Comparación de ciberacoso y autoeficacia en redes sociales: Ciudad de México y Estado de México.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v14i1.12688Keywords:
cyberbullying, self-efficacy, social networks, empathy, assertivenessAbstract
The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of cyberbullying, the type of responses to it, as well as knowledge and self-efficacy in the use of social networks in young people from Mexico City and the State of Mexico. The sample comprised 1673 students of both sexes between 14 and 20 years old (862 participants from Mexico City and 811 from the State of Mexico). We performed descriptive analyses and X2 tests. The results showed a significant difference between the frequency of cyberbullying and the level of young people's knowledge. The latter variable was higher in Mexico City than in the State of Mexico. However, participants from the State of Mexico scored higher than those from Mexico City in the way they respond to cyberbullying (assertive and empathetic) and in self-efficacy. More research on this issue is needed given the scarcity of statistics and information on this topic in Mexico
Downloads
Metrics
References
Arab, E. & Díaz, A. (2014). Impacto de las redes sociales e internet en la adolescencia: aspectos positivos y negativos. Revista médica clínica Los Condes, 26(1), 07-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2014.12.001
Briones, H. & Ortiz, D. (2014). Ciberbullying y su influencia en la asertividad. Tendencia en psicología, 1(1), 34-39.
Buelga, S., Iranzo B., Cava, M., & Torralba, E. (2015). Perfil psicosocial de adolescentes agresores de ciberbullying. 30(2), 382-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2015.1016754
Buelga, S., & Pons J. (2012). Agresiones entre adolescentes a través del teléfono móvil y de internet. Psychosocial Intervention, 21(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2012v21n1a2
Cardozo, G., Dubini, P., & Lorenzino, L. (2017). Bullying y ciberbullying: Un estudio comparativo con adolescentes escolarizados. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 34(2), 101-10
Corrales, A., Quijano, N. & Góngora, E. (2017). Empatía, comunicación asertiva y seguimiento de normas, un programa para desarrollar habilidades para la vida. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología 22(1), 58-65. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29251161005
Castellanos, C., Villa, G. & Gámez, G. (2016). Cyberbullying: Un problema de salud mental entre adolescentes mexicanos. Vertientes Revista especializada en ciencias de la salud. 19(1), 5-12.
Espelage, D. & Hung J. (2016) Cyberbullying prevention and intervention efforts: current knowledge and future directions. Canadian journal of psychiatry,62(6), 374-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716684793
Espinar, E. & González, M.J. (2009). Jóvenes en las redes sociales virtuales. Un análisis exploratorio de las diferencias de género. Feminismo/s, (14), 87-106. https://doi:10.14198/fem.2009.14.06
Finkelhor, D., Jones, L., & Mitchell, K. (2021). Teaching privacy: A flawed strategy for children’s online safety. Child Abuse & Neglect, 117, 105064. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105064
Garaigordobil, M. (2017). Conducta antisocial: conexión con bullying / cyberbullying y estrategias de resolución de conflictos. Psychosocial Intervention, 26(1), 47-54. https://doi:10.1016/j.psi.2015.12.002
Garaigordobil, M. & Aliri, J. (2013). Ciberacoso (“Cyberbullying”) en el país Vasco: diferencias de sexo en víctimas, agresores y observadores. Psicología conductual, 21(3), 461-474.
García-Maldonado, G., Joffre-Velázquez, V. M., Martínez-Salazar, G. J., & Llanes-Castillo, A. (2011). Ciberbullying: forma virtual de intimidación escolar. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 40(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60108-6
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P.(2010). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill
Instituto de la Juventud de la Ciudad de México. (2018). Encuesta de tendencias juveniles. [Conjunto de datos] https://www.injuve.CiudaddeMéxico.gob.mx/storage/app/uploads/public/5c8/eab/e5b/5c8eabe5b9ef297714358.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2017). Módulo sobre ciberacoso MOCIBA.[Conjunto de datos]. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/mociba/2017/
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2018). Encuesta Nacional sobre Disponibilidad y Uso de Tecnologías de la Información en los Hogares. [Conjunto de datos] https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/dutih/2018/
Lee, W.Y., Tan, C., & Siah, P.(2017). The role of online privacy concern as a mediator between internet self-efficacy and online technical protection privacy behavior. Sains Humanika, 9(3), 37-43. https://doi:10.11113/sh.v9n3-2.1271
Li, Q. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of adolescents experience related to cyberbullying. Educational Research, 50, 223-234. https://doi:10.1080/00131880802309333
Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M. & Kelly, A. (2016) Cyberbullying: incidence, trends and consequences. En: (Comp.) Ending the Torment: Tackling Bullying from the Schoolyard to Cyberspace. (pp. 115-120). New York: United Nations Publications.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Results from PISA 2015 students’ well-being. [Conjunto de datos]. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA2015-Students-Well-being-Country-note-Mexico.pdf.
Oliveros, M., Amemiya, I., Condorimay, Y., Oliveros, R., Barrientos, A., & Rivas, B. (2012). Ciberbullying-Nueva tecnología electrónica al servicio del acoso escolar en alumnos de dos distritos de Lima, Perú. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina, 73(1),13-18. https://doi:10.15381/anales.v73i1.804
Patchin J. & Hinduja S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 4(2), 148-169. https://doi:10.1177/1541204006286288
Prieto, M. & Carrillo J. (2015). Violencia virtual y acoso escolar entre estudiantes universitarios: el lado oscuro de las redes sociales. Revista Innovación Educativa, 15(68), 33-47.
Tejada, E., Castaño, C. & Romero, A. (2019). Los hábitos de uso en las redes sociales de los preadolescente. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 22(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.23245
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
10.png)
ESCRITOS DE PSICOLOGÍA por 