In which sense (if any) can it be said that Hegel’s Logic is formal?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Metyper.2020.v0i23.5796Keywords:
Hegel, logic, logic form, hylemorfismAbstract
According to some commentators, Hegel’s Logic is not a kind of formal logic, but a material one. Such statement has documental support, because Hegel says formal logic is empty, never the less, there are some texts in Hegelian Opus, which suggests that Hegel thinks of logic as a formal subject. Because of that, also, there are commentator which say Hegel’s logic is a formal system.In this paper I propose that it must be realized that the term “formal” has had several senses along the history of philosophy. According to some of these senses, it can be said that Hegel’s Logic is formal.
Downloads
Metrics
References
- Blanchette, P. (2012), Frege’s Conception of Logic. Oxford University Press
- Brandom, R. (2009), Reason in Philosophy. Harvard University Press
- Doz, A. (1987), La logique de Hegel et les problèmes traditionnels de l’ontologie, Paris, Vrin
- Dragalina-Chernaya, E. (2015), ???????????? ??????? ? ?????????? ?????. ?????-?????????, ???????
- Dutilh Novaes, C. (2011), “The Different Ways in which Logic is (said to be) Formal”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 32: 4, 303-332
- Dutilh Novaes, C. (2012), “Reassessing logical hylomorphism and demarcation of logical constants”, Synthese, 185, 387-410, DOI 10.1007/s1129-010-9825-0
- Ferrarin, A. (2004), Hegel and Aristotle. Cambridge University Press
- Feser, E. (2014), Scholastic Metaphysics. A Contemporany Introduction. Heussentam, Germany, Editones Scholaticae
- Geach, P. (1969), God and the Soul. South Bend, Indiana, St. Augustine’s Press
- Gómez Torrente, M. (2002), “The problem of logical constants”. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 8, 1-37
- Hintikka, J. (1997), Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator: An ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Dordrecht, Boston, London, Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Inwood, M. (1998), Hegel. London, New York, Routledge
- MacFarlane J. G. (2000), “What does it mean to say that logic is formal?” PhD Dissertation, University of Pittsburg
- Miranda, P. (1989), Hegel tenía razón. México, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana
- Oderberg, D. (2007), Real Essentialism. London, New York, Routledge
- Read, S. (1995), Thinking about logic. Oxford University Press
- Rojas, M. (2002). Der Begriff des Logischen und die Notwendigkeit universell-substantieller Vernunft. Aachen, Mainz
- Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (1992), Hegels Analytische Philosophie. Die Wissenschaft der Logik als kritische Theorie der Bedeutung. München, Paderborn
- Stern, R. (1990), Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object. London, New York, Routledge
- Stern, R. (2009), Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford University Press
- Westphal, K. (1989), Hegel’s Epistemological Realism. Dordrecht, Boston, London, Kluwer Academic Publishers
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Once a manuscript has been edited, their authors will be able to use and disseminate them freely, always referring to Metafísica y Persona as the place where they were initially published.
17.png)
