Human and non-human political animals: Aristotle’s “metaphysical biology” as the basis of political animality

Antonio Oraldi

doi:10.24310/NATyLIB.2023.vi17.16505

Authors

Antonio Oraldi Universidade de Lisboa Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/NATyLIB.2023.vi17.16505

Keywords:

political animal, Aristotle, politics, nature, ergon, non-human animal

Abstract

In one of the most famous passages of the Politics, Aristotle claims that “man is a political animal” (zoon politikòn) (Pol. I.2 1253a4). Having led to countless interpretations, this formula is still a matter of contention. In this paper, some of the main interpretive strategies will be presented and evaluated. The first section will outline three major ones: the exclusive, the inclusive, and a wider, zoological one (or what might be termed as the “common ergon” interpretation). The rest of the paper will support a biological interpretation of zoon politikòn, which places a central emphasis on Aristotle’s literal treatment (as opposed to metaphoric) of some non-human animals as political in some of his biological works as well as in the Politics. The categorisations of human and non-human political animals in History of Animals suggest a complex non-dualistic picture, which entails the possibility of some humans becoming non-political and some animals being fully political. While providing a literal biological interpretation of political animality, it will also be necessary to specify that Aristotle’s biology is a “metaphysical biology”, as MacIntyre put it (2007). It is not a modern, evolutionary kind of biology, and it is grounded in a broader metaphysical concept of nature.

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views

162

References

Aristotle (2002) Historia Animalium. Ed. and trans. by David M. Balme. Cambridge: Cambridge Press

Aristotle, (2009) Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. by W. D. Ross, Introduction and notes by Lesley Brown. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Aristotle (2009) Politics. Trans by Ernest Barker, Introduction and notes by R. F. Stalley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Abbate, C. E. (2016) “"Higher" and "Lower" Political Animals: A Critical Analysis of Aristotle's Account of the Political Animal” Journal of Animal Ethics, 6(1), 54-66. University of Illinois Press in partnership with the Ferrater Mora Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/janimalethics.6.1.0054

Achtenberg, D. (1992) “On the metaphysical presuppositions of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics” The Journal of Value Inquiry, 26: 317-340. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140935

Arnhart, L. (1994) “The Darwinian Biology of Aristotle's Political Animals”. American Journal of Political Science 38 (2), 464-485.

Baker, S. (2015). The Concept of Ergon: Towards an Achievement Interpretation of Aristotle’s ‘Function Argument’. In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Volume 48. Oxford University Press.

Balme, D..M. (1962). Development of Biology in Aristotle and Theophrastus: Theory of Spontaneous Generation, Phronesis, 7(1-2), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852862X00052

Balme, D. M. (1980). “Aristotle’s Biology was not Essentialist”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 62(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1980.62.1.1

Bennington, G. (2011) “Geoffrey Bennington. Political Animals. 2011” European Graduate School Video Lectures https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxY3iNeQ0zA

Cooper, J. (1988) “Metaphysics in Aristotle's Embryology”. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 34, 14-41. doi:10.1017/S0068673500005022

Depew, D. J. (1995) “Humans and Other Political Animals in Aristotle's "History of Animals"”. Phronesis 40 (2), 156-181. Brill. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4182496

Keyt, D. (1987) “Three Fundamental Theorems in Aristotle's "Politics"” Phronesis, 32(1), 54-79. Brill. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182267

Labarrière, J. (2016). “Que fait la nature en politique selon Aristote ? Retour sur la définition de l’homme comme « animal politique par nature »”. Revue de philosophie ancienne, 34(2), 141-160. doi:10.3917/rpha.342.0141.

Lennox, J. G. (1980) “Aristotle on Genera, Species, and “the More and the Less”” Journal of the History of Biology, 13 (2) (Fall 1980), pp. 321- 346

Lennox, J.G. (2012). “Aristotle's Biology and Aristotle's Philosophy” in A Companion to Ancient Philosophy (eds M.L. Gill and P. Pellegrin). doi:10.1002/9781444305845.ch16

Leroi, A. (2020) “Aristotle's Biology — Armand Leroi / Serious Science” Serious Science. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frVUd4V5ZTk

MacIntyre, A. (2007) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Third Edition. University of Notre Dame Press

Mayhew, R. (1997) “Part and Whole in Aristotle‘s Political Philosophy”. The Journal of Ethics 1, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009743012461

Miller Jr., F. D. (1989). “Aristotle's Political Naturalism” Apeiron, 22(4), 195-218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.1989.22.4.195

Mulgan, R. G. (1974) “Aristotle's Doctrine That Man Is a Political Animal”. Hermes, 102. H. 3, 438-445. Franz Steiner Verlag, https://www.jstor.org/stable/4475868

O’Rourke, F. (2012) “Aristotle’s Political Anthropology” in Politics of Practical Reasoning Integrating Action, Discourse and Argument, eds. Ricca Edmondson and Karlheinz Hülser, 17-38. Plymouth: Lexington Books

Schofield, M. (2006) “Aristotle’s Political Ethics” in The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Kraut, R., 305-322. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.