Tennis competition statistics differences in Rio de Janeiro 2016 olympic games

Authors

  • Bernardino Javier Sánchez-Alcaraz Martínez Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Murcia
  • Javier Courel-Ibáñez Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Murcia Spain
  • José Luís Fernández-Amor Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Murcia Spain
  • Alejandro Sánchez-Pay Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Murcia Spain
  • M Alfonso-Asencio Consejería de Educación Murcia Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.2019.v8i3.7486

Keywords:

performance analysis, racket sports, professional tennis, serve, return

Abstract

This research aimed to explore the competition statistics at the Rio de Janeiro JJOO 2016. To this end, 282 sets of the 128 matches played were analysed; a total of 128 tennis players (64 players male and 64 players female) took part. Data have been selected of the published information on the Official Web of the International Tennis Federation (http://www.itftennis.com/olimpiadas/cuadros). Results showed that male gender obtained significant statistical values in the variables related to the service, while female gender obtained better values in variables related to the rest. With regard to the Laterality, no significant differences were found between left-handed and right-handed in the male gender. In the female gender the left-handed players obtained significantly higher values in the percentage of points won with the first and second serve, number of break points and number of points earned to the rest. The information obtained in this paper sets performance parameters that can be used to set targets and evaluate the performance of tennis players.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Alejandro Sánchez-Pay, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Murcia


References

Elmenshawy AR, Machin DR, Tanaka H. A rise in peak performance age in female athletes. Age (Omaha). 2015;37(3).

Torres-Luque G, Fernández-García ÁI, Blanca-Torres JC, Kondric M, Cabello-Manrique D. Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2019;10:731. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00731

Malagoli Lanzoni I, Di Michele R, Merni F. A notational analysis of shot characteristics in top-level table tennis players. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(4):309–17.

Garganta J. Trends of tactical performance analysis in team sports: bridging the gap between research, training and competition. Rev Port Ciências do Desporto. 2016;9(1):81–9.

Hughes MD, Bartlett RM. The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. Vol. 20, Journal of Sports Sciences. 2002. p. 739–54.

Courel-Ibáñez J. Análisis de la competición en pádel. In: Courel-Ibañez J, Cañas J, Sánchez-Alcaraz BJ, Alarcón R, editors. Investigación en pádel. Diego Marí. Murcia; 2014. p. 15–24.

Rein R, Memmert D. Big data and tactical analysis in elite soccer: future challenges and opportunities for sports science. Vol. 5, SpringerPlus. 2016.

Cross R, Pollard G. Datos sobre partidos de individual masculinos en Grand Slam 1991-2009. La velocidad del servicio y otros datos relacionados. Coach Sport Sci Rev. 2009;16(49):8–10.

Cross R, Pollard G. El tenis en los Grand Slams individuales de varones entre 1995 y 2009. Parte 2: Puntos, Juegos y Sets. Coach Sport Sci Rev. 2011;19(53):3–6.

Filip?i? T, Filip?i? A, Berendijaš T. Comparison of game characteristics of male and female tennis players at Roland Garros 2005. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Gymnica. 2008;38(3).

Kati? R, Milat S, Zagorac N, DJurovi? N. Impact of game elements on tennis match outcome in Wimbledon and Roland Garros 2009. Coll Antropol. 2011;35(2):341–6.

O’donoghue PG. The most important points in grand slam singles tennis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72(2):125–31.

Sánchez-Pay A, Palao JM, Torres-Luque G, Sanz-Rivas D. Differences in set statistics between wheelchair and conventional tennis on different types of surfaces and by gender. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2015;15(3):1177–88.

Brown E, O’Donoghue P. Gender and surface effect on elite tennis strategy. Coach Sport Sci Rev Sport Sci Rev [Internet]. 2008;46:9–11. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=36007654&lang=es&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Carboch J. Comparison of game characteristics of male and female tennis players at grand-slam tournaments in 2016. Trends Sport Sci. 2017;24(4):151–5.

Hizan H, Whipp P, Reid M. Comparison of serve and serve return statistics of high performance male and female tennis players from different age-groups. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2011;11(2):365–75.

Reid M, Morgan S, Whiteside D. Matchplay characteristics of Grand Slam tennis: implications for training and conditioning. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(19):1791–8.

Hughes M, Clark S. Surface effect on elite tennis strategy. In: Lees A, editor. Science and racket sports. London: E &FN Spon; 1995. p. 272–7.

O’Donoghue P, Ingram B. A notational analysis of elite tennis strategy. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(2):107–15.

Miller S. Modern tennis rackets, balls, and surfaces. Vol. 40, British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006. p. 400–5.

Sánchez-Muñoz C, Sanz D, Zabala M. Anthropometric characteristics, body composition and somatotype of elite junior tennis players. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(11):793–9.

O’Donoghue P, Ballantyne A. The impact of speed of service in Grand Slam singles tennis. In: Science and Racket Sports III: The Proceedings of the Eighth International Table Tennis Federation Sports Science Congress and the Third World Congress of Science and Racket Sports. 2004.

Sakurai S, Reid M, Elliott B. Ball spin in the tennis serve: Spin rate and axis of rotation. Sport Biomech. 2013;12(1):23–9.

Whiteside D, Reid M. Spatial characteristics of professional tennis serves with implications for serving aces: A machine learning approach. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(7):648–54.

Kovalchik SA, Reid M. Comparing matchplay characteristics and physical demands of junior and professional tennis athletes in the era of big data. J Sport Sci Med. 2017;16(4):489–97.

Reid M, McMurtrie D, Crespo M. The relationship between match statistics and top 100 ranking in professional men’s tennis. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2010;10(2):131–8.

Courel-Ibáñez J, Sánchez-Alcaraz BJ. The role of hand dominance in padel: performance profiles of professional players. Motricidade. 2018;14(4):33–41.

Hagemann N. The advantage of being left-handed in interactive sports. Attention, Perception, Psychophys. 2009;71(7):1641–8.

Holtzen DW. Handedness and professional tennis. Int J Neurosci. 2000;105(1–4):101–19.

Loffing F, Hagemann N, Strauss B. The serve in professional men’s tennis: effects of players’ handedness. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2009;9(2):255–74.

Menayo R, Fuentes JP, Moreno FJ, Clemente R, García T. The relationship between the speed of the ball and precision in the flat service in development tennis players [Internet]. Motricidad: European Journal of Human Movement. 2008. p. 17–30. Available from: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3323285&info=resumen&idioma=ENG

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Sánchez-Alcaraz Martínez, B. J., Courel-Ibáñez, J., Fernández-Amor, J. L., Sánchez-Pay, A., & Alfonso-Asencio, M. (2019). Tennis competition statistics differences in Rio de Janeiro 2016 olympic games. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencias De La Actividad Física Y El Deporte, 8(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.2019.v8i3.7486

Issue

Section

Artículos

Most read articles by the same author(s)