Theory of Personality: An Interactive Behavioral Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/escpsi.17.1.2024.15796Keywords:
personality, interactive style, self-reports, objective tests, behaviorAbstract
In this paper we propose the keys to a theory of personality from a behavioral perspective. It describes how, in the same context, each individual could generate consistent and idiosyncratic response tendencies. We analyze the characteristics of the contexts that generate personality. We argue that the individual synthesizes his own experience and updates it with what he has just learned, to act quickly, integrating what he has learned through verbal and non-verbal behaviors that are not always coherent. To predict individuals’ behaviors, we can study self-reports or behavioral trends. Finally, we will explain how the structure of personality can be understood from a behavioral approach by defining types of contexts and types of learning.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web‐based e‐learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of educational technology, 36(2), 217-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x
Arend, I., Botella, J., Contreras, M. J., Hernández, J. M., & Santacreu, J. (2003). A betting dice test to study the interactive style of risk-taking behavior. The Psychological Record, 53 (2), 217-230.
Bandura, A. (1975). Analysis of modeling processes. School Psychology Review, 4(1), 4-10.
Block, J. (1993). Studying personality, the long way. In D Funder, RD Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasey, & K Widaman (Eds.), Studying lives through time (pp. 9-44). American Psychogical Association.
Cattell, R.B. & Schuerger, J.M. (1978). Personality theory in action. Handbook for the Objective-Analytic (O-A) Test Kit. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Cattell, R.B. & Warburton, F.W. (1967). Objective Personality and Motivation Tests: A Theoretical Introduction and Practical Compendium. University of Illinois Press.
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. The Dryden Press.
Ferster, C.B. & Skinner, B.F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Appleton Century Crofts.
Groves, P. M., & Thompson, R. F. (1970). Habituation: a dual-process theory. Psychological review, 77(5), 419-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0029810
Harzem, P. (1984). Experimental analysis of individual differences and personality. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 385-395.
Henton, W. W., & Iversen, I. H. (2012). Classical conditioning and operant conditioning: A response pattern analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
Hernández, J. M., Santacreu, J., & Rubio, V. J. (1999). Evaluación de la personalidad: una alternativa teórico-metodológica. Escritos de Psicología, (3), 20-28.
Hull, C.L. (1943). Principles of Behavior. Appleton-Century
Knapp, T. J. (1976). The Premack principle in human experimental and applied settings. Behavior Research and Therapy, 14 (2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(76)90067-x
Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L. & Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8 (2), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-898x.8.2.75
McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. Guilford.
McDonald, J. D. (2008). Measuring personality constructs: The advantages and disadvantages of self-reports, informant reports and behavioral assessments. Enquire, 1(1), 1-19.
Morse, W.H. & Kelleher, R.T. (1977). Determinants of reinforcement and punishment. In W.K. Honig & J.E.R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 174-200). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Neuringer, A. & Jensen, G. (2010). Operant variability and voluntary action. Psychological Review, 117(3), 972-993. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019499
Neuringer, A., & Jensen, G. (2013). Operant variability. In G. J. Madden, W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), APA handbook of behavior analysis, Vol. 1. Methods and principles (pp. 513–546). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13937-022
Odum, A.L., Ward, R.D., Barnes, C.A. & Burke, K.A. (2006). The effects of delayed reinforcement on variability and repetition of response sequences. Journal of Experimental and Analysis Behavior. 86 (2), 159-179.
Rankin, C. H., Abrams, T., Barry, R. J., Bhatnagar, S., Clayton, D. F., Colombo, J., ... & Thompson, R. F. (2009). Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 92(2), 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2008.09.012
Razran, G. (1971). Mind in evolution: An East-West synthesis of learned behavior and cognition. Houghton Mifflin.
Ribes, E. & Sánchez, S. (1992). Individual behavior consistencies as interactive styles: their relation to personality. The Psychological Record, 42, 369-387.
Rubio, V.J., Hernández, J.M., Zaldívar, F., Márquez, M.O. & Santacreu, J. (2010). Can we predict risk-taking behavior? Two behavioral tests for predicting guessing tendencies in a multiple-choice test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 87-94.
Scheier, I. H. (1958). What is an “objective” test? Psychological Reports, 4(1), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1958.4.g.147
Santacreu, J. (2013) Behavioral variability and consistency: Experimental bases for a psychological theory of personality. Escritos de Psicología, 6 (1), 20-27.
Santacreu, J., Hernández, J.M., Adarraga, P., & Márquez, M.O. (2002). La Personalidad en el Marco de una Teoría del Comportamiento Humano [Personality in the Framework of a Theory of Human Behavior]. Ediciones Pirámide.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. Appleton-Century.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Staddon, J. E. R. & Cerutti, D. T. (2003) Operant conditioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145124
Woodworth, R.S. (1918). Dynamic Psychology. Columbia University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Miriam Romero, Jose Santacreu, Jose Manuel Hernández
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
10.png)
ESCRITOS DE PSICOLOGÍA por 