Subtle Categorical Collation of Schelling’s Theoretical Idealism (1800) With Respect to Fichte’s (1794/5)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Metyper.2022.vi27.12784Keywords:
absolute ego, mathematical categories, dynamic categories, matter, factumAbstract
The systematic nature of Schelling’s (1800) and Fichte’s (1794/5) idealistic philosophy
justifies the question of the subtle comparison, proposition by proposition, between both
philosophies, dedicated to exhibit with maximum accuracy the categories distributed from
the first principle to the end of their systems. To narrow down the subject, the comparison
between the two will be given in the direction of Schelling to Fichte from the beginning
to the end of the theoretical part of his thought. What has been agreed in the first will be
analyzed and compared to the extent permitted with the second: I) the first principles will
be contrasted, II) intermediate deductions from the principles, III) the quality table, IV)
quantity, V) relation), VI) modality, both of intuition and of reflection.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Fichte, J., [GA] J. G. Fichte-Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, R. Lauth, E. Fuchs y H. Gliwitzky (ed.), Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Frommann-Holzboog, 1964-2012.
Fichte, J., [FSW] Johann Gottlieb Fichtes sämtliche Werke, I. H. Fichte (ed.), Berlín: De Gruyter, 1971.
Fichte, J. G., Reseña de Enesidemo, edición de Virginia Elena López Domínguez y Jacinto Rivera de Rosales, Madrid: Ediciones Hiperión, 1982.
Fichte, J., [FDC] Fundamento de toda la doctrina de la ciencia (1794), traducción de Juan Cruz Cruz, Pamplona, 2005.
Fichte, J., [DC1811] Doctrina de la ciencia de 1811, traducción de Alberto Ciria, Madrid: Ediciones Akal, 1999.
Schelling, [SW] Schellings Werke, ed. de M. Schröter, C. H. Beck, München, 1927-1965.
Schelling, [SIT] Sistema del idealismo trascendental, edición de Jacinto Rivera de Rosales y Virginia López Domínguez, Anthropos Editorial, 2005.
Acosta E., “La arquitectónica de la deducción de las categorías en el sistema fichteano de 1794/95”, Rev. Filos., Aurora, Curitiba, vol. 27, núm. 42, pp. 689-709, 2015, DOI: 10.7213/aurora.27.042.DS03.
Findler, R., A Sketch of Schelling’s Appropriation of the Kantian Imagination in the System of Transcendental Idealism: Schelling’s Divergence from Fichte, in Asmuth, C.; Denker, A.; Vater, M (Comps.), Schelling. Zwischen Fichte und Hegel / Between Fichte and Hegel, Bd 32, B. R. Grüner, 2000, pp. 41-54.
Hegel, G., Diferencia entre los sistemas filosóficos de Fichte y Schelling, edición de Ma. del Carmen Paredes Martín, Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, 1990.
Janke, W., Sein und Reflexion. Grundlagen der kritischen Vernunft, Berlín: De Gruyter, 1970.
Kant, I., Crítica de la razón pura, traducción de José del Perojo y José Rovira Armengol, Buenos Aires: Editorial Losada, 2003.
Lauth, R., Die erste philosophische Auseinandersetzung zwischen Fichte und Schelling 1795-1797, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, Bd. 21, H. 3, 1967, pp. 341-367.
Lauth, R., “Philosophie transcendentale et idéalisme absolu”, Archives de Philosophie, vol. 48, núm. 3, 1985, pp. 371-384.
Lauth, R., Hegel vor der Wissenschaftslehre, Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH und Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, 1987.
Lauth, R., Schelling ante la Doctrina de la ciencia, España: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Málaga, 2008.
Schnell, A., La déduction du temps chez Fichte et Schelling, Bd 17, Ergon Verlag, 2010, pp. 107-118.
Schnell, A., Der transzendentale Idealismus Fichtes und Schellings, EuroPhilosophie Éditions, vol. 1, 2017, pp. 1-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Once a manuscript has been edited, their authors will be able to use and disseminate them freely, always referring to Metafísica y Persona as the place where they were initially published.
17.png)
