El método TOPSIS relativo vs. absoluto

Authors

  • Blanca Ceballos Universidad de Granada Spain
  • M. Teresa Lamata Universidad de Granada Spain
  • David Pelta Universidad de Granada Spain
  • Juan Miguel Sánchez Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena Spain

Keywords:

Problemas de decisión multicriterio, AHP, TOPSIS, modo relativo, modo absoluto

Abstract

Multicriteria decision making methods are essential tools to make decisions in the corporate world. We focus here in the TOPSIS method to analyze the impact that, the way the decision matrix is constructed affects the final results. Two different ways are analized: firstly, the original matrix is considered, and secondly, a variant including two novel alternatives is used. These alternatives are constructed taking into account the range of the corresponding criteria. We made comparisons using a location problem derived from the renewable energy field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
4%
33%
Days to publication 
3796
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
UMA Editorial. Universidad de Málaga

Published

2013-12-31

How to Cite

Ceballos, B., Lamata, M. T., Pelta, D., & Sánchez, J. M. (2013). El método TOPSIS relativo vs. absoluto. Revista Electrónica De Comunicaciones Y Trabajos De ASEPUMA, 14(2), 181–192. Retrieved from https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/recta/article/view/19967