Moral reasoning among Systems Engineering students: ethical conflicts over Information Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v13i2.12410Keywords:
Moral reasoning, Information Technology, EthicsAbstract
This study investigated the relationship between the processes of moral reasoning (emotional and rational) and the way ethical conflicts were solved in relation to Information Technology (IT). To this end, a sample of 177 Systems Engineering students (83% men, 17% women) aged 17 to 26 years completed the 'Ethical IT Survey' and a questionnaire to measure moral reasoning. The results show differences in the scores obtained for the four categories of scenarios analyzed, placing the responses to the topics of Privacy and Property in the ethically questionable category and those of Precision and Accessibility within the unethical category. The dominant type of reasoning was emotional. Furthermore, more than half of the participants reported having engaged in unethical behavior regarding the categories of Property and Accessibility, suggesting a discrepancy between the cognitive appreciation of the ethical conflict and engaging in behaviors related to these issues. In conclusion, we suggest that the training of such students should emphasize the relevance of ethics regarding IT-related issues.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Brown, K. C. (2018). A consideration of Mason’s ethical framework. The importance of PAPA factors in the 21st century: A seven-year study. UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations.
Bucciarelli, M., Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. (2008). The psychology of moral reasoning. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 121-139.
Dubé, J. É. (2008). Evaluación del acuerdo interjueces en investigacion clinica. Breve introducción a la confiabilidad interjueces. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 17, 75-80.
Evans, J. S., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
Greene, J. D. (2007). The secret joke of Kant's soul. En W. Sinnott-Armstrong, Moral Psychology (Vols. 3): The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Disease, and Development , págs. 35-116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Greene, J. D. (2014a). Beyond point-and-shoot morality: Why cognitive (neuro)science matters for ethics. Ethics, 124, 695-726. https://doi.org/10.1086/675875
Greene, J. D. (2014b). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment and decision making. En M. Gazzaniga, & G. Mangun, The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1013-1023). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Greene, J. D. (2015). The rise of moral cognition. Cognition, 135, 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.018
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgement. Neuron, 44, 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
Harris, A. (2017). Ethical IT Survey.
Harris, A., Yang, M., Yates, D., & Kruck, S. (2011). Incorporating ethics and social responsibility in IS education . Journal of Information Systems Education 22, 183-189.
Hersh, R. H., Reimer, J., & Paolitto, D. P. (2002). El crecimiento moral de Piaget a Kohlberg. Madrid: Narcea S. A.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive devolpmental approach. En R. a. Holt, Moral devolpment and behavior: theory, research and social issues (págs. 34-35). Nueva York: S.E.
Martin, N. L., & Woodward, B. (2011). Computer ethics of american and european Information Technology students: a cross-cultural comparison. Issues in Information Systems, 12, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.48009/1_iis_2011_78-87
Mason, R. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 10, 5-12.
Ming, T. M., Jabar, M. A., Sidi, F., & Wei, K. T. (2015). A systematic literature review of computer ethics issues. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 78, 360-372.
Peslak, A. R. (2006). PAPA revisited: A current empirical study of the Mason framework. Journal of Computer Information Systems 46, 117-123.
Piaget, J. (1935). El juicio moral en el niño. Madrid: Beltrán.
Reynolds, G. W. (2014). Ethics in Information Technology. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Schultz, R. A. (2006). Contemporary issues in ethics and Information Technology. London: IRM Press.
Stahl, B. C., & Rogers, S. (2013). Ethical issues of emerging ICT applications — A Euro-Landscape. En J. Weckert, R. Lucas, & M. J. Selgelid, Professionalism in the Information and Communication Technology Industry (pp. 321-341). ANU Press.
Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Flick, C. (2017). Ethics of emerging Information and Communication Technologies. Science and Public Policy, 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw069
Sullins, J. (2018). Information Technology and moral values. (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Obtenido de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/it-moral-values/
Woodward, B., Martin, N., & Imboden, T. (2011). Expansion and validation of the PAPA framework. Information Systems Education Journal (ISEDJ), 9, 28-34.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.