Usus adversus doctrinam? Grammatica in schola alterius linguae. Grammatica latine tradita

Autores/as

  • María Luisa Aguilar García España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/thamyristhrdcc.v10i16524

Palabras clave:

Comparatio linguarum, intentio in formam, copia linguae data, cognitio de lingua, cognitio linguae, ratio studiorum

Resumen

Finis, meta, scopus praecipuus scholae linguae Latinae eo hactenus singulariter spectavit, ut essent discipuli non solum rei grammaticae conscii sed bene periti atque in ea exercitati. Huc voluntas, huc iudicium et ratio intendebant, primum legum institutionis, deinde ipsorum praeceptorum. Nunc autem novi sunt termini constituti ad usum linguae simul quam ad formam eius pertinentes, prioribus illis consiliis grammaticis non omissis, immo adstantibus et constantibus. In hoc igitur praeceptores periclitantur, ut tempus, ut attentio discentium, ut exercitamenta scholarum distribuant et disponant, ut denique cuique, grammaticae et usui, suum dent. Quo prorsus hanc symbolam referam: post exemplum antiquorum primum illatum, ex quo praesagitur iam doctrina grammaticae et usus linguae quam dissimiliter in comparatione linguarum valeant, hoc primum monstrabitur, quae et quales sint beneficia —vel cognitiones— quae ex utraque re —grammatica atque usu— comparari possunt; id deinde attingetur, doctrina et usus ad curricula studiorum, quae nunc sunt, quatenus conveniant et accommodentur; illud postremo praebebitur, ut praeceptores utramque rem et grammaticam et usum in unum componant et coniungant emolumento discentium, tribus exemplis allatis exercitationum instar. 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Alcalde-Diosdado, A. (2000), “La necesidad de renovación didáctica de las lenguas clásicas. Una nueva propuesta metodológica”, Estudios Clásicos 118, 95-131.

Amarante, J. (2013), “O profesor e o método: papéis, diálogos e dilemas”, Estudos linguísticos e litérarios 48, 62-90.

Benati, A. (2016), “Input manipulation, enhancement and processing: theoretical views and empirical research”, Studies in second language learning and teaching 6, 65-88.

Carbonell, S. (2010), “La crisis del griego antiguo y los métodos antidepresivos”, Estudios Clásicos 137, 85-95.

Carlon, J. (2013), “The implications of SLA research for latin pedagogy: modernizing latin instruction and securing its place in Curricula”, Teaching Classical Languages 4/2, 106-122.

Dekeyser, R. (2007), “Skill acquisition theory”, apud B. Van Patten et J. Williams (coord.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. An introduction, Routledge, New York, 97-113.

Ellis, R. (2002), “Grammar teaching: practice or concioussness raising?”, apud J. Richards et W. Renandya (coord.), Methodology in language teaching, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 167-174.

Ellis, R. (2005), La adquisición de segundas lenguas en un contexto de enseñanza. Análisis de las investigaciones existentes, trans. a G. Abio, J. Sánchez et A. Yagüe, Ministry of Education, New Zealand.

Ellis, R. (2009), Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching, Channel View Publications, Bristol.

Ellis, R. (2014), “Grammar Teaching for Language Learning”, Babylonia: the journal of language teaching and learning 2, 210-14.

Ellis, R. et Natsuko, S. (2014), Exploring language pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition research, Routledge, London.

Gass, S. et Selinker, L., Second Language Acquisition: an introductory course, Routledge, New York.

Krashen, S. (1982), Principles and practice in second language acquisition, Pergamon, New York.

Llopis, R. (2007), “Procesamiento del input y mejora en el output para el aprendizaje de segundas lenguas”, Revista Nebrija 1, 100-123.

Neupanne, M. (2009), “Processing Instruction: An Input Based Approach for Teaching Grammar”, Journal of Nelta 14 (1-2), 111-118.

Omaggio-Hadley, A. (2000), Teaching language in context, Heinle & Heinle, Boston.

Ortega, L. (2013), Understanding second language acquisition, Routledge, Boston-New York.

Patrick, R. (2011), “Latin is not diff erent” (orantiuncula habita in conventu SALVI Board Summit: <http://www.latin.org/resources/documents/Latin%20is%20Not%20Diff erent%20[Patrick%202011].pdf>.

Pienemann, M. (2007), “Processability theory”, apud B. Van Patten et J. Williams (coord.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. An introduction, Routledge, New York, 137-154.

Taylor, D. J. (1974), Declinatio: a study of the linguistic theory of Marcus Terentius Varro. Jonh Benjamin Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

Van Patten, B. et Benati, A. (2015), Key Terms in Second Language Acquisition, Bloomsbury, New York.

Descargas

Publicado

2023-04-02

Número

Sección

Artículos