La práctica aleatoria frente a la enseñanza sin errores en el aprendizaje del putt de golf en adolescentes

Autores/as

  • Juan Gavala González Universidad de Sevilla España
  • Blanca Román Alconchel Departamento de Educación Física. Colegio Ave María, Granada (España), España
  • Mª Teresa Miranda León Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Granada España
  • José Carlos Fernández García Departamento de Didáctica de las Lenguas, las Artes y el Deporte. Universidad de Málaga. España https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2308-2865

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.12.3.2023.17895

Palabras clave:

reducción error, variabilidad, golf, Educación Física, adolescentes
Agencias: no

Resumen

El aprendizaje del putt de golf ha sido objeto de múltiples estudios, si bien en la franja de edad de la adolescencia apenas hay referencias de cómo plantear un proceso de aprendizaje que tenga el gradiente de desafío y la dificultad adecuada en contextos de aprendizaje en Educación Física (EF). Purpose: El objetivo de este estudio es investigar mediante una aproximación ecológica, si la práctica aleatoria (variabilidad) permite el aprendizaje del putt de golf en la iniciación deportiva al igual que el aprendizaje sin errores (repetitivo). Método: Han participado 46 estudiantes (M=13.8±.07años) de segundo curso de la enseñanza secundaria obligatoria (ESO), sin ninguna experiencia previa en este deporte. Se han tomado varias mediciones: a) pretest, b) tratamiento, consistente en siete bloques de práctica de 10 repeticiones, c) post-test y d) test de transferencia (dos semanas después del post-test). Resultados: Los datos nos indican que tanto el grupo de aprendizaje aleatorio (variabilidad) como el grupo de aprendizaje sin errores consiguen resultados parecidos tanto en el post-test (M=1,36, SD=0,32 vs M=

1,16 SD=0,30), como en el test de transferencia (M=2,56, SD=0,07 vs M=2,53, SD= 0,07). Conclusión: El aprendizaje de un gesto técnico tan complejo como es el putt de golf puede plantearse en estas edades y en la fase de iniciación tanto desde la variabilidad de la práctica como mediante la reducción del error y con una manifestación del nivel de aprendizaje parecido a corto y largo plazo.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Aiken CA, Genter AM. The effects of blocked and random practice on the learning of three variations of the golf chip shot. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18: 339–349. doi:10.1080/24748668.2018.1475199

Guadagnoll MA, Lee TD. Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36: 212–224. doi:10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224

Conde-pipó J, Fernández-aguilera M. Propuesta metodológica de iniciación al esquí alpino escolar mediante esquís cortos Methodological proposal of initiation to alpine skiing in school children through short skis Introducción El esquí alpino es un deporte de naturaleza que se practica en la.

Duijn T van, Thomas S, Masters RSW. Chipping in on the role of conscious processing during children’s motor learning by analogy. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2019;14: 383–392. doi:10.1177/1747954119841162

Chow JY, Renshaw I, Button C. SN RD RIB. 2013.

Kleynen M, Braun SM, Rasquin SMC, Bleijlevens MHC, Lexis MAS, Halfens J, et al. Multidisciplinary Views on Applying Explicit and Implicit Motor Learning in Practice: An International Survey. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0135522. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135522

Richardson AK, Mitchell ACS, Hughes G. The effect of movement variability on putting proficiency during the golf putting stroke. Int J Sport Sci Coach. 2018;13: 590–597. doi:10.1177/1747954118768234

Keogh JWL, Hume PA. Evidence for biomechanics and motor learning research improving golf performance. Sports Biomechanics. 2012. doi:10.1080/14763141.2012.671354

Kamp G. van der J, Duivenvoorden J, Kok M, Hilvoorde I van. Motor Skill Learning in Groups: Some Proposals for Applying Implicit Learning and Self-Controlled Feedback. [Aprendizaje de habilidades/destrezas motoras en grupos: Propuestas para la Aplicación de Aprendizaje Implícito, autocontrolado y retroalimentado]. RICYDE Rev Int ciencias del Deport. 2015;11: 33–47. doi:10.5232/ricyde2015.03903

Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Kerr E, Weedon E. The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A Hum Exp Psychol. 2001;54: 1049–1068. doi:10.1080/713756014

Capio CM, Poolton JM, Sit CHP, Holmstrom M, Masters RSW. Reducing errors benefits the field-based learning of a fundamental movement skill in children. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2013;23: 181–188. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01368.x

Lee MCY, Chow JY, Komar J, Tan CWK, Button C. Nonlinear pedagogy: An effective approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill. PLoS One. 2014;9: e104744. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104744

Camacho Lazarraga P, Calvo Lluch Á. Estrategia de enseñanza sin errores para el aprendizaje de las habilidades deportivas. Una revisión sistemática. Sport Sci J Sch Sport Phys Educ Psychomot. 2017;3: 621. doi:10.17979/sportis.2017.3.3.2021

Capio CM, Sit CHP, Eguia KF, Abernethy B, Masters RSW. Fundamental movement skills training to promote physical activity in children with and without disability: A pilot study. J Sport Health Sci. 2015;4: 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2014.08.001

Buszard T, Farrow D, Verswijveren SJJM, Reid M, Williams J, Polman R, et al. Working memory capacity limits motor learning when implementing multiple instructions. Front Psychol. 2017;8: 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01350

Lopes MC, Albuquerque MR, Raab M. Effects of implicit, explicit and sequential learning in the acquisition of the basketball shooting skill in novices. J Phys Educ. 2018;29: 1–11. doi:10.4025/jphyseduc.v29i1.2964

Maxwell JP, Capio CM, Masters RSW. Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17: 407–416. doi:10.1080/17461391.2016.1268211

Brocken JEA, Kal EC, van der Kamp J. Focus of Attention in Children’s Motor Learning: Examining the Role of Age and Working Memory. J Mot Behav. 2016;48: 527–534. doi:10.1080/00222895.2016.1152224

Abswoude F Van, Nuijen NB, Kamp J Van Der. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport Individual Differences Influencing Immediate Effects of Internal and External Focus Instructions on Children ’ s Motor Performance Individual Differences Influencing Immediate Effects of Internal and External. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018;89: 190–199. doi:10.1080/02701367.2018.1442915

Kal EC, Van Der Kamp J, Houdijk H. External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: A comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis. Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32: 527–539. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2013.04.001

Ruiz-Amengual A, Ruiz-Pérez LM. Práctica aleatoria y aprendizaje deportivo-motor. Rev Iberoam Psicol del Ejerc y el Deport. 2014;9: 123–142.

Porter JM, Magill RA. Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial for learning sport skills. J Sports Sci. 2010;28: 1277–1285. doi:10.1080/02640414.2010.502946

Chua LK, Dimapilis MK, Iwatsuki T, Abdollahipour R, Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Practice variability promotes an external focus of attention and enhances motor skill learning. Hum Mov Sci. 2019;64: 307–319. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.015

Barreiros J, Figueiredo T, Godinho M. The contextual interference effect in applied settings. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2007;13: 195–208. doi:10.1177/1356336X07076876

Goodwin JE, Meeuwsen H. B, b, . . . 1996; 735–743.

Guadagnoli MA, Holcomb WR, Weber TJ. The relationship between contextual interference effects and performer expertise on the learning of a putting task. J Hum Mov Stud. 1999;37: 19–36.

Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for Ethics in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2018 Update. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38: 1126–1131. doi:10.1055/s-0043-124001

Review C, Communication S, Principles G. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81: 14–18. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199241323.003.0025

Barnett LM, Hardy LL, Brian AS, Robertson S. The development and validation of a golf swing and putt skill assessment for children. J Sports Sci Med. 2015;14: 147–54.

Robertson S, Burnett AF, Gupta R. Two tests of approach-iron golf skill and their ability to predict tournament performance. J Sports Sci. 2014. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.893370

Porter JM, Landin D, Hebert EP, Baum B. The Effects of Three Levels of Contextual Interference on Performance Outcomes and Movement Patterns in Golf Skills. Int J Sport Sci Coach. 2009;2: 243–255. doi:10.1260/174795407782233100

Zhu FF, Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW. Neural co-activation as a yardstick of implicit motor learning and the propensity for conscious control of movement. Biol Psychol. 2011;87: 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.004

D’Innocenzo G, Gonzalez CC, Williams AM, Bishop DT. Looking to learn: The effects of visual guidance on observational learning of the golf swing. PLoS One. 2016;11: 1–19. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155442

Bieńkiewicz MMN, Bringoux L, Buloup F, Rodger M, Craig C, Bourdin C. The Limitations of Being a Copycat: Learning Golf Putting Through Auditory and Visual Guidance. Front Psychol. 2019;10: 1–19. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00092

Dyer JF, Stapleton P, Rodger M. Mapping sonification for perception and action in motor skill learning. Front Neurosci. 2017;11: 10–13. doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00463

G W, C S. Principles derived form the studies of simple motor skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002;9: 185–211.

Wood G, Vine SJ, Wilson MR. The impact of visual illusions on perception, action planning, and motor performance. Attention, Perception, Psychophys. 2013;75: 830–834. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0489-y

Chauvel G, Wulf G, Maquestiaux F. Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015;22: 717–721. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0744-9

Witt JK, Linkenauger SA, Proffitt DR. Get Me Out of This Slump! Visual Illusions Improve Sports Performance. Psychol Sci. 2012;23: 397–399. doi:10.1177/0956797611428810

Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Optimizing motivation and attention for motor performance and learning. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;16: 38–42. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.005

Palmer K, Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Enhanced expectancies facilitate golf putting. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2016;22: 229–232. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.009

Poolton JM, Masters RSW, Maxwell JP. The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance. Hum Mov Sci. 2005;24: 362–378. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.006

Lam WK, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW. Probing the allocation of attention in implicit (motor) learning. J Sports Sci. 2010;28: 1543–1554. doi:10.1080/02640414.2010.517543

Fazeli D, Taheri H, Saberi Kakhki A. Random Versus Blocked Practice to Enhance Mental Representation in Golf Putting. Percept Mot Skills. 2017;124: 674–688. doi:10.1177/0031512517704106

Pascua LAM, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning. J Sports Sci. 2015;33. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.922693

Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Eves FF. The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Conscious Cogn. 2003;12: 376–402. doi:10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00005-9

Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Eves FF. From novice to no know-how: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning. J Sports Sci. 2000;18: 111–120. doi:10.1080/026404100365180

Ste-Marie DM, Vertes KA, Law B, Rymal AM. Learner-controlled self-observation is advantageous for motor skill acquisition. Front Psychol. 2013;3: 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00556

Tzetzis G, Lola AC. The effect of analogy, implicit, and explicit learning on anticipation in volleyball serving. Int J Sport Psychol. 2015;46: 152–166. doi:10.7352/IJSP2015.46.152

Tse ACY, van Ginneken WF. Children’s conscious control propensity moderates the role of attentional focus in motor skill acquisition. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2017;31: 35–39. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.03.015

Bonney E, Jelsma LD, Ferguson GD, Bouwien C. Learning better by repetition or variation ? Is transfer at odds with task specific training ? 2017; 1–17.

Roshandel S, Taheri H, Moghadam A, Behavior M, Behavior M. motor skill in children. 2017.

Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;6: 77–104. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728

Saemi E, Porter J, Wulf G, Ghotbi-Varzaneh A, Bakhtiari S. Adopting an external focus of attention facilitates motor learning in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Kinesiology. 2013;45: 179–185.

Wulf G, Lewthwaite R, Cardozo P, Chiviacowsky S. Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning. Q J Exp Psychol. 2017; 1–9. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204

Brady F. Contextual interference and teaching golf skills. Percept Mot Skills. 1997;84: 347–350. doi:10.2466/pms.1997.84.1.347

Bonney E, Jelsma LD, Ferguson GD, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Learning better by repetition or variation? Is transfer at odds with task specific training? PLoS One. 2017;12: 1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174214

Magill RA, Hall KG. A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Hum Mov Sci. 1990;9: 241–289. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-X

Rendell MA, Masters RSW, Farrow D, Morris T. An implicit basis for the retention benefits of random practice. J Mot Behav. 2011;43: 1–13. doi:10.1080/00222895.2010.530304

Malhotra N, Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Omuro S, Masters RSW. Dimensions of movement specific reinvestment in practice of a golf putting task. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2015;18: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.11.008

Kal E, Prosée R, Winters M, Van Der Kamp J. Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13: 1–25. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203591

Abbas ZA, North JS. Good-vs. poor-trial feedback in motor learning: The role of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation across levels of task difficulty. Learn Instr. 2018;55: 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.009

Wulf G, Iwatsuki T, Machin B, Kellogg J, Copeland C, Lewthwaite R. Lassoing Skill Through Learner Choice. J Mot Behav. 2018;50: 285–292. doi:10.1080/00222895.2017.1341378

Nourrit-Lucas D, Zelic G, Deschamps T, Hilpron M, Delignières D. Persistent coordination patterns in a complex task after 10 years delay. Subtitle: How validate the old saying “Once you have learned how to ride a bicycle, you never forget!” Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32: 1365–1378. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2013.07.005

Descargas

Publicado

2023-12-23

Cómo citar

Gavala González, J., Román Alconchel, B., Miranda León, M. T., & Fernández García, J. C. (2023). La práctica aleatoria frente a la enseñanza sin errores en el aprendizaje del putt de golf en adolescentes. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencias De La Actividad Física Y El Deporte, 12(3), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.12.3.2023.17895

Número

Sección

Artículos