Are the personality traits associated with psychological well-being?
Keywords:
personality, psychological well-being, older adultsAbstract
There is little information on how personality traits can affect psychological well-being. Studies suggest that the traits with the strongest associations with psychological well-being are neuroticism and extraversion to. The present study investigated associations between personality traits and the six dimensions of psychological well-being in a sample of older Spanish adults. The sample comprised 224 older adults who completed the psychological well-being scales and the NEO-FFI questionnaire. The results were analyzed using multiple linear regressions. Significant associations were found between all the dimensions of psychological well-being: these associations were negative in the case of neuroticism, and positive in the case of extraversion, conscientiousness, openness to experience, and agreeableness. The negative association between neuroticism and the dimensions of psychological well-being suggest that high scores in this trait would be maladaptive for a good aging experience. Positive associations between other personality traits and psychological well-being suggest that they would facilitate optimal functioning during aging.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Allik, J., Church, A. T., Ortiz, F. A., Rossier, J., H?ebí?ková, M., De Fruyt, F., ... & McCrae, R. R. (2017). Mean profiles of the NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 402-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117692100
Anglim, J., & Grant, S. (2016). Predicting Psychological and Subjective Well-Being from Personality: Incremental Prediction from 30 Facets over the Big 5. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9583-7
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471-507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471
Bardi, A., & Ryff, C. D. (2007). Interactive effects of traits on adjustment to a life transition. Journal of Personality, 75, 955-984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00462.x
Butkovic, A., Brkovic, I., & Bratko, D. (2012). Predicting well-being from personality in adolescents and older adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9273-7
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). Inventario de Personalidad Neo Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario Neo Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI) (2ª edición). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonía, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1
Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67, 590-597. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029541
Diener, E. (2013). The remarkable changes in the science of subjective wellbeing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 663-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613507583
Grant, S., Langan-Fox, J., & Anglim, J. (2009). The big five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being. Psychological Reports, 105, 205-231. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.1.205-231
Guindon, S., & Cappeliez, P. (2010). Contributions of PWB and social support to an integrative model of subjective health in later adulthood. Ageing International, 35, 38-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-009-9050-7
Harris, M. A., Brett, C. E., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2016). Personality stability from age 14 to age 77 years. Psychology and Aging, 31, 862-874. 882-774. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000133862
Huppert, F. A. (2009). Psychological well-being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1, 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.x
Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., & Pulkkinen, L. (2013). Associations between personality traits and psychological well-being across time in middle adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 748-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.07.002
Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 592-615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948
Magnus, K., Diener, E., Fujita, F., & Pavot, W. (1993). Extraversion and neuroticism as predictors of objective life events: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1046-1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1046
Manga, D., Ramos, F., & Morán, C. (2004). The Spanish norms of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory: New data and analyses for its improvement. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 639-648.
Marrero, R. & Carballeira, M. (2012). The contribution of personality to psychological well-being: an exploratory study. En B. S. Nguyen (Ed.), Psychology of Satisfaction (pp. 41-65). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Mayordomo, T., Sales, A., Satorres, E., & Meléndez, J. C. (2016). Bienestar psicológico en función de la etapa de vida, el sexo y su interacción. Pensamiento Psicológico, 14, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI14-2.bpfe
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729101700217
Meléndez, J. C., Satorres, E., Cujiño, M. A., & Reyes, M. F. (2019). Big Five and psychological and subjective well-being in Colombian older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 82, 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.01.016
Mõttus, R., McNeill, G., Jia, X., Craig, L. C. A., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2013). The associations between personality, diet and body mass index in older people. Health Psychology, 32, 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025537
Parks-Leduc, L., Feldman, G., & Bardi, A. (2015). Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314538548
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. En M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97-123). New York: Guilford Press.
Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: reexamining methods and meanings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 549-559. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.549
Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Psychological wellbeing, health and ageing. Lancet, 385, 640-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0
Sun, J., Kaufman, S. B., & Smillie, L. D. (2018). Unique associations between big five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well-being. Journal of Personality, 86, 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12301
Tomás, J. M., Meléndez, J. C., & Navarro, E. (2008). Modelos factoriales confirmatorios de las escalas de Ryff en una muestra de personas mayores. [Factorial confirmatory models of Ryff’s scales in a sample of elderly people]. Psicothema, 20, 298-304.
Tomás, J. M., Sancho, P., Meléndez, J. C., & Mayordomo, T. (2012). Resilience and coping as predictors of general well-being in the elderly: a structural equation modeling approach. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.615737
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.