Dronetics and responsible drone design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v27i2.12820Keywords:
Drones, ethics, responsability, innovation, democracyAbstract
Research in technology for military purposes has deepened in recent decades due to the development of artificial intelligence, as can be seen in drones or unmanned aerial vehicles. The deployment of these artifacts on the battlefield is raising significant ethical issues and controversies. In this sense, the purpose of this work revolves around the need to propose an ethical reflection on the design and purpose of drones from the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) model, with the aim of redirecting their use towards humanitarian purposes and civic.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ARKIN, R. C. 2008: Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture. U.S. Army Research Office. Disponible en: https://www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/formalizationv35.pdf.
BAUM, S. D. 2017, «Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence», AI and Society, 35, pp. 1-12.
CHAMAYOU, G. 2016: Teoría del dron: nuevos paradigmas de los conflictos del siglo XXI. Madrid: Nuevos emprendimientos.
COKER, C. 2015: Future War. Cambridge: Polity.
COECKELBERGH, M. (2011), «From Killer Machines to Doctrines and Swarms, or Why Ethics of Military Robotics Is not (Necessarily) About Robots», Philosophy & Technology, 24, pp. 269–278.
COMISIÓN EUROPEA 2014: Horizon 2020. El Programa Marco de Investigación e Innovación de la Unión Europea. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea. Disponible en: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/H2020_ES_KI0213413ESN.pdf.
DE SWARTE, T., BOUFOUS, O. y ESCALLE, P. (2019), «Artificial intelligence, ethics and human values: the cases of military drones and companion robots», Artificial Life and Robotics, 1, pp. 1-6.
FLYVBJERG, B. 2001: Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FLYVBJERG, B. (2004), «Cinco malentendidos acerca de la investigación mediante los estudios de caso», Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 106 (4), pp. 33-62.
FLYVBJERG, B. (2006ª), «Social Science That Matters», Foresight Europe, 2, pp. 38-42.
FLYVBJERG, B. (2006b), «Making Organization Research Matter: Power, Values, and Phronesis», en S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence y W. R. Nord (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. CA: Thousand Oaks, pp. 370-387.
FORESTER, J. 1993: Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
FORESTER, J. 1999: The Deliberative Practitioner. Cambridge: MIT Press.
FRIEDMAN, B., KAHN, P., BORNING, A. y ZHANG, P. (2006), «Value sensitive design and information systems», en D. Galletta & P. Zhang (eds.), Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Applications. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
GRUNWALD, A. (2014), «Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation», en J. Van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B.-J. Koops y H. Jomijn (eds.), Responsible Innovation 1: Innovate Solutions for Global Issues. New York: Springer, pp. 15-31.
HABERMAS, J. 2010: Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Madrid: Trotta.
HUMANITARIAN UAV NETWORK 2014: UAV Code of Conduct : Humanitarian UAV Code of Conduct. Disponible en: https://uavcode.org/
JOHNSON, D. (2007), «Ethics and technology ‘‘in the Making’’: An essay on the challenge of nanoethics», NanoEthics. 1(1), pp. 21–30.
JOHNSON, D. (2011), «Software agents, anticipatory ethics, and accountability», en G. E. Marchant, B. R. Allenby y J. R. Herkert (eds.), The growing gap between emerging technologies and legalethical oversight.Netherlands: Springer, pp. 61-76.
KNOBEL, C. y BOWKER, G. (2011), «Values in design», Communications of the ACM, 54(7), pp. 26–28.
MEICHES, B. (2019), «Non-human humanitarians», Review of International Studies, 45(1), pp. 1-19.
MANJIKIAN, M. 2017: A Typology of Arguments about Drone Ethics. Carlisle, PA Strategic Studies Institute.
MUÑOZ-ALONSO LÓPEZ, G. (1997), «La evaluación de tecnologías (ET): origen y desarrollo», Revista General de Información y Documentación, 7(1), pp. 15-30.
MÜLLER, J. 1996: The Design of Intelligent Agents: A Layered Approach. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
LÉVY-LEBLOND, J. 1975: La ideología de/en la física contemporánea y otros ensayos. Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama.
LUTERBACHER, C. 2018: How drones are transforming humanitarian aid. Swissinfo.ch. Disponible en: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/sci-tech/-dronefrontier_how-drones-are-transforming-humanitarian-aid/44141254.
ROYAKKERS, L. y TOPOLSKI, A. (2014), «Military Robotics & Relationality: Criteria for Ethical Decision-Making», en J. van den Hoven et al (eds.), Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues. New York: Springer, pp. 351-368.
SHILTON, K. (2014), «Anticipatory Ethics for a Future Internet: Analyzing Values During the Design of an Internet Infrastructure», Sci Eng Ethics, 21, pp. 1-18.
SINGER, P. W. 2009a: Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and 21st Century Conflict. United States: Penguin.
SINGER, P. W. (2009b), «Wired for war? Robots and military doctrine», Joint Force Quarterly, 52, pp. 105–110.
SMIRL, L. 2015: Spaces of Aid: How Cars, Compounds and Hotels Shape Humanitarianism. London: Zed Books.
SPARROW, R. (2007), «Killer robots», Journal of Applied Philosophy. 24(1), pp. 62–77.
SPARROW, R. (2009), «Building a better WarBot: ethical issues in the design of unmanned systems for military applications», Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, pp. 169–187.
STILGOE, J., OWEN, R. y MACNAGHTEN, P. (2013), «Developing a framework for responsible innvation», Research Policy, 42, pp. 1568-1580.
TERRONES RODRÍGUEZ, A. L. (2021), «Inteligencia artificial y ciencia cívica», Revista de Filosofía Aurora, 32(57), pp. 827-847.
VON SCHOMBERG, R. (2011), «Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation», en M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft (eds), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden. Wiesbaden: Vs Verlag, pp. 39-61.
WELD, D. y ETZIONI, O. (2009), «The first law of robotics (A Call to Arms)», en M. Barley, H. Mouratidis, A. Unruh, D. Spears, P. Scerri y F. Massacci (eds.), Safety and Security in Multiagent Systems. New York: Springer, pp. 90-100.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All content published in Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license whose full text can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or repository in open access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial Service of the University of Malaga (Uma Editorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
5.png)
