Influence of demographic aspects on human technological complexity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v26i3.10663Keywords:
Behavioral modernity, Technological complexity, Demography, Demographic modelsAbstract
The lag between the appearance of Homo sapiens and the consolidation of behaviorally modern traits among human populations raises the problem of what is the factor, or factors, that explain this consolidation in a particular moment of our history: the transition between MSA/MP and LSA/UP. This paper examines several of the proposals that have tried to identify the cause of this cultural change, especially those that relate the degree of technological complexity reached by a population with its demographic characteristics.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ANDERSSON, C. y READ, D., 2016. «The evolution of cultural complexity: Not by the treadmill alone». Current Anthropology, 57(3), 261-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686317
AOKI, K., 2019. «Cultural bistability and connectedness in a subdivided population». Theoretical Population Biology. 129, 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2019.03.009
COHEN, M., 1985. «Prehistoric hunter-gatherers: the meaning of social complexity». En T. D. Price y J. A. Brown, (eds.), Prehistoric hunter-gatherers: the emergence of cultural complexity. Waltham, MA: Academic Press, pp. 99-119.
COLLARD, M., KEMERY, M. y BANKS, S., 2005. «Causes of Toolkit Variation Among Hunter-Gatherers: A Test of Four Competing Hypotheses». Canadian Journal of Archaeology / Journal Canadien D'Archéologie, 29(1), 1-19.
COLLARD, M., VAESEN, K., COSGROVE, R. y ROEBROEKS, W., 2016. «The empirical case against the “demographic turn” in Palaeolithic archaeology». Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150242. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0242
COOLIDGE, F. y WYNN, T., 2001. «Executive Functions of the Frontal Lobes and the Evolutionary Ascendancy of Homo Sapiens». Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774301000142
D'ERRICO, F. y STRINGER, C. B., 2011. «Evolution, revolution or saltation scenario for the emergence of modern cultures?». Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 366(1567), 1060-1069. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0340
DIAMOND, J., 1978. «The Tasmanians: the longest isolation, the simplest technology». Nature, 273, 185-186.
FOGARTY, L., WAKANO, J., FELDMAN, M. y AOKI, K., 2016. «The Driving Forces of Cultural Complexity: Neanderthals, Modern Humans, and the Question of Population Size». Human Nature. 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9275-6
FOLEY, R., 2006. «The emergence of culture in the context of hominin evolutionary patterns». En S. Levinson y P. Jaisson (eds.), Evolution and Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 53-77.
FOLEY, R. y LAHR, M., 1997. «Mode 3 Technologies and the Evolution of Modern Humans». Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 7(1), 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001451
HAIDLE, M. N., 2016. «Lessons from Tasmania - Cultural Performance Versus Cultural Capacity». En M. Haidle, N. Conard y M. Bolus (eds.), The Nature of Culture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7426-0_2
HENRICH, J., 2004. «Demography and cultural evolution: how adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: the Tasmanian case». American Antiquity 69, 197-214. https://doi.org/10.2307/4128416
HENRICH, J., 2006. «Understanding cultural evolutionary models: a reply to Read’s critique». American Antiquity, 71(4), 771-782. https://doi.org/10.2307/40035890
HENRICH, J., BOYD, R., DEREX, M., KLINE, M., MESOUDI, A., MUTHUKRISHNA, M., POWELL, A., SHENNAN, S. y THOMAS, M., 2016. «Understanding cumulative cultural evolution». Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2016, 113 (44), E6724-E6725. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610005113
JONES, R., 1995. «Tasmanian Archaeology: Establishing the Sequence». Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 423-446
KEMPE, M., y MESOUDI, A., 2014. «An experimental demonstration of the effect of group size on cultural accumulation». Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(4), 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.02.009
KLEIN, R., 2001. «Southern Africa and Modern Human Origins». Journal of Anthropological Research, 57, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.57.1.3630795
KLEIN, R., 2009. The human career: human biological and cultural origins. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
KLEIN, R., 2019. «Population structure and the evolution of Homo sapiens in Africa». Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 28. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21788
KLINE, M. A. y BOYD, R., 2010. «Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania». Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2559-2564. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0452
KNIGHT, C., POWER, C. y WATTS, I., 1995. «The human symbolic revolution: a Darwinian account». Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 5(1), 75-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001190
KOBAYASHI, Y. y AOKI, K., 2012. «Innovativeness, population size and cumulative cultural evolution». Theoretical population biology, 82(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2012.04.001
KOBAYASHI, Y., OHTSUKI, H., y WAKANO, J. Y., 2016. «Population size vs. social connectedness - A gene-culture coevolutionary approach to cumulative cultural evolution». Theoretical population biology, 111, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2016.07.001
KUHN, S. y STINER, M., 2007. «Paleolithic ornaments: implications for cognition, demography and identity». Diogenes, 54, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192107076870
KUHN, S., STINER, M., REESE, D. S., y GÜLEÇ, E., 2001. «Ornaments of the earliest Upper Paleolithic: New insights from the Levant». Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(13), 7641-7646. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.121590798
MCBREARTY, S., y BROOKS, A. S., 2000. «The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior». Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 453-563. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2000.0435
MELLARS, P., 2005. «The impossible coincidence: A single-species model for the origins of modern human behavior in Europe». Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20037
MELLARS P., 2007. «Rethinking the human revolution: Eurasian and African perspectives». En P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef y C. Stringer (eds.), Rethinking the Human Revolution. Cambridge: MacDonald Institute, pp. 1-14.
MITHEN, S., 1996. The Prehistory of Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art, Religion and Science. London: Thames & Hudson.
NOWELL, A., 2010. «Defining Behavioral Modernity in the Context of Neandertal and Anatomically Modern Human Populations». Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 437-52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105113
OFEK, H., 2001. Second Nature: Economic Origins of Human Evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
OSWALT, W. H., 1987. «Technological complexity: the Polar Eskimos and the Tareumiut». Arctic Anthropology, 24, 82-98.
POWELL, A., SHENNAN, S. y THOMAS, M. G., 2009. «Late pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior». Science 324, 1298-1301. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170165
POWELL, A., SHENNAN, S. y THOMAS, M. G., 2010. «Demography and variation in the accumulation of culturally inherited skills». En M. J. O’Brien y S. J. Shennan (eds.), Innovation in Cultural Systems. Contributions from Evolutionary Anthropology, MIT Press, London, pp. 137-160.
QUERBES, A., VAESEN, K., y HOUKES, W. N., 2014. «Complexity and demographic explanations of cumulative culture». PLoS ONE, 9(7), e102543-1/9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102543
READ, D., 2006. «Tasmanian knowledge and skill: maladaptive imitation or adequate technology?». American Antiquity, 71, 164-184. https://doi.org/10.2307/40035327
READ, D., 2009. «The misuse of a mathematical model: the Tasmanian case (reply to Henrich’s response)». UCLA: Human Complex Systems. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2805822
READ, D., y LEBLANC, S. A., 2003. «Population Growth, Carrying Capacity, and Conflict». Current Anthropology, 44, 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1086/344616
RICHERSON, P. J., 2013. «Group size determines cultural complexity». Nature, 503, 351-352.
RICHERSON, P., BOYD, R. y BETTINGER, R., 2009. «Cultural Innovations and Demographic Change». Human biology, 81, 211-35. https://doi.org/10.3378/027.081.0306
SHENNAN, S., 2001. «Demography and cultural innovation: a model and its implications for the emergence of modern human culture». Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11(01), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774301000014
SHENNAN, S., 2015. «Demography and Cultural Evolution». En R.A. Scott y S.M. Kosslyn (eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-14.
SOLLAS, W. J., 1911. Ancient Hunters and their modern representatives. London: Macmillan.
STERELNY, K., 2020. «Demography and cultural complexity». Synthese, 1-24.
STRAUS, L. G., 2009. «Has the notion of ‘transitions’ in Paleolithic prehistory outlived its usefulness? The European record in wider context». En M. Camps y P. Chauhan (eds.), Sourcebook of Paleolithic Transitions. New York: Springer, pp. 3-18.
VAESEN, K., COLLARD, M., COSGROVE, R., y ROEBROEKS, W., 2016. «Population size does not explain past changes in cultural complexity». Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(16), e2241-e2247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520288113
ZILHÃO, J., 2007. «The Emergence of Ornaments and Art: An Archaeological Perspective on the Origins of “Behavioral Modernity”». Journal of Archaeological Research, 15, 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-006-9008-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All content published in Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license whose full text can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or repository in open access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial Service of the University of Malaga (Uma Editorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.