Sobre la posibilidad y necesidad de la Filosofía de la Naturaleza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v0i0.1181Abstract
RESUMEN
En este trabajo se analiza y se defiende la posibilidad de una Filosofía de la Naturaleza como disciplina distinta de la Filosofía de la Ciencia y de la Historia de la Ciencia. Para ello se discuten cuatro posiciones que han sido relevantes en este asunto: la positivista, la aristotélica, la bergsoniana y la kantiana.
PALABRAS CLAVE
FILOSOFÍA DE LA NATURALEZA, NATURALEZA, POSITIVISMO, ARISTÓTELES, KANT, BERGSON
ABSTRACT
This paper analyzes and defends the possibility of a Philosophy of Nature as a discipline independent of the Philosophy of Science and the History of Science. For this purpose, four relevant historical position about this topic are discussed: positivism, Aristotle’s, Bergson’s and Kant’s positions.
KEYWORDS
PHILOSOPHY OF NATURE, NATURE, POSITIVISM, ARISTOTLE, KANT, BERGSON
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All content published in Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license whose full text can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or repository in open access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial Service of the University of Malaga (Uma Editorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.