Some Reflections on the Right to Beauty in Cities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Metyper.2022.vi27.14204

Keywords:

beauty, proportion, city, obligations, rights

Abstract

This critical note intends to analyze into the implications of defending a right to beauty in cities, taking as a starting point both the Heideggerian notion of ‘inhabiting’ and Whyte’s characterization of ‘right’. The underlying thesis is that beauty contributes to making every city a livable place, which implies certain obligations both for those who govern them and for those who inhabit them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aristóteles, Metafísica, traducción de Calvo Martínez, T., Madrid: Gredos, 2014.

González, J., El ethos, destino del hombre, México: UNAM/FCE, 2007.

Heidegger, M., “Construir, habitar, pensar”, en Conferencias y artículos, traducción de Barjau, E., Barcelona: Ediciones Serbal, 1994, pp. 127-142.

Mansur, J.C., “Habitar la ciudad”, en Open Insight, VIII, núm. 14, 2017, pp. 9-24.

Mansur, J.C., Kant. Ontología y belleza, México: Herder, 2010.

Whyte, J., “The Right to your Opinion”, en Crimes Against Logic. Exposing the Bogus Arguments of Politicians, Priests, Jounalists, and Other Serial Offenders, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.

Published

2022-01-31

How to Cite

Casales García, R. (2022). Some Reflections on the Right to Beauty in Cities. Metafísica Y Persona, (27), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.24310/Metyper.2022.vi27.14204

Issue

Section

Critical Notes