Attention and inhibition in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v6i3.13288Keywords:
Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer Disease, Attention, Processing Speed, CANTABAbstract
Mild cognitive impairment is understood as a cognitive deficit of insufficient severity to fulfil the criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. Many studies have attempted to identify which cognitive functions are most affected by this type of impairment and which is the most sensitive neuropsychological test for early detection. This study investigated sustained and selective attention, processing speed, and the inhibition process using a sample of people divided into three groups mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer disease and cognitively healthy controls selected and grouped based on their scores in the Mini Mental State Examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination-revised. Three tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (Motor Screening Task, Stop Signal Task and Reaction time) were used as well as the d2 attention test. The results show that that participants with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease showed lower levels of concentration compared with the cognitively healthy controls group in the d2 test and longer reaction times in the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, although the differences were not marked in the latter test. The impairments in basic cognitive processes, such as reaction time and sustained attention, indicate the need to take these functions into account in the test protocols when discriminating between normal aging and early and preclinical dementia processes.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aharonson, V., Halperin, I. & Korczyn, A. (2007). Computerized diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer´s Dement, 3, 23-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2006.10.001
Albert, M. S., Moss, M. B., Tanzi, R. & Jones, K. (2001). Preclinical prediction of AD using neuropsychological tests. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 631–639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355617701755105
Ballesteros, S., Mayas, J. & Reales, J.M. (2013). Cognitive function in normal aging and in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Psicothema, 25, 18-24.
Brickenkamp, R. (1962). Test de atención d2. Adaptación española: Nicolás Seisdedos Cubero (2004) (2º edición, revisada y ampliada). Madrid: TEA Ediciones, S.A.
Dorion, A. Sarazin, M., Hasboun, D., Hahn-Barma, V., Dubois, B., Zoauoui, A.,Marsault, C. & Duyme, M. (2002). Relationship between attentional performance andcorpus callosum morfometry in patients with Alzheimer disease. Neuropsychologia, 40, 946-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00150-6
Dubois, B., Feldman, H.H., Jacova, C., Cummings, J.L., Dekosky, S.T., Barberger-Gateau, P., Delacourte, A., Frisoni, G., Fox, N.C., Galasko, D., Gauthier, S., Hampel, H., Jicha, G.A., Meguro, K., O’Brien, J., Pasquier, F., Robert, P., Rossor, M., Salloway, S., Sarazin, M., de Souza, L.C., Stern, Y., Visser, P.J. & Scheltens, P. (2010). Revising the definition of Alzheimer’s disease: a new lexicon. Lancet Neurology 9, 1118-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70223-4.
Egerházi, A., Berecz, R., Bartók, E. & Degrell, I. (2007). Automated neuropsychological Test Baterry (CANTAB) in mild cognitive impairment and in Alzheimer´s disease. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 31, 746-751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.01.011
Estévez-González, A., García-Sánchez, C., Boltes, A., García-Nonell, C., Rigau-Ratera, E., Otermín, P., Gironell, A. & Kulisevsky, J. (2003). Atención sostenida en la fase preclínica de la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Revista de Neurología, 36, 829-832.
Facal, D., Rodríguez, N., Juncos-Rabadán, O., Manuel Caamaño, J. & Sueiro, J. (2009). Utilización del CANTAB para el diagnostico del deterioro cognitivo leve. Un estudio piloto con una muestra española. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 44, 79-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2008.07.004
Fernandez-Duque, D. & Black, S.E. (2006). Attentional Networks in normal aging and Alzheimer´s disease. Neuropsychology, 20, 133-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.133
Fischer, P., Jungwirth, S., Zehetmayer, S., Weissgram, S., Hoenigschnabl, S., Gelpi, E., Krampla, W. & Tragl, K.H. (2007).Conversion from subtypes of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer dementia. Neurology, 68, 288-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000252358.03285.9d
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E. & McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Fujisawa, Y., Yonezawa, H., Suzuki, M., Kudo, M., Shibata, T., Obara, S., Ishizuka, N., Takahashi, J. & Terayama, Y. (2013). Development of a novel one-phrase screening test for early Alzheimer disease. Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics 50, 392-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.3143/geriatrics.50.392
Gainotti, G., Marra, C. & Villa, G. (2001). A double dissociation between accuracy and time of execution on attentional tasks in Alzheimer’s disease and multi-infarct dementia. Brain, 124, 731-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.4.731
García, J. (1997). Psicología de la atención. Madrid: Síntesis.
Garre-Olmo, J. (2008). Evolución de los síntomas psicológicos y conductuales de la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Un ejemplo de aplicación de modelos de crecimiento latente para datos longitudinales. Alzheimer. Realidades e investigación en demencias 40, 4-13.
Gutzmann, H. (1988). Senile Demenz vom Alzheimer Typ. Klinische, computertomographische und elektoenzephalographische Befunde. Stuttgart: Enke Verlag.
Heinik, J. & Solomesh, I. (2007). Validity of the Cambridge Cognitive Examination-Revised new executive function scores in the diagnosis of dementia: some early findings. Neurology 20, 22-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891988706297090
Irle, E., Kessler, J., Markowitsch, H. & Gofmann, W. (1987). Primate learning tasks reveal strong impairments in patients with presenile or senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain and Cognition, 6, 429-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(87)90138-2
Kolev, V., Falkenstein, M. & Yordanova, J. (2006). Motor-response generation as a source of aging-related behavioural slowing in choice-reaction tasks. Neurobiolofy of Aging, 27, 1719-1730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.027
Levinoff, E., Saumier, D. & Chertkow, H. (2005). Focused attention deficits in patients with Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Brain and Cognition, 57, 127-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.058
López Pérez-Díaz, A.G., Calero, M.D. & y Navarro-González, E. (2013). Predicción del deterioro cognitivo en ancianos mediante el análisis del rendimiento en fluidez verbal y en atención sostenida. Revista de Neurología 56, 1-17.
Lustig, C., May, C. & Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130, 199-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.199
Mayeux, R. & Stern, Y. (2012). Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006239
McDowd, J. & Birren, J.E. (1990). Aging and attentional processes. In J.E. Birren & K.W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (p.p 63-71). New York: Academic Press.
McKhann, G.M., Knopman, D.S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B.T., Jack, C.R. Jr, Kawas, C.H., Klunk, W.E., Koroshetz, W.J., Manly, J.J., Mayeux, R., Mohs, R.C., Morris, J.C., Rossor, M.N., Scheltens, P., Carrillo, M.C., Thies, B., Weintraub, S. & Phelps, C.H. (2011). The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7, 263-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
Mora-Simon, S., García-García, R., Perea-Bartolome, M.V., Ladera-Fernández, V., Unzueta-Arce, J., Patino-Alonso, M.C. & Rodríguez-Sánchez, E. (2012). Mild cognitive impairment: early detection and new perspectives. Revista de Neurología 54, 303-310.
Morgan, K. (2004). Psychological aspects of aging. Psychiatry 3, 8-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mppsy.2007.09.004
Parasuraman, R. (1984).Sustained attention in detection and discrimination. In R. Parasuman & D. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention, Nueva York: Academic Press 243-272.
Perry, R.J. & Hodges, J.R. (1999). Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer´s disease. A critical review. Brain 122, 383-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.3.383
Petersen, R.C., Roberts, R.O., Knopman, D.S., Boeve, B.F., Geda, Y.E., Ivnik, R.J., Smith, G.E. & Jack C.R. Jr. (2009). Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Archives of Neurology 66, 1447-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.266
Roda, C. & Thomas, J. (2006). Attention aware systems: Theories, applications, and research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior 22, 557-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.005
Roth, M., Huppert, F., Tym, E. & Mountjoy, C. (1998). The Cambridge examination for mental disorders of the elderly – revised (CAMDEX-R). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salthouse, T. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403
Salthouse, T.A. & Ferrer-Caja, E. (2003). What needs to be explained to account for age related effects on multiple cognitive variables? Psychology and Aging, 18, 91-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.91
Salthouse, T.A., Toth, J.P, Hancock, H.E. & Woodard, J.L. (1997). Controlled and automatic forms of memory and attention: process purity and the uniqueness of age-related influences. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52, 216-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/52B.5.P216
Shilling, V., Chetwynd, A. & Rabbitt, P. (2002). Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: an investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults. Neuropsychologia 40, 605-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00157-9
Spies, P.E., Claasen J.A.H.R., Slats, D., Olde Rikkert, M.G.M., Verbeek, M.M. & Kessels R.P.C. (2010). Cerebrospinal fluid tau amyloid ? proteins do not correlate with cognitive functioning in cognitively impaired memory clinic patients. CNS Spectrums 15, 588-593.
Stevens, C. & Bavelier, D. (2011). The role of selective attention on academic foundations: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 15, 30-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.11.001
Tierney, M.C., Szalai. J.P., Dunn, E., Geslani, D. & McDowell, I. (2000). Prediction of probable Alzheimer disease in patients with symptoms suggestive of memory impairment. Value of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Archives of Family Medicine, 9, 527-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.6.527
Welford, A. T. (2001). Motor performance. In J.E. Birren J.E. & K.W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp. 450-496). San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
Wylie, S., Ridderinkhof, K., Eckerle, M. & Manning, C. (2007). Inefficient response inhibition in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsycologia, 45, 1408-1419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.