Sex differences in OF1 mice’s learning of the Hebb-Williams Maze

Authors

  • Cristina Caballero-Reinaldo Universitàt de Valencia Spain
  • Concepción Inmaculada Navarro-Francés Universitàt de Valencia Spain
  • María Carmen Arenas Universitàt de Valencia Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v10i2.13187

Keywords:

Hebb-Williams Maze, sex differences, mice, spatial learning

Abstract

The Hebb-Williams Maze is a test used to evaluate spa-tial learning in animals. Although sex differences in spatial ability have been observed in numerous species (males typically outperform females), inconclusive results have been obtained in the few studies that have used this test to assess male and female animals. This study investigated whether male OF1 mice performed better than OF1 mice on the Hebb-Williams Maze and whether any advantage was independent of the difficulty of the maze. We used a reduced version for mice, which consists of 5 mazes (3 easy and 2 difficult). In general, the results suggest that male mice performed better than female mice. The male mice showed shorter runtimes, a smaller number of errors, and fewer attempts to reach the criterion of acquisition. However, these sex differences were mainly found in the easy mazes but not in the difficult ones. We discuss the explanations for these differences in learning mazes based on their difficulty and conclude that the categorization of the difficulty of the mazes is sex-dependent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bertholet, L., Torres Escobar, M., Depré, M., Chavan, C.F., Giuliani, F., Gisquet-Verrier, P., Preiss-mann, D. y Schenk, F. (2015). Spatial radial maze procedures and setups to dissociate local and distal relational spatial frameworks in humans. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 253, 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.06.012

Bettis, T.J. y Jacobs, L.F. (2009). Sex-specific strategies in spatial orientation in C57BL/6J mice. Behavioural Processes, 82, 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.07.004

Chaia, X.J. y Jacobs, L.F. (2010). Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 208, 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.039

Duarte-Guterman, P., Yagi, S., Chow, C. y Galea, L.A.M. (2015). Hippocampal learning, memory, and neurogenesis: Effects of sex and estrogens across the lifespan in adults. Hormones and Behavior, 74, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.05.024

Galsworthy, M.J., Paya-Cano, J.L., Liu, L., Monleón, S., Gregoryan, G., Fernandes, C., Schalk-wyk, L.C. y Plomin, R. (2005). Assessing reliability, heritability and general cognitive ability in a battery of cognitive tasks for laboratory mice. Behavior Genetics, 35, 675-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3423-9

Hawley, W.R., Grissom, E.M., Barratt, H.E., Conrad, T.S. y Dohanich, G. P. (2012). The effects of biological sex and gonadal hormones on lea rning strategy in adult rats. Physiology & Behavior, 105, 1014-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.11.021

Hebb, D.O. y Williams, K. (1946). A Method of Rating Animal Intelligence. The Journal of General Psychology, 34, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1946.10544520

Hoplight, B.J., Boehm, G.W., Hyde, L.A., Deni, R. y Deneberg, V.H. (1996). A computer-aided procedure for measuring Hebb-Williams Maze performance. Physiology & Behavior, 60, 1171-1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(96)00213-2

Keeley, R.J., Bye, C., Trow, J. y McDonald, R.J., (2015). Strain and sex differences in brain and behaviour of adult rats: Learning and memory, anxiety and volumetric estimates. Behavioural Brain Research, 288, 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.10.039

Kimura, D. (2004). Sexo y capacidades mentales. Barcelona: A&M GRÀFIC, S.L.

Köpen, J.R., Blankenship, P.A., Blackwell, A.A., Winter, S.S., Stuebing, S.S., Matuszewich, L. y Wallace, D. G. (2015). Comparison of direction and distance estimation across spatial tasks: Absence of sexually dimorphic self-movement cues processing. Learning and Motivation, 51, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2015.03.001

Locklear, M.N., Kritzer, M.F. (2014). Assessment of the effects of sex and sex hormones on spatial cognition in adult rats using the Barnes maze. Hormones and Behavior, 66, 298–308. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.06.006

Mahmoud, R., Wainwright, S.R., Galea, L.A.M. (2016). Sex hormones and adult hippocampal neurogenesis: Regulation, implications, and potential mechanisms. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 41, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2016.03.002

Meunier, M., Saint-Marc, M. y Destrade, C. (1986). The HebbWilliams test to assess recovery of learning after limbic lesions in mice. Physiology & Behavior, 37, 909-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(86)80011-7

Monfort, P., Gomez-Gimenez, B., Llansola, M. y Felipo V. (2015). Gender differences in spatial learning, synaptic activity, and long-term potentiation in the hippocampus in rats: molecular mechanisms. ACS Chemical Neurosciencie, 6, 1420?1427. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneu-ro.5b00096

Peña, Y., Prunell, M., Rotllant, D., Armario, A. y Escorihuela R.M. (2009). Enduring effects of environmental enrichment from weaning to adulthood on pituitary-adrenal function, pre-pulse inhibition and learning in male and female rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 1390-1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.019

Postma, A., Jager, G., Kessels, R.P.C, Koppeschaar, H.P.F. y van Honka, J. (2004). Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory. Brain and Cognition, 54, 24-34. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00238-0

Pritchett, K. y Mulder, G. (2004) Hebb-Williams mazes. Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science, 43, 44-5.

Rabinovitch, M. S. y Rosvold, H.E. (1951). A closed-field intelligence test for rats. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 5, 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083542

Rodríguez, C.A., Torres, A., Mackintosh, N.J. y Chamizo, V.D. (2010). Sex Differences in the Strategies Used by Rats to Solve a Navigation Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017297

Sánchez-Sánchez, I., Sánchez-Marín, F.J. y Sin-Villagomez, R. (2011). Diferencias de género en la orientación espacial en un ambiente virtual. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 28, 211-216.

Shore, D.I., Stanford, L., MacInnes, W.J.., Raymon, M.K. y Brown, R.E. (2001). Of mice and men: Virtual Hebb–Williams mazes permit comparison of spatial learning across species. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.1.1.83

Spritzer, M. D., Fox, E.C., Larsen, G.D., Batson, C.G., Wagner, B.A. y Maher, J. (2013). Testos-terone influences spatial strategy preferences among adult male rats. Hormones and Behavior, 63, 800-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.03.018

Standford, L., y Brown, R.E., (2003). MHC-congenic mice (C57BL/6J and B6-H-2K) show differ-ences in speed but not accuracy in learning the Hebb-Williams Maze. Behavior Brain Research, 144, 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00093-7

Vidal-Infer, A., Aguilar, M.A., Miñarro, J. y Rodríguez-Arias, M. (2012). Effect intermittent expo-sure to ethanol and MDMA during adolescence on learning and memory in adult mice. Behavior and Brian Functions, 8, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-32

Wong-Carriera, A. y Álvarez-González, M.A. (2012). Hormonas, cerebro y conducta. Notas para la práctica de la Psicología en la Endocrinología. Revista Cubana de Endocrinología, 24, 1-11.

Published

2017-05-01

How to Cite

Caballero-Reinaldo, C., Navarro-Francés, C. I., & Arenas, M. C. (2017). Sex differences in OF1 mice’s learning of the Hebb-Williams Maze. Escritos De Psicología - Psychological Writings, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v10i2.13187

Issue

Section

Research Reports