de Gestión Ética y Socialmente Responsable (SGE21). Forética. Recovered from https://foretica.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/norma_SGE_21.pdf
Gabler, C. B., Landers, V. M., & Itani, O. S. (2023). Sustainability and professional sales: a review and future research agenda. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 4, 336-353. doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2023.2244675
García-Valenzuela, V., Gómez-Alvarez, P., & Cota-Betran, J. (2021). Sector y antigüedad como factores pertinentes en la perspectiva del empresario colombiano con relación a la capacidad de absorción. VinculaTégica, 7(1), 120-129. doi.org/10.29105/vtga7.2-7
Greene, W. (2018). Econometric Analysis. Pearson.
GRI. (2024). Consolidated Set of the GRI Standards. Sustainability Reporting Standards. Recovered from https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
Gujarati, D., & Porter, D. (2010). Econometría. México: McGraw-Hill.
Herrero, I., López, C., & Ruiz‐Benítez, R. (2024). So… are family firms more sustainable? On the economic, social and environmental sustainability of family SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4252-4270. doi.org/10.1002/bse.3699
INEGI (2024). Directorio Estadístico Nacional de Unidades Económicas. Recovered from https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/mapa/denue/default.aspx
ISO Standard (2010). ISO 26000 visión general del proyecto. ISO. Recovered from http://www.iso.org/iso/ISO_26000_project_overview-es.pdf
Kaimal, A., & Uzma, S.H. (2024). Corporate social responsibility expenditure and financial performance: the moderating role of family ownership. Corporate Governance, 24(1), 101-118. doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0128
Kechli, W. (2023). Family Business Succession Planning into the Second Generation. United Kingdom: University of Liverpool.
Kolmogorov, A.N. (1933). Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione. Giornale dell’ Istituto Italianodegli Attuari, 4, 83-91.
Kurowska-Pysz, J., Czart, P., & Kot, S. (2024). Familiness as a Determinant of Competitiveness of Family Businesses-The Organisational Effectiveness-Based Approach. Journal of Competitiveness, 16(2). doi.org/10.7441/joc.2024.02.10
Leyva, R. J. (February 10, 2022). Empresas familiares representan el 90% de las unidades de negocio de México. El Financiero. Recovered from https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/economia/2022/02/10/empresas-familiares-representan-el-90-de-las-unidades-de-negocio-de-mexico/
Lyulyov, O., Chygryn, O., Pimonenko, T., & Kwilinski, A. (2023). Stakeholders’ Engagement in the Company’s Management as a Driver of Green Competitiveness within Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 15(9), 7249. doi.org/10.3390/su15097249
Manzano-Garíca, G., Jean-Pierre, N., Campos, C. A., & Ayala-Calvo, J.C. (2023). Family firms types based on beliefs. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 29(3), 100225. doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2023.100225
Mariani, M. M., Al-Sultan, K., & De Massis, A. (2023). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1192-1246. doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955122
Martín C. P. J., & Aroca L. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in family SMEs: A comparative study. European Journal of Family Business, 6(1), 21-31. doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v6i1.5044
Mora, O. T., & De la O, C. D. (2023). Prácticas sociales de RSE en empresas familiares. ¿Contribuyen a la sostenibilidad empresarial y los ODS 3, 4, 5 y 8? Una revisión sistemática de la literature. The Anáhuac Journal, 23(2), 96-121. doi.org/10.36105/theanahuacjour.2023v23n2.04
Nahar, K., & Khurana, D. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility. Vidhyayana-An International Multidisciplinary Peer-Reviewed, 8(si6), 724-732. Recovered from http://vidhyayanaejournal.org/journal/article/view/779
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (2005). Teoría psicométrica. México: McGraw Hill Interamericana.
Ollinyk, O., Mishchuk, H, Vasa, L., & Kozma, K. (2023). Social Responsibility: Opportunities for Integral Assessment and Analysis of Connections with Business Innovation. Sustainability, 15(6), 5608. doi.org/10.3390/su15065608
Pallares, M. (2023). México es el quinto país con más empresas familiares a nivel mundial. El Financiero. Recovered from https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/archivo/mexico-es-el-quinto-pais-con-mas-empresas-familiares-a-nivel-mundial/
Patuelli, A., Carungu, J., & Lattanzi, N. (2022). Drivers and nuances of sustainable development goals: Transcending corporate social responsibility in family firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 1-8. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133723
Pérez, R., & López, A.J. (2019). Econometría Aplicada con Gretl. Ed. Universidad de Oviedo.
Ríos-Manríquez, M. Conraud, K. E., Ferrer, G.J., & Sánchez-Fernández, M.D. (2023). La Gestión del Comité Ético de las Empresas Medianas: Un Estudio Empírico. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 66, 63-80. doi.org/10.59072/rper.vi66.40
Ríos-Manríquez, M., Ferrer-Ríos, M.G., & Sánchez-Fernández, M.D. (2021). Structural model of corporate social responsibility. An empirical study on Mexican SMEs. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0246384. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246384
Ríos, M. M., & Sánchez, F. M.D. (2020). Responsabilidad social empresarial. Las Pymes en una economía emergente. Editorial fontamara, México.
Risi, D., Vigneau, L., Bohn, S., & Wickert, C. (2023). Institutional theory‐based research on corporate social responsibility: Bringing values back in. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3-23. doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12299
Rivo-López, E., Villanueva-Villar, M., Michinel-Álvarez, M., & Reyes-Santías, F. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Family Business in the Time of COVID-19: Changing Strategy?. Sustainability, 13, 2041. doi.org/10.3390/su13042041
Rizo, R.M. (2018). Vino añejo: edad y tamaño del negocio familiar. Forbes. Recovered from https://www.forbes.com.mx/vino-anejo-edad-y-tamano-del-negocio-familiar/
Rovelli, P., Ferasso, M., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2022). Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100422. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100422
Rueda, J. F., & Rueda, M. A. (2019). Definición, importancia y análisis de la empresa familiar. Lúmina, (20), 8-28. doi.org/10.30554/lúmina.20.3260.2019
Ruiviejo, A. C.A., & Sotomayor Morales, E.M. (2016). Social responsibility in the Spanish financial system. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(1), 103-116. doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2015-0012
Salehnezhad, S. H., Amin, V., & Rezaee, S. M. (2023). The Effect of Board Independence on the Relationship between Ownership Structure and Corporate Sustainability Performance Disclosure. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 7(3), 87-103. doi: 10.22067/ijaaf.2023.43459.1243
Serfraz, A., Munir, Z, Mehta, A.M., & Qamruzzaman, M. (2022). Nepotism Effects on Job Satisfaction and Withdrawal Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Social, Ethical and Economic Factors from Pakistan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(3), 311-318. doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no3.0311
Solarte, S. C., Solarte, S. M., & Barahona, V. J. (2020). Cultura organizacional e innovación en la orientación al mercado de empresas familiares de Pasto (Colombia). Contaduría y administración, 65(1), 1-25. doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2019.1725
Stock, C., Pütz, L., Schell, S., & Werner, A. (2024). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: Status and future directions of a research field. Journal of business ethics, 190(1), 199-259. doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05382-4
Stüber, A., & Jarchow, Z. (2023). Family oblige: the link between CSR and succession intention in small and medium family firms. Journal of Business Economics, 93, 389–431. doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01113-9
Sun, J., Pellegrini, M.M., Dabić, M., Wang, K., & Wang, C. (2024). Family ownership and control as drivers for environmental, social, and governance in family firms. Review of Managerial Science.18, 1015 -1046. doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00631-2
Sun, Y. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Age: In Technology Sector. SSRN Market Intelligence 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3833187
Thorben, J. T. (2023). Family business and sustainability communication (Mestrado Bolonha em Management). Universidade de Lisboa. Instituto Superior de Economía e Gestão. Recovered from http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/27937
Thuy, H. X., Khuong, N. V., Anh, L. H., & Quyen, P. N. (2024). Effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility in Vietnam: state-ownership as the moderating role. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(3), 701-727. doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-10-2021-0367
Torres, L., Ripa, D., Jain, A., Herrero, J., & Leka, S. (2023). The potential of responsible business to promote sustainable work – An analysis of CSR/ESG instruments. Safety Science, 164. 106151. doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106151
Venturelli, A., Principale, S., Ligorio, L., & Cosma, S. (2021). Walking the talk in family firms. An empirical investigation of CSR communication and practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 28 (1), 497-510. doi.org/10.1002/csr.2064
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2020). Family ownership. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(2), 241–257. doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa007
Ye, Y., & Li, K. (2020). Impact of family involvement on internal and external corporate social responsibilities: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1),352-365. doi.org/10.1002/csr.2053
Yüzbaşı, B., & Ahmed, S. E. (2020). Ridge Type Shrinkage Estimation of Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Analytics of Economic and Financial Data from “Fragile Five” Countries. Journal Risk Financial Management 13(6), 131. doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13060131
Zinkann, F. (2024). Ethical decision making and sustainability in family firms: the role of the business model and motivation on sustainability. Disertation, zur Erlangung des Grades einer Doktorin/eines Doktors rer. Pol, Universitätsbibliothek Siegen. http://dx.doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/10559
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Martha Ríos-Manríquez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright generates two different rights: moral rights and patrimonial rights that EJFB recognizes and respects. Moral rights are those relating to the recognition of the authorship. They are rights of a personal nature that are perpetual, inalienable, unseizable and imprescriptible as consequence of the indivisible union of the author and his/her work. Patrimonial rights are those that can be derived from the reproduction, distribution, adaptation or communication of the work, among others.
Authors who publish in EJFB retain the copyright of their work and grant the right of its first publication to the journal in open access. EJFB is authorized to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or communicate the work under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License. This means that you are free to share and adapt this work under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to its author(s), which implie the right to be reconognized and cited correctly.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.