The rehabilitation of the personafter Wittgenstein and Apel,in Anscombre and Llano.Through of Aristotle or Frege again?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v24i2.6862Keywords:
INTENCIONALITY, PRACTICAL SYLLOGISM, THEORY OF MEANING, FORMAL SINGAbstract
Anscombe and Llano tried to define the formal constitutive of the person based on the proposals of Wittgenstein or of him jointly with Apel. However, they first had to avoid the paradoxes that originated then, either by recovering the notion of the interpreting subject from the corresponding Aristotelian syllogism, or by revising the use that Wittgenstein and Apel had made of their respective Fregean theories of meaning. In any case Anscombe would define the person as an intentional «sign interpreter» of herself, while Llano would add that it is specifically a «formal sign» of an intentional nature.Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All content published in Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license whose full text can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or repository in open access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial Service of the University of Malaga (Uma Editorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
5.png)
