Un Estudio sobre la Anomia y el Neoliberalismo: el Papel de la Desconexión Social en el Bienestar

Autores/as

  • Jesús M. Canto Universidad de Málaga España
  • Miguel Ángel García-Martín Universidad de Málaga España
  • Macarena Vallejo-Martín Universidad de Málaga España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/escpsi.17.1.2024.18009

Palabras clave:

anomia, desigualdad social, neoliberalismo, desconexión social, bienestar

Resumen

Este estudio analiza si los niveles de anomia y desconexión social como consecuencias de la percepción de la aplicación de medidas económicas neoliberales influyen negativamente en el bienestar de los individuos. La muestra del estudio estuvo compuesta por 334 participantes españoles residentes en la ciudad y provincia de Málaga, España (201 mujeres y 133 hombres). La edad de los participantes oscilaba entre los 18 y los 80 años (M = 33,22, DT = 15,35). Los resultados obtenidos mostraron que la anomia y la desconexión social ejercen una mediación en serie sobre la relación entre el neoliberalismo percibido y el bienestar. Se obtuvo que el neoliberalismo percibido tuvo un efecto positivo sobre la anomia y que la anomia tuvo un efecto positivo sobre la desconexión social, mientras que se señaló que la desconexión social tuvo un efecto negativo sobre el bienestar. Los resultados se interpretan desde la perspectiva de la identidad social, asumiendo que una sociedad en estado de anomia no satisface necesidades psicológicas importantes. Esta anomia hace que los individuos se perciban a sí mismos como más desconectados y, como tales, no se beneficien de los posibles efectos positivos de la pertenencia a un grupo y de la identificación social.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Macarena Vallejo-Martín, Universidad de Málaga

Profesora Titular Dpto de Psicología Social, Trabajo Social y Servicios Sociales y Antropología Social

Citas

Abercrombie, N., Hill, S. & Turner, B. S. (2006). The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology. Penguin Random House.

Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. & Zucman, G. (2018). Global inequality dynamics: New findings from WID.world. American Economic Review, 107, 404-409. https://doi.org/10.1257/aerp-p20171095

Beattie, P. (2019). The road to psychopathology: Neoliberalism and the human mind”. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 80-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12304

Becker, J. C., Hartwich, L. & Haslam, S. A. (2021). Neoliberalism can reduce well-being by promoting a sense of social disconnection, competition, and loneliness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60, 947-965. https://doi:10.111/bjso.12438

Blanco, A., & Díaz, D. (2007). Social order and mental health: A social well-being approach. Psychology in Spain, 11, 61-71.

Buttrick, N. R., Heintzelman, S. J. & Oishi, S. (2017). Inequality and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.016

Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G., Haslam, C. & Jetten, J. (2014). Depression and social identity: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18: 215-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523839

d´Hombres, B., Weber, A. & Elia, L. (2012). Literature review on income inequality and the effects on social outcomes. Publication Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788762003

Durkheim, E. (1897/1987). Suicide. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

EUROSTAT. (2020). Inequality of income distribution. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tespm151/default/table?lang=en.

Fischer, C. S. (1973). On urban alienations and anomie. Powerlessness and social isolation. American Sociological Review, 38, 311-326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094355

Fiske, S. (2004). Social beings. A core motives approach to social psychology. Wiley.

Greenaway, K., Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A. & Jetten, J. (2016). Social identities promote well-being because they satisfy global psychological needs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 294-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2169

Gustavsson, M. & Jordahl, H. (2008). Inequality and trust in Sweeden: Some inequalities are more harmful than others. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 348-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007-06.010

Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B. & Anderson, R. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Education.

Hartwich, L., & Becker, J. C. (2019). Exposure to neoliberalism increases resentment of the elite via feeling of anomie and negative psychological reactions. Journal of Social Issues, 75, 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12311

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., Dingle, G. & Haslam, S. A. (2018). The new psychology of health: Unlocking the social cure. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315648569

Haslam, S. A. & Reicher, S. D. (2007). Identity entrepreneurship and the consequences of identity failure: The dynamics of leadership in the BBC Prison Study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 125-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019027250707000204

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S.D. & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351108232

Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.

Helliwell, J. F. & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London, 359, 1435-1446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522

Heydari, A., Teymoori, A. & Nasiri, H. (2014). Development of suicidality within socioeconomic context: Mediation effect of parental control and anomie. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 68, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.68.1.e

Hornsey, M. J. & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_03

IBM Corp. (Released 2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. IBM Corp.

Ionescu, O., Tavani, J. L. & Collange, J. (2021). Political extremism and perceived anomie: New evidence of political extremes’ symmetries and asymmetries with French samples. International Review of Social Psychology, 34, 1-16. http://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.573

Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2019). Encuesta de población active (EPA). Percer trimestre de 2019 [Active Population Survey (EPA). Third quarter of 2019]. Available om line at: https://www.ine.es/daco/daco42/daco4211/epa0319.

Jetten, J. & Peters, K. (2019). The social psychology of inequality. Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3

Konty, M. (2005). The cognitive foundations of the relationship between anomie and deviance. Criminology, 43, 107-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00004.x

Lantz, J. & Harper, K. (1990). Anomic depression and the migrating family. Contemporary Family Therapy, 12, 153-163. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF00892493

McClosky, H. & Schaar, J. H. (1965). Psychological dimensions of anomy. American Sociological Review, 30, 14-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091771

Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672-682.

Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.

Messner, S. F. & Rosenfeld, R. (2001). Crime and the American dream. Wadsworth.

Nachtwey, O. (2016). Die Abstiegsgesellschaft: Über das Aufbegehrem in der regressiven Moderne [The declining society. On rising up in the era of regressive modernity]. VSA Verlag.

Owen, J. (2011). Chavs: The demonization of the working class. Verso Books. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323113494045

Passas, N. (1995). Continuities in the anomie tradition. In F. A. Adler, W. S. Laufer & R. K. Merton (eds.). The legacy of anomie theory (pp. 91-112). Transaction.

Piketty, T. (2015). The economics of inequality. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674915565

Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.10580

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Rothstein, B. & Uslander, E. (2005). All far all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58, 41-73. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0022

Ruiz, J. (2022). Edificio España. El peligro de la desigualdad [Spain building. The danger of inequality]. Espasa.

Scheepers, D. & Ellemers, N. (2019). Status stress: Explaining defensiveness to the resolution of social inequality in members of dominant groups. In J. Jetten & K. Peters. The social psychology of inequality (pp. 294-316). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_17

Shiau, W. L. & Luo, M. M. (2012). Factors affecting online group buying intention and satisfaction: A social exchange theory perspective. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28, 2431-2444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.030

Srole, L. (1956). Social integration and certain corollaries; An exploratory study. American Sociological Review, 21, 709-716. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088422

Surhone, L. M., Tennoe, M. T., & Henssonow, S. F. (2010). Snowball Sampling. Betascript Publishing.

Teo, T. (2018). Homo neoliberalus from personality to forms of subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 28, 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318794899

Teymoori, A., Bastian, B. & Jetten, J. (2017). Towards psychological analysis of anomie. Political Psychology, 38, 1009-1023. http://doi.org/10.111/pops.12377

Teymoori, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., Ariyanto, A., Autin, F., Ayub, N., Badea, C., Besta, T., Butera, F., Costa-Lopes, R., Ciu, L., Fantini, C., Finchilescu, G., Gaertner, L., Gollwitzer, M., Gómez, Á., González, R., Hong, Y., Jensen, D. H…. & Wohl, M. (2016). Revisiting the measurement of anomie. PLoS ONE 11(17): eo158370. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158370

Thorlindsson, T. & Bernburg, J. G. (2004). Durkheim’s theory of social order and deviance: A multi-level test. European Sociological Review, 20, 271-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/jch025

Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.824504

Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Random House.

Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. (2019). The inner level: How more equal societies reduce stress, restore sanity and improve everyone’s well-being. Penguin Random House.

Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275-313. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1

Descargas

Publicado

2024-06-30

Cómo citar

Canto, J. M., García-Martín, M. Ángel, & Vallejo-Martín, M. (2024). Un Estudio sobre la Anomia y el Neoliberalismo: el Papel de la Desconexión Social en el Bienestar. Escritos De Psicología - Psychological Writings, 17(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.24310/escpsi.17.1.2024.18009

Número

Sección

Informes de investigación